Beam me to Planet Gore !
Time for the mayor to say “Freep you!” and make the judge enforce the ruling herself, one birthday party at a time. Show up at a Chicano family’s Quinceanera bash and tell them they can’t party until the Environment approves it, sweetie. That’ll work.
Ummm....it’s California.
Back in 1970 I heard an environmental activist say (on the first Earth Day) that Environmentalism/Ecology was the perfect "cause" because it could justify regulatory (government) control and coordination of EVERYTHING.
And people were cheering this. But I was thinking (dimly) "Wha....?"
Over the years... step by step ... boiling the frogs....
No dancing
No parties
No fireworks
No happiness
The State of California after the Leftist Revolution.
LLS
What is the environmental impact of the judge holding court? and impact of the court building? And impact of the offices of all those lawyers?
We could go back 7 degrees of separation on this.
Bottom line, what is the environmental impact of civilization?
The court’s ruling outlaws PEOPLE!!!!!
The Judge doesn’t like the impact PEOPLE have on the planet!
The PEOPLE “gathering”, is the supposed distinguishing “violation”.
What exactly is the environmental difference between the people collectively vs. individually?
Mike
Seems more like the taliban
WTF?
Kommunists.
its long past time we sold that hellhole to China.
What the state really needs is a Financial Impact study on every law currently on the books and every law proposed.
Too often laws are passed without any consideration on the overall cost to individuals, groups or the state as a whole.
While I will concede (only for the point of argument) that some of these laws are well intentioned, the benefits just as often do not outweigh the cost.
Why should whole industries (such as farming) be put in danger to save the life of one small fish?
Over the course of earth history millions of species have come into being and have gone away.
I do not say we should go out and purposely make a species extinct (such as was done with passenger pigeon) neither should we commit financial suicide to save a species that is too stupid to adapt or is already too far gone to survive.
Environmentalist need to learn that humans are part of the environment.
Environmental laws were never really about the environment. If they were, then the socialists would relish having to comply. But they are now complaining that laws intended only to apply to big evil corporations now also applies to them as well.
As with everything liberal (er, now “progressive”) they were really about self-loathing and suppressing the means by which we became prosperous and powerful.
I say that the law must apply to everyone for everything. Let us have environmental impact statements every time the lawn must be mowed, for every drive to work, and for every bowel movement. I say we must enforce these laws strictly even if SWAT must be used. Maybe sane people can rebuild a correctly functioning society after socialism crashes and burns and everyone with any sense flees from its grasp.
Soon a permit will be needed in California to purchase beans, sauerkraut and brusselsprouts.
America land of the free.
Moonbeam Brown’s friends: Environmentalists and labor unions.
So what about this federal law:
“Congress shall make no law ... [abridging] the right of the people peaceably to assemble”
?
So what about this federal law:
“Congress shall make no law ... [abridging] the right of the people peaceably to assemble”
?