Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michele Bachmann Vows To ‘Repeal Obamacare’ But Refuses To Criticize Mitt Romney Or Romneycare
Mediate ^ | Tuesday June 14, 2011 | Matt Schneider

Posted on 06/14/2011 7:43:53 AM PDT by Bigtigermike

Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann vowed again in her appearance on GMA this morning to repeal the “job-killer” known as “Obamacare.” Yet despite several valiant attempts by George Stephanopoulos to get Bachmann to say something, anything, critical about frontrunner Mitt Romney, she refused to get off message and ignored his question completely.

When Stephanopoulos asked whether Bachmann had any critique of “Romneycare” in Massachusetts, Bachmann instead repeated “Obamacare will steamroll over all the state laws” and suggested that what anyone else will do, or has done, is not relevant to her plans. .

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bachmann; bachmann4mitt; backstabbing4romney; palin; romney; romneycare; romneystalkinghorse; romneywhore; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2011 7:43:57 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Perhaps... she just didn’t say something negative about Romney because she doesn’t want to slam another GOP’er. Her focus was on Obama’s healthcare and she didn’t get “tricked” into this becoming a mud slinging competition. IMHO.


2 posted on 06/14/2011 7:45:56 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Staying on message. Attacking Democrats. Not attacking Republicans.

It's beautiful.

3 posted on 06/14/2011 7:46:02 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Stand united against another Obama term, at this point, and not turn on each other. I see wisdom in this.


4 posted on 06/14/2011 7:46:58 AM PDT by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
Perhaps... she just didn’t say something negative about Romney because she doesn’t want to slam another GOP’er. Her focus was on Obama’s healthcare and she didn’t get “tricked” into this becoming a mud slinging competition. IMHO.

That didn't stop her campaign consultant Ed Rollins from bashing Palin, did it?

5 posted on 06/14/2011 7:47:17 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

She handled it very well, IMO. Good for her.


6 posted on 06/14/2011 7:47:29 AM PDT by SoKatt ("Change" is not a strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I wouldn’t be surprised if the candidates decided on this as a tactic prior to the debate. Attacking one another just feeds the MSM agenda. Don’t give them what they want. Give them what they don’t want.


7 posted on 06/14/2011 7:48:19 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Veep?


8 posted on 06/14/2011 7:48:28 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Welcome to the Willard Romney, "It's My Turn" tour..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Agreed. After watching that last night - I felt a lot better about our chances.

Any of those guys is better than Obama


9 posted on 06/14/2011 7:49:24 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (F U B O ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Her campaign manager sure did say something negative against another woman who’s not even in the race yet


10 posted on 06/14/2011 7:49:43 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

There’s a huge difference between a state choosing some kind of universal healthcare and the federal government mandating that the states adopt a universal program.


11 posted on 06/14/2011 7:50:26 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (When life gives you lemons, throw them back and demand chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Give them what they don’t want.

While I wouldn't want to turn everything into a "Isn't-Sarah-Marvelous?" thread, I think that Palin has shown good skill in dealing with the media. Ignore them. Don’t give them what they want. Give them what they don’t want. It seems like a lot of Republican candidates are doing this, and it can only help us.

If this is a tactic that puts Bachmann or Cain or Palin in the White House, I'll be thrilled.

12 posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:01 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike; dirtboy

Do you think she learned a lesson from the Palin comment since this is post that event or do you think she actually likes Romney?


13 posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:26 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

That old 11th commandment is guaranrteeing a romney nomination.


14 posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:34 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (It's in the cards ------- Romney/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
I wouldn’t be surprised if the candidates decided on this as a tactic prior to the debate. Attacking one another just feeds the MSM agenda. Don’t give them what they want. Give them what they don’t want.

Palinesque wouldn't you say? They may be bashing Palin, but it looks like they may have taken a page right out of her playbook. Stay on topic.

15 posted on 06/14/2011 7:53:50 AM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Michele is running for vice president.


16 posted on 06/14/2011 7:54:51 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Exactly, She is Washington Insider, she knows that establishment will go with Romney and they will support her for Vee PEE.


17 posted on 06/14/2011 7:55:07 AM PDT by jennychase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
If this is a tactic that puts Bachmann or Cain or Palin in the White House, I'll be thrilled.

I agree. I'm hoping we've learned something on media bias and how to deal with it. We're smarter than they are. We have to use it.

18 posted on 06/14/2011 7:55:07 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
There is a huge difference between state-level action and federal-level mandates. Romney is actually pretty effective at making this point. It's a good one.

Now, as a MA resident, I can say that I'm pretty unhappy about what Romney did to healthcare in MA. He's not getting my vote. But it is absolutely true that what Obama did at the federal level is a disaster and completely unconstitutional.

19 posted on 06/14/2011 7:55:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Staying on message. Attacking Democrats. Not attacking Republicans.

The she is a hypocrite.

Unless Sarah Palin isn't a Republican.
20 posted on 06/14/2011 7:55:40 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson