My only question if I were put to the task in front of each and every candidate would be what is their stand on Islam in America.
Do you believe Islam and Sharia laws should be allowed in America? And what will you do about what has infiltrated our government so far?
To me THAT is all I need to support our future leaders.
I believe Islam should be given a “Do Not Disturb” sign notice.They are NOT welcome in America.
Herman Cain: “If you had it to do over again, would you still have supported TARP?”
I have one question and one question only for all of the candidates:
Under the SCOTUS decisions in 2008 in DC v. Heller and in 2010 in McDonald v. Chicago, the 2nd Amendment was found to be a Fundamental Right of the People. Given these decisions, if elected, will you work to repeal the infringing laws on the books now such as the machine gun ban, sporting purpose clause, and others and will you uphold the 2nd Amendment by not passing any laws that place a burden, restriction or requirement on law abiding gun owners? Please answer with a yes or no.
The question to Gov. Palin is so irritating. She explained very clearly why she resigned her governors positions.
I have a question for all reporters...Does your IQ extend all the way into double digits?
Most of the questions have nothing to do with how the person would do as President. These are simply questions trying to put folks on the spot. This media guy will not support any of these candidates under any circumstances, so what he wants to hear answered is irrelevant because he has an agenda that has nothing to do with determining fitness for office.
Didn't she already answer this? Many times? Apparently, the writer does not believe the answer given. I submit this is a pointless exercise because the writer would simply reject answers to any of the questions posed in the article.
Look at the range of questions by this RomneyBOT.
Softball to little Mitt: Do you compete in Iowa?
Actually, I’d challenge each candidate to submit a one page resume for the job of President.
So the question becomes do we give them a job description or do we let them submit the resume based on what they think are the highest priorities of the job and how they qualify to meet those priorities.
How about asking them each a question that would force them to declare their real allegiance—to government, or to CONSTITUTIONAL government? For example...
1) What would you do to permanently prevent situations like that which happened to the plaintiff in Kelo v. New London?
2) Where do you stand in the debate over Gonzales v. Reich, with the majority or minority?
3) Can the federal government force people to buy health insurance, and was Judge Vinson wrong about the Obamacare severability clause?
If they pretend they don’t know any of those cases, they don’t belong in public office.
If they don’t have an answer ready, they don’t belong in public office.
If they stand with the majority in the first two cases, or answer in the positive to either issue posed in the last question, they don’t belong in public office.
Of course, the Slimes doesn’t care if they belong to the big government party, as they are not at all interested in limiting big government. So the questions they pose are fluffy non-issue questions, bent on making 2012 about flag burning and National Enquirer b.s. Palin’s is a particularly softball one, all about making her the front runner, because the press loves having something be sexy about politics for once, no matter how much they profess to hate her.
Pawlenty - Were you against regulating greenhouse gases before you were for it, now that you are against it?
Palin - If Katie Couric were sitting here right now and you had 30 seconds, what would you say to her?
Newt - What are the three qualities that would be most important to you in a fourth wife?
Santorum - Just how in the hell did you, as an incumbent, get beaten by a walking mannequin like Bob Casey by such a wide margin?
Romney - Why do you suppose that wait times to see a doctor in Massachusetts are now longer than those in Quebec?
Perry - In 500 words or less, explain why it is Conservative to issue an Executive Order mandating that all women between 13-21 in your state be immunized with Gardisil.
Paul - Any truth to the rumor that if elected Alex Jones would be your choice for White House Press Secretary?
Huntsman - Just who in the heck are you again?
Doesn’t even mention Herman Cain.
What are they going to do when he wins South Carolina? (He’ll place 2nd in IA and NH IMHO)
Do you believe that the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and will you enforce it to the best of your ability, and seek to have it amended only where necessary?
I have one question for the author: Why do you say you’re going to ask one question, but instead splice together two questions in a run-on sentence?
I want to ask each one how they would get rid of the millions of illegal aliens and protect our borders.
My question for all the candidates, of any party, no matter what office they may be running for:
Are you still part of the “we” in “”we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men...”?
If the answer is “no,” I have no further questions for the candidate. They are disqualified.
If their answer is “yes,” the follow-on is “what will you do within the lawful jurisdiction of your office to assure that every single person’s God-given, unalienable rights are protected, from the moment of their creation until natural death?”
If they get this right, they’ll get most things right.
If they get this wrong, you can’t trust them on anything.
His Romney question was lame. Why not something related to the absence of military service by he and his family, or his endless flip flops, our banning assault rifles, or Romneycare?
If you could make one change to the constitution what would it be?