A veto is possible however, we have our RINOS too.
This is a battle we need to win before 2012. The article states
Were both of those issues in the same bill? If I were gov, I'd sign half of it.
Oh, right, just for voting...
Impeach Nixon!
(that’s a blast from the past, isn’t it?)
In Barry’s new American banana republic, preventing voter fraud is now known as “disenfranchising” DemocRAT “voters” who are so worthless and ignorant that they can’t seem to be able to come up with a voter I.D. in order to vote. Now that’s pretty ignorant if you ask me. People this worthless and ignorant shouldn’t be voting anyway. IMHO.
Also, ID will no longer be required to enter a government building, enroll in public school, buy liquor or tobacco, cash checks, apply for unemployment, welfare or social security, check out a library book, to fly, buy a bus or train ticket, obtain a passport, or open any kind of credit account
lest people be disenfranchised
sarc
Yet we need an ID to get a job, cash a check, to buy cigarettes, alcohol (which I’m sure the dem voters do), open a bank account, and a lot of other things. But asking someone to show an ID to vote would “disinfranchise” them. The dems promote voter fraud - simple as that.
We have a voter ID requirement in Michigan now. Look what happened.
We won the governor’s mansion, 2 US house seats, attorney general, secretary of state, several state senate seats, several state house seats, and a state supreme court seat.
“In his formal veto message, Nixon said the bill would disenfranchise voters who don’t have access to a photo ID or the documents necessary to obtain one, such as a birth certificate. Specifically, he said access to the ballot box could be limited for seniors and the disabled.”
So, how’d they get registered to vote in the first place with no birth certificate or ID? Hmmm?
Time to make the law actually work for the rest of us = sue merchants, banks, airlines, TSA, etc. for demanding photo ID to conduct other types of business, as it must also "disenfranchise" minorities, elderly types and single women!
Would an override be possible?
Put a photo on their EBT cards.
The ONLY reason to oppose voter ID, is to SUPPORT VOTER FRAUD!
A Democrat in favor of enabling voter fraud?? Gee...seems IMPOSSIBLE, doesn’t it!!!
The Great State of Misery!
“...disenfranchise voters... “
This is code speak that means “Stop Democrat voting fraud.”
If they can get some kind of ID to get food stamps, public housing, SSI, Medicaid..., they can show an ID for voting. If they work, they should already have an ID. The only “disenfranchised voters” are illegals who shouldn’t be voting, and military personnel who Democrats manage to exclude.
How about the ‘disenfranchising’ of legal voters because their vote is
being negated by other’s illegal votes?
What crap. Fraud at the polls. Fraud in the White House.
Foregive me if I am wrong,
BUT
Isn’t Missouri one of the states that is about as dirty as Chicago when election time comes???
Of course political machines have been voting dead peopleforever. I think Aaron Burr resorted to this in 1800 after he set up Tammany Hall. But the main thing is to organize down to local and get people to the polls. Next thing is to get observers into the polling places and make sure that the cheating is kept to a minimum. All this takes boots on the ground. Inevitably some precincts are as hard to police as a Taliban village.