Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

“but no one would think to make special provisions in the law to accomodate their proclivities.”

That’s more or less because of common law, making special laws to focus on many different groups creates serious problems. Having a set law that focuses on everyone is a whole lot better.


36 posted on 05/31/2011 11:44:06 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Morpheus2009

Common law has to be based on a recognized set of basic accepted behavioral values.

Leftists, serving their ideological “father”, have done their best to discredit, destroy, and discard any such set of values because they come from the Objective Source of the law.

You CAN trap them, though, because they certainly wouldn’t want special provisions created for those proclivities I listed, but based on what? They discard our values as simply outdated opinions, or even more unworthy of consideration, “religious reasons”.
What makes THEIR objection to other deviant behavior any more valid? It’s just THEIR opinion over someone else’s, and without an objective reference point, their opinion is no more valid than anyone else’s.


37 posted on 05/31/2011 11:55:25 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Morpheus2009

Another comment -

special laws for special groups, arbitrarily enforced, gives politicians more POWER.

Common laws across the board, equally enforced, takes all the power out of the hands of politicians.


38 posted on 05/31/2011 11:57:47 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson