Fox News expert denies he claimed birth certificate legit

WND ^ | June 22, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi

[RobinMasters]

NEW YORK – The computer graphics expert Fox News relied upon to claim the birth certificate the White House released April 27 was legitimate insists that the network must retract the story, claiming it deliberately misquoted him and continues to ignore his repeated requests.

Jean Claude Tremblay told WND that that none of his comments would permit the conclusion that the Obama birth certificate is an authentic document.

"I no longer trust Fox News," he said, expressing anger verging on distain for the way he feels the network treated him. "Despite my protests, Fox News will not allow me to correct their story."

The controversy traces to a Web story by Fox News reporter Jana Winter two days after the White House released the birth certificate, titled "Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate is Legit."

[bgill]

I turned off FOX three years ago. Used to watch them exclusively but then they turned into CNN light.

[Fantasywriter]

It’s an interesting theory, that Obama may see his lies as perpetrated on behalf of the greater good. Having had up close and personal experience with a Malignant Narcissist, I see it somewhat differently. The MN starts out at a VERY early age lying first and foremost to himself. [MN is a mental dysfunction and a serious personality disorder, brought on by a childhood too difficult to process in a normal, healthy framework.] At a very early stage the MN comes to believe his lies over and above reality, evidence, the facts and experience.

By the time an MN reaches adulthood, he is incapable of seeing objectively beyond his false and internally fabricated worldview. Everything is processed through the warped lens of his Narcissistic presuppositions: foremost of which is that he is the smartest, most singularly gifted and amazing person alive.

Imo, Obama has no idea he’s lying. His brain is far too addled by a lifetime of falsely interpreting data. I.e.: the data says he’s lazy, unaccomplished and not particularly bright. He’s had to run it through his perverted internal filter, and come up with the conclusion/image of the most brilliant and talented man on earth. So when he tells a lie, he thinks it’s the truth. If he contradicts it five minutes later, he is unaware of the contradiction.

That’s what makes this guy so scary. Yes, he is a marxist, a muslim sympathizer and an America-hater. But first and foremost he’s a Malignant Narcissist, which means that ***everything*** he does is above all for himself, and in the furtherance of his twisted self-image.

We need him gone ASAP. ‘12 can’t come soon enough.

[Kleon]

If you have found profound duplicate pixel distortion like this on a non-photoshopped scan, please post it or post a link.

I've previously posted examples here. Of all the "anomalies" found in the Obama birth certificate, the cloned letters and duplicated pixels have been the easiest to find in other documents. It's absolutely not smoking gun evidence for fraud.

[MHGinTN]

OCR scans of letters is not the issue. When two boxes on the same single (supposedly) scanned document are identical, as if the original printer of the form made absolutely exact separate boxes, that is evidence that a box was picked up and used/moved via a Adobe/photoshop type technique. But you’re doing a great job running interference, dissembling, obfuscating for the won.

[Kleon]

OCR scans of letters is not the issue. When two boxes on the same single (supposedly) scanned document are identical, as if the original printer of the form made absolutely exact separate boxes, that is evidence that a box was picked up and used/moved via a Adobe/photoshop type technique.

A box, in terms of character recognition, is no different from a letter or number, because it too is just a standard Unicode character. You can even type it — □.

To be evidence that it was intentionally copied, it would need to be something that wouldn't be recognized as a Unicode character, like, say, a drawing.

[Marine_Uncle]

And it is not going to get any fairer out there. Their all agenda driven machines.

[itsahoot]

The bigger question, is why not one person in Congress or the Senate, nor one Federal Judge has stepped up?

My contention for years is that pubbies and dummies alike, are really in favor of what is happening to our Republic, they just hide their true agenda behind court decisions.

Why has congress completely abrogated their authority to various regulatory agencies? As in olden times, they demand, give us a King to rule over us.

I will live in relative freedom the rest of my life, but my children and grandchildren will not. I fear God will not be kind to our generation, for what we have allowed to happen. What shall we say to Him when we meet Him face to face?

[Beckwith]

It's absolutely not smoking gun evidence for fraud.

If Barack Obama told you to your face that both of his released birth documents were counterfeit, you'd call him a liar.

[Beckwith]

Re: Stop posting this insane WND crap.

Who elected you hall monitor?

[BykrBayb]

Thank you for those links. I had only seen a handful of them.

Have Obama’s trolls been adding keywords to make those threads easier to find?

[Christian Engineer Mass]

“you ought to be more appreciative of the life of magic and luxury into which you were born”

What makes you think I’m not? Assumptive oldies. Don’t know they’re born. So stuck in their ways they couldn’t change lanes on a sunny day.

[jh4freedom]

I wish we could interest a committee of the House of Representatives in issuing a congressional subpoena for the original birth record and then have a diplomat of the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners review the birth certificate.
My understanding is that you can’t discern an altered or forged document by looking at scans or photocopies. You need the original document for authentification or exposure as an altered or forged document.
http://www.abfde.org/

[Future Useless Eater]

Hi BB,

No. If the trolls salted those threads with nuisance keywords they would very quickly get banned.

But just by glancing where the one-subject trolls visit, one can quickly find the juiciest usurper threads that they desperately want to discredit and derail.

[UnwashedPeasant]

Below are animated GIFs alternating back-and-forth between allegedly duplicate images.

Here are your cherry-picked examples of duplicate pixel distortion from ordinary OCR-processed images (from this post):

And below are the suspicious duplicates from the Obama BC -- not cherry-picked, but all from the same PDF from Whitehouse.gov -- and blown up 3200%. (Don't trust me, folks; look at the original file.)

The Obama BC is not an OCR file (with selectable text). If it ever was an OCR file, then the current revision would be expected to have additional distortion introduced during conversion to PDF, making duplicates *less* similar.

Your examples of letter cloning are very impressive (good work!), but they are not remotely as impressive as the cloning in the Obama BC. This is very strong evidence of forgery. It might not be conclusive at this point, but it deserves serious investigation.

[MHGinTN]

My guess is the won’s little soldier of deceit will just ignore the very revealing post you’ve made ... until new directives are issued on how to answer the truth with yet another carefully crafted LIE. Thanks for the ping. One wonders if these obamanoids realize they’re the enemies of the Republic and servants of the rising federal oligarchy. They probably embrace the crap.

[ASouthernGrl]

THANK YOU! I'm glad somebody brought this up. I read it almost 2 years ago. Explains why the media are so “hush-hush” about the eligibility issue.

[Kleon]

Your examples of letter cloning are very impressive (good work!), but they are not remotely as impressive as the cloning in the Obama BC.

The tiny differences are probably due to my converting and saving them in MS Paint. In the original PDF, the letters don't have those subtle differences. You can check that yourself by opening the first PDF in that list. The two P's, for example, come from the word "suppose" on the second page second paragraph. Things that look different in the animated GIF are actually identical down to the pixel.

[Kleon]

And below are the suspicious duplicates from the Obama BC -- not cherry-picked, but all from the same PDF from Whitehouse.gov -- and blown up 3200%. (Don't trust me, folks; look at the original file.)

I've seen a list someone made of all the examples of this in the Obama birth certificate. Two things stood out to me: first, they show up with about the same frequency as other examples I've found on the web (which are very easy to find); and second, cloned letters often turn up in parts of the document where it wouldn't make sense if someone was forging the document, like random letters in parts that are supposed to be part of the original form (not typed in).

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

cloned letters often turn up in parts of the document where it wouldn't make sense...

The main thing that doesn't make sense to me about the cloned letter evidence is that I'd have to believe the forger cloned (copied and pasted) two of the boxes but not the third. Or, to use one of the other examples, the 'A' in one word and the first 'A' but not the second in another, in "STATE OF HAWAII."

[Kleon]

Or, to use one of the other examples, the 'A' in one word and the first 'A' but not the second in another, in "STATE OF HAWAII."

The small O's in the headings are also curious. The same two types are repeated over and over, but then a different one is dropped in for no apparent reason, like in the word "for" in box 23. That one is particularly strange, because right next to it is an 'R' that's repeated throughout the document.