Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kleon

OCR scans of letters is not the issue. When two boxes on the same single (supposedly) scanned document are identical, as if the original printer of the form made absolutely exact separate boxes, that is evidence that a box was picked up and used/moved via a Adobe/photoshop type technique. But you’re doing a great job running interference, dissembling, obfuscating for the won.


64 posted on 06/22/2011 9:08:48 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
OCR scans of letters is not the issue. When two boxes on the same single (supposedly) scanned document are identical, as if the original printer of the form made absolutely exact separate boxes, that is evidence that a box was picked up and used/moved via a Adobe/photoshop type technique.

A box, in terms of character recognition, is no different from a letter or number, because it too is just a standard Unicode character. You can even type it — □.

To be evidence that it was intentionally copied, it would need to be something that wouldn't be recognized as a Unicode character, like, say, a drawing.

65 posted on 06/22/2011 9:36:41 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson