Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2011 7:31:36 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: randita
WHUPASS
2 posted on 05/28/2011 7:36:53 PM PDT by FrankR (A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita
Sarah Louise Palin

Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI

Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.

3 posted on 05/28/2011 7:39:14 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

how dare she defend herself from blood libel.


4 posted on 05/28/2011 7:40:01 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

Please! What a bunch of dolts and wishful thinking! As it was pointed out early, Palin would be hurting her so call brand if she was playing games by looking like she would run and and then all of a sudden jump out and say “no” I’m not”....people who supported her would just be angry, disappointed and just walk away. There has been nothing in her past that ever suggested that she was such a person


5 posted on 05/28/2011 7:40:41 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

6 posted on 05/28/2011 7:42:17 PM PDT by Brandonmark (News Coverage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

Sounds like this writer needs to take a class, Palin 101. He doesn’t have a clue to her motivations or goals. She is going to announce her candidacy when she wants to, not when they want her to.

She is not going to follow their script and she told them that. That includes hiring their over-priced firms to provide the wrong strategy for her. Her game plan is written and her path to victory is charted and don’t get in her way.


7 posted on 05/28/2011 7:42:44 PM PDT by excopconservative (organize4palin.com (what are you doing to save your country?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

I don’t do what other people do just because they’re doing it anyway, and that includes placing bets on things I have zilch control over.


8 posted on 05/28/2011 7:43:15 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

some Democrats dream fondly of Obama facing Palin across the presidential-debate stage.

I’m sure they do but it would be like having sex
with a praying Mantis, all fun til she bites
your head off.

Hahaha, they don’t even begin to understand what they
are in for.


9 posted on 05/28/2011 7:43:17 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita
Palin may decide that the stars have aligned for her

I think at this point that if she sees any viable path (and I think she does), then she'll run.

But we may know more after her bus tour. If the bus tour is a disaster, that portends one direction. If it's a smashing success, well...

15 posted on 05/28/2011 7:58:35 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

“It is, of course, for precisely this reason that some Democrats dream fondly of Obama facing Palin across the presidential-debate stage. They look at Palin’s tendency to polarize, her high negative ratings and her tendency to make sometimes-confounding public remarks and they tend to share the sentiment that Obama strategist David Plouffe expressed last year: ‘Something tells me we won’t get that lucky’.”

Just a slight drift here. Has the demonic party establishment even hinted at attacking ANY other “so-called” GOP candidate? Even Rick Santorum, the most “hated Republican” in the senate?
No. They haven’t. Wonder why. Because they WANT Sarah to run???? I don’t think so.


16 posted on 05/28/2011 8:11:16 PM PDT by MestaMachine (If you want to pillage,plunder,destroy, blaspheme,or defile, become a muslim, or name yourself obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

From the article: “Asked to give his “gut feeling” about whether Palin will enter the 2012 race, Republican strategist Dan Judy responded: “My gut feeling is that it is impossible to have a gut feeling about Sarah Palin.

Now here is a Republican strategist willing to go out on a limb!


18 posted on 05/28/2011 8:32:27 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

[She may indeed be on the brink of deciding that the presidential race is too enticing to pass up. But it seems just as likely that she has no intention of doing so, and is more interested in using the media attention she gets at moments like these to maintain her profile – and her celebrity. ]

Boy, they really hate her. The implication is that Palin is entirely 110% driven by celebrity and self interest. That’s another meme about to be broken.


19 posted on 05/28/2011 8:39:01 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

There is also the unusually slow-to-solidify nature of the 2012 contest to consider.

“The GOP field is relatively undefined and there is no clear frontrunner,”

Of course. The pubs have learned, if they won’t say it in public, that the Press are active warriors for Obama. They will do anything, print anything, say anything to keep him in power.

If that is the way it is, the first people who declare will get viciously attacked by the MSM. Look how they hate Sarah, because she threatens their darling.

They are all going to keep their heads down until they can’t anymore. The MSM is determined to pick off all challengers for the sake of their love for the One.


21 posted on 05/28/2011 8:56:00 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita
Palin, as she obviously doesn't want to retire permanently from public life, has three possible futures, roughly these:

  1. Don't run for president. Become next Phyllis Schlafly.
  2. Run for president. Lose. Become next Barry Goldwater.
  3. Run for president. Win. Become next Ronald Reagan.
They aren't precise, she'll put her own take on things. But they roughly categorize her potential influence and power in the conservative movement and the party.

Even the trolls here recognize Reagan and his influence. 'Nuff said.

Even though he lost, and lost big, nearly all Freepers will recognize the Goldwater name. He'd have become President in 1965 had not Oswald given LBJ a martyr to ride over him. Those old enough to remember first hand will agree that he continued to be the de facto leader of the conservative movement for years thereafter. His spirit and power wasn't defeated by LBJ, the MSM or elected Democrats. He was only defeated by age... and his second wife.

Now, I have nothing against Mrs. Schlafly. She has done and, at 86, continues to do great things. She's the person most responsible for stopping the ERA. She's a great lady, but I bet that even amongst Freepers there will be many who wouldn't recognize her name.

Given that not running now locks in #1 - time will pass her chances by - how can she not choose the path to #2 or #3. Even if she loses she'll retain more influence than not running will ever provide her.

22 posted on 05/28/2011 8:57:20 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

Plenty of people have placed bets on her running, over at Intrade.


23 posted on 05/28/2011 11:28:27 PM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita

>> Then again, placing bets on Palin’s plans has always been a fast way to lose money.

I love that statement!

God bless you, Sarah Palin.


26 posted on 05/29/2011 12:22:26 AM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson