Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Michele Bachmann Sarah Palin's Phil Crane?
06/22/2011 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 06/22/2011 9:20:38 AM PDT by Brices Crossroads

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: editor-surveyor; indylindy
"Get your self a skin sissy-boy."


I do not need a 'skin" because you name calling does not bother me, it merely bores me the way listening to a sandbox full of children calling names would when I was trying to have an adult conversation. I was asked why I was being nice and suggested that I wasn't, but just refusing to play these childish games of name calling.
121 posted on 06/22/2011 4:30:04 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Don't lump me in with that weasel, I was just being smart-alecky with him, not agreeing. What is with you, man?

The brother gots to keep his pimp hand strong!

Word.

8^D

122 posted on 06/22/2011 4:46:15 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval" ©2010 by Gargantua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: NJ_Tom

“I originally thought a Palin/Bachmann ticket would be great. Your analysis, however, is spot on!”

Agreed. It is a question of trust Bachmann’s character is now suspect where it was not before. This is the perception in the minds of a large swath of Palin voters and it is undeniable. It makes her even less viable as a challenger to Romney and thus a vote for her is not merely wasted but it is an assist to Mitt.


123 posted on 06/22/2011 5:39:34 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

It’s almost uncanny how well the players match up between 1980 and 2012. Thanks for pointing this out.


124 posted on 06/22/2011 5:42:22 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rob777

I doubt that you’ve ever had an adult conversation, judging by your conduct here.

Just an inuendo troll that makes insubstantial comments about others supposedly unsubstantiated claims, but has no idea which claims are unsubstantiated.

Kind of like British humor I suppose.


125 posted on 06/22/2011 5:44:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

It was what is known here as a “courtesy ping.”

Get a cup of coffee :o)


126 posted on 06/22/2011 5:47:18 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

“Another hit piece on Michele Bachmann claiming she is nothing more than a stalking horse for Mitt Romney, set out to fulfill the establishment’s wishes of destroying Sarah Palin.”

Get a clue. You don’t know the difference between a hit piece (such as commenting on her 23 foster children and all the state subsides she received or her use of her Congressional staff/expense accounts to campaign) and a commentary on strategy being employed by campaign(s). Not to worry. IN the coming months you are going to get an education on the distinction as the MSM (and the blogosphere) focus on Michele Bachmann. If you think this is a hit piece, you better buckle your seat belt, fella!


127 posted on 06/22/2011 5:50:19 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

And I bet you have a heavy case to rest!


128 posted on 06/22/2011 5:50:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

LOL. You are right. Bachmann hasn’t even been scratched yet and her minions are already yelling like stuck pigs. They had better grow a thicker skin.


129 posted on 06/22/2011 5:53:10 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Whatever. I have a heavy case and you have no case but make believe and falsehoods.

That won’t hold you in good stead and you will find that out in due time. You might think yourself a wiz here, but this is just a speck. That is what you should think about.


130 posted on 06/22/2011 6:00:14 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Ping to the article


131 posted on 06/22/2011 8:25:14 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Cool!

What you call falsehoods, normal people recognize as facts.

Your twisted hatred of Palin has you spinning counter clockwise so far that you think the classless actions of Bachmann are “conservatism.”


132 posted on 06/22/2011 9:04:24 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; indylindy
Your twisted hatred of Palin...

A prime example that manifests the idiocy and depravity of you people .
indylindy has on numerous occasion stated that she would be voting for Palin if the lady is the nominee. Now tell me, if one has a "twisted hatred" for someone then why would one vote for that person?

There is much to admire in regard to the political nature of both Palin and Bachmann, yet both, and every other politician alive today, has a wart or two.
Some voters may dismiss these shortcomings, others may not.
Also, I will assert, that if Palin, or Bachmann, looked like Rosa DeLauro neither lady would enjoy anywhere near the level support they currently do.

133 posted on 06/22/2011 10:59:10 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

This is absolutely excellent analysis.
BUMP for great freeping.


134 posted on 06/22/2011 11:14:52 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
but to deny that Bachmann could win the nomination is foolish.

To think she CAN win the nomination is foolish. I love Bachmann, but it's not happening, no way.
/facepalm

135 posted on 06/22/2011 11:19:01 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“a turd in the bowl”

You shouldn’t use language like that on this board.


136 posted on 06/23/2011 4:35:37 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

She’s leading isn’t she? She’s by no means a shoo-in, but she has a shot.

I’d be more worried in the general.


137 posted on 06/23/2011 6:15:04 AM PDT by RockinRight (Cain/Bachmann, Bachmann/Rubio, or, if you really want some fun, Cain/McCotter in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Jess79
I think it's far more important to have the right philosophy and ethics than to have "executive experience." A President does not personally micro-manage the country; he has a cabinet, a large staff, and beneath him is a force of millions of civil servants doing the detail work. What the President needs to do is to set goals and sell them to the people. That's what Reagan did. There is no shortage of people with the necessary expertise in defense, foreign relations, economics, etc.; they will be beating down the door applying for jobs once the Presidential candidate is elected, if not before.

Incidentally, I think debates are a stupid way of selecting candidates, as is the expectation that a candidate is no good if he/she does not instantly know the name of the premier of Upper Volta, or similar trivia. A President almost never has to make quick decisions. He needs to confer with his staff. Yet debates reward people who seem "smart" because they can rattle off details and repeat slogans.

138 posted on 06/23/2011 7:00:19 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

I have to agree with you about debates. Most the time the questions are inane, usually designed by liberals to provide ‘gotcha’ moments.


139 posted on 06/23/2011 8:44:08 AM PDT by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: jla

>> “There is much to admire in regard to the political nature of both Palin and Bachmann” <<

.
I used to believe that too, up until March of this year, when Bachmann’s malevolence and live interview stupidity surfaced. I don’t even trust her in congress now; she was a cheerleader for Boehner’s cave-in on the budget.

“Rosa DeLauro”

LOL!


140 posted on 06/23/2011 11:22:25 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson