Uh, this won’t fly. The feds can’t interfere with states internal government...............
>>The feds can’t interfere with states internal government...<<
I agree. Must be a publicity stunt.
Perhaps you remember the 2000 election?
Pardon me while I laugh so hard I cough up a lung. They've been doing exactly that for over 65 years.
Hahaha, you're funny! But...
"...denies hundreds of thousands of public employees their right to collectively bargain for a better life..."
There's no way the court is going to say they're right because it would effectively establish a minimum level of collective bargaining privileges for government workers. This level, the former Wisconsin level, is far higher than what federal employees get by law. Under equal protection, the federal employees would then be entitled to Wisconsin-level privileges. Even Obama doesn't want that.
Not if they find a leftist judge (most are) who violates his oath of office by ignoring our Constitution.
I used to think that ,too.
I guess we need re-education.
From the article:
The case was assigned to Federal Judge William M. Conley. Conley is an appointee of President Barack Obama.
The Obama Feds will interfere any damn where they want.
Do you mean the way that the Feds aren't interfering with the amendment to California's constitution known a Proposition 8?
Oh, wait...
LOL!
On October 29, 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Conley to serve on the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
That and the fact that there’s no “right” to a specific level of income.
I suspect they’re planning to judge shop and hope they can get a liberal judge to issue a stay pending the case, then slow-roll the case.
Walker needs to order his AG to finish the publication of the law NOW. Then he needs to put it into effect immediately.
They think it's found in the U.S. Constitution, "Thou shalt not interfere with union collective bargaining."
Seems people disagree with your assessment Red, after watching Obama I have to agree with them. Its not that they are afraid to interfere, they just don’t want all the federal unions getting big ideas right now.
I hope you are right, but do you really believe the Feds won’t interfere given the chance?
They have to peg it someting in the Constitution. The only they could try is the commerce clause. I suppose you could try make a case on:
1. Public schools receive fed money(which has little to do with commerce).
2. Some teachers and state civil servants go out of state for vacations. Thus, they may use the Fed hwy stem and spend money outside their own state.
3. Public schools may use materials bought outside the state. These include paper, A-V equipment, pool chemicals or whatever.
I’m no expert on the commerce clause. Anybody want to way in?
Rules and laws didn’t stop that two-bit Democrat county judge from issuing her edict in Wisconsin. So some two-bit federal judge will probably do the same, until it gets up to the USSC, and they lose again.
How did the SCOTUS rule that CA must release 46,000 prisoners, then? I am just asking an honest question, I haven’t been following the issues extremely closely.
LOL.
Sure they can.. it’s called the US Constitution and oh by the way after you ever heard of the commerence clause?