Perhaps... she just didn’t say something negative about Romney because she doesn’t want to slam another GOP’er. Her focus was on Obama’s healthcare and she didn’t get “tricked” into this becoming a mud slinging competition. IMHO.
It's beautiful.
Stand united against another Obama term, at this point, and not turn on each other. I see wisdom in this.
There’s a huge difference between a state choosing some kind of universal healthcare and the federal government mandating that the states adopt a universal program.
That old 11th commandment is guaranrteeing a romney nomination.
Michele is running for vice president.
Because she’s in bed with Romney.
A.) As a thwart against Palin (i.e. She’s now the voice of the Tea Party, so no reason for Palin to run).
B.) She wants the VP slot. (Was this a promise from the RINO/Rove/Romney faction to thwart Palin?)
If anyone doesn’t see that they are blind.
If she feels so strongly about it, why didn’t we hear her voice when it was being passed. It was very quiet then and the only voice was Sarah’s..and when she spoke of their death panels - even this admin was listening.
All those coming out now saying they are against it - how could one be against something and have the floor but say nothing. Now, for vote purposes, they take advantage of their floor to speak out - I’m not impressed.
There is only one reason for the MSM to insist upon debates this early. They want a bit of blood letting on the GOP side, they want the bleeding to start early and often.
Glad to know the candidates are (so far) refusing to take the bait.
If this is indeed the group tactic — to focus fire on Obama and to avoid attack son each other — it’s a pretty smart one. There’s plenty of time to draw contrasts with each other, but it’s never too early to start tearing apart the Obama myth.
I can see how to argue that it’s both helpful to Romney (the longer he goes unchallenged as the supposed “frontrunner”, the better for him) and the also-rans (making the case that if any of us is better than Obama, then why settle for Romney’s damaged goods?).
Now is not the time to get specific and hammer an opponent.
She needs to garner momentum and support from those who are undecided about her.
If it comes down to a debate between 2 or 3 candidates then she should open the can of whoopass and have at it.
Hopefully, Mutt will get clue and drop out before that ever occurs.
Everybody is going to repeal obamacare. I will believe it when I see it,but, I would for hell to freeze over first.
Maybe MB is looking for that VP spot!
If they hadn’t spent so much time saying how bad Obama was, and actually put into words what they would actually do, not just what needs to be done, they would have a lot more credibility.
She didn’t have to slam rommneycare, others did it for her. Besides, slamming his rino/democrat plan is only restating the obvious.
What is she going to criticize Romney for? Saying that he would repeal Obamacare too. As much as many people want to believe the Old Media that Obamacare is a bigger Romneycare they are very wrong. Romney didn’t get the medical care plan as he envisioned it, but he still didn’t want to mandate people buying their own insurance. Romneycare is to Obamacare as Rap is to Music.
Michele is keeping it classy. And she was doing that because she was in unfriendly territory. Brave Lady.
Keep the heat on Obama.
Well of course not. Her focus on ‘attacking’ has been directed toward Gov Palin. I don’t care what Bachmann says or how she sounds, hiring a hit man and going after Palin and not distancing herself from those remarks (that I’ve seen) reveals more about Bachmann than all the things she “says”. Further, about 6 weeks ago when she was asked whether or not she was running for President, she made the comment that her and her husband were seeking a ‘higher power’s’ direction.
A congressman/woman would make a lousy president anyway. A legislator knows only one thing...how to make more laws.
Gee, WWPD?