Expert: Obama doc is 'proof' – of fraud

World Net Daily ^ | June 7, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi

[conservativegramma]

Typeface analysis shows images come from different machines

The online image of a Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on April 27 as "proof positive" that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was "proof," but not of what the White House would have wanted.

Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his business, has says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it absolutely to be a forgery.

"My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter," Irey told WND.

"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a forgery."

Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been done to produce the word "Student," for example, that had two different styles of the lower case "t."

[Exmil_UK]

This evidence is strong enough to take to law enforcement type writer experts. They will not be in a position to act, but they will be uneasy and unhappy.

The capital letter pairs are absolutely horrible, as bad, if not actually worse than the debossed seal on COLB2.

Obama is a step closer to the edge. If anyone squeals, he's going over it.

[CynicalBear]

>>she wants anyone who disagrees with the birther conspiracies to be hung. Actually, last I checked she wants to hang the President, Congress, the Judiciary, the FBI, the Secret Service, the media, anyone on FR that disagrees with birther conspiracies, etc.<<

I haven’t seen that. Would you please post proof of that statement?

[Admin Moderator]

I haven’t seen that. Would you please post proof of that statement?

You have to take his word for it. We pulled the comment as SS bait.

[El Sordo]

I've seen too many “Someone posted something about something on a different thread so therefore it's true...” statements. So I tend to lean towards the cautionary side of things. Than and I'm just old and cranky. You should see what I do when people misuse contractions and apostrophes.

[wintertime]

Ann Coulter should eat this along with a side dish of crow.

[rolling_stone]

Nice example, I would like to see the same type comparison between the Nordyke twins two BC’s and Obamas....any takers?

[CynicalBear]

Ah ha! Loose lips and all of that. Don’t let frustrations get through your keyboard as they say.

[Admin Moderator]

P.S. She’s also banned.

[Beckwith]

I do this for my love of Conservatism and my very real care for FR.

Cue the violins!

[Tex-Con-Man]

I’ll give Alex Jones a “webhit” in her memory.

[noinfringers2]

It seems to me that what needs to be in the discussion is that first generation born can or cannot be eligible for POTUSA depending on if parentS have or have not been naturalized before the birth birth. My brother and I came under this dilemma because our father and mother were immigrants and not naturalized. No problem being just citizens and serving in WWII.

[Aliska]

Thanks for the great effort you put in that. Point is well made, and I'm allowing for certain margins of error. I do think the wnd letter differences are more pronounced, but there may have been more scanning iterations, and I can't look behind the curtain and see the exact processes used and am further hampered by the fact that I don't have any grasp of Illustrator or how .pdf documents are prepared for the web. If I had to put one together, I'd figure out how on the fly like I do most everything else because you can get lost in the details and minutiae and not get what you want done.

All my software apps I learned like that, just decided to do it and did it. Adobe products like Photoshop are not intuitive, and it was tutorials that got me started, help on the web and just playing with the various features. I finally took a course in CS2 but have forgotten features I don't use regularly.

[ml/nj]

I would like to see the same type comparison between the Nordyke twins two BC’s and Obamas

The problem with the Nordyke BCs is that, SFAIK, they have never been posted in sufficient density to allow for this sort of analysis.

ML/NJ

[TigersEye]

Good observation, but one doesn't have to post on a matter to be interested in it.

He was bitching about others posting on this subject and not on the others which he doesn't bother to post on so, yes, he does have to post on them to have any credibility. As an anti-birther troll yourself you know that.

[Brown Deer]

I believe that the further analysis helps to reinforce the exposure of the fraud, since it does not show any variance in fonts. You will find the same evidence in the Nordyke certificates which would have been processed at the same time, yet are inconsistent with the 0bama BC.

[TigersEye]

Why don’t you address your questions to the guys at Langley.

Because you're the one making the false assertions here. The 'guys at Langley' aren't here posting BS.

[justiceseeker93]

That is saying that only 2nd generation Americans, and born on US soil, are "Natural Born Citizens."

Not exactly. A first generation American born on US soil could possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen," but if and only if that first generation American's immigrant parents were naturalized as American citizens before he or she were born here.

Any child born in the USA is a "Natural Born Citizen" irrespective of the parental heritage. That is what the REAL law says...

You are nothing but a deliberate liar! Cite me the "REAL" law that says that any child born in the USA is a "Natural Born Citizen." There is none! Not all native born citizens are Natural Born Citizens!

The Framers of the Constitution knew exactly what "Natural Born Citizen" meant and what "Natural Born Citizen" didn't mean, because they had read the writings of Vattel, the "dude" to whom you refer.

The Constitution is what it is, not what you Obamatons and trolls would like it to be! And yes, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land!

[TigersEye]

I am not suggesting anything at all ~ just pointing out a logical fallacy in the earlier argument which is that EVERYTHING WAS TYPED AT ONE TIME ON ONE MACHINE.

Yes, you did suggest something, that the form was filled out on different machines at different times. But the discrepancies appear on the same lines and within the same words. Either your speculation is BS or they switched machines in the middle of individual words. There is no other way to explain it.

[TigersEye]

I've noticed that. Instead she wants everyone to believe that all the typists in the clerical pool down at the Hawaii DOH back in 1961 would routinely run around half-typing documents, jumping around from typewriter to typewriter.

Maybe that's the Island way of doing things. They Hula Dance in the office from typewriter to typewriter with Mai Tais in hand. LOL