Common law has to be based on a recognized set of basic accepted behavioral values.
Leftists, serving their ideological “father”, have done their best to discredit, destroy, and discard any such set of values because they come from the Objective Source of the law.
You CAN trap them, though, because they certainly wouldn’t want special provisions created for those proclivities I listed, but based on what? They discard our values as simply outdated opinions, or even more unworthy of consideration, “religious reasons”.
What makes THEIR objection to other deviant behavior any more valid? It’s just THEIR opinion over someone else’s, and without an objective reference point, their opinion is no more valid than anyone else’s.
Leftists, serving their ideological “father”, have done their best to discredit, destroy, and discard any such set of values because they come from the Objective Source of the law.
The objective source of law was a combination of state statutes plus the Supreme Court upholding them as constitutional limits on Freedom of Religion. You’re right about one thing: Go against various things, and plenty of questions have to be asked: I mean, plenty of people don’t marry plenty of people whom they love. I am willing to believe the agenda is pretty much hostile towards whomever would practice polygamy, but then again, their putting a break in the setup which really confirmed that, for the sake of order in our society, just stick to one man, one woman, as the Supreme Court of the United States dictated back in the 19th century.