Skip to comments.
Ancient Hominid Males Stayed Home While Females Roamed, Study Finds
Science Daily ^
| 06-001-2011
| Staff + University of Colorado at Boulder.
Posted on 06/08/2011 10:19:59 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Red Badger
... And they died out, right?
21
posted on
06/08/2011 11:02:29 AM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: Verginius Rufus
They threw stones..............
22
posted on
06/08/2011 11:03:57 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
To: Red Badger
I don't know.... sounds like the just borrowed the social model of Lions.
Woman! Fetch me some bacon!
23
posted on
06/08/2011 11:08:23 AM PDT
by
sjmjax
(Politicans are like bananas - they start out green, turn yellow, then rot.)
To: Red Badger
It is truly stunning what passes for scientific analysis these days. You don't need empirical evidence at all; you only need a plausible explanation ... and a few of your buddies to go along with it.
24
posted on
06/08/2011 11:12:12 AM PDT
by
dartuser
("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
To: Sacajaweau
it is generally thought the evolution of bipedalism was due in part to allow individuals to range longer distances They are so clueless. Walking on two legs is not a net advantage. Having two arms free to wield weapons is. Hunting does not cause our armpits to start lubricating for an extended fight, but the approach of a strange human does. Most human specific traits were and still are for tribal warfare.
25
posted on
06/08/2011 11:30:56 AM PDT
by
Reeses
To: Red Badger
the key word in there being “extinct”...
To: SeeSharp
Amazing what conclusions you can come to, as this article does, when you make some basic erroneous assumptions.
Usually, you can “prove” your assumptions by assuming your assumptions and examining the evidence through the lens of those assumptions... and NOT GET DIZZY DOING SO!
27
posted on
06/08/2011 12:45:26 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: The Cajun
Strong the BS is with this article.
28
posted on
06/08/2011 12:47:28 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Red Badger
29
posted on
06/08/2011 1:09:43 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
To: Red Badger
alternate explanation. The females were tradeable commodities.
30
posted on
06/08/2011 3:55:05 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
To: Red Badger
But of course...it was the Stone Age.
They had a little child throw the first one ("let him who is without sin cast the first stone...").
To: Red Badger
Probably visiting their mothers.
To: Red Badger
33
posted on
06/08/2011 9:08:51 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson