Posted on 05/25/2011 7:02:17 PM PDT by conservativegramma
Billionaire businessman Donald Trump, who staged a weeks-long public campaign questioning Barack Obama's eligibility to be president during March and April – and rose to the top of the pool of potential candidates for the 2012 GOP nomination then as a result – says he believes the "birth certificate" released by the White House is forged.... Trump said his period of almost-complete silence on the issue following the release by the White House on April 27 of the image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii was not because he was satisfied with the document....
During their conversation, Trump told Corsi his own computer expert told him at the release that it was a computer-generated document.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Keep on posting your ignorant nonsense.
I don't know. I think its the least of our problems.
I don't want to see conservatives fall for every YouTube conspiracy just like the left did. I actually come close to ending friendships over "fire can't melt steal" and "inside job". I see a lot of the same tactics here, and they are vastly closer to Loose Change that to the Dan Rather debunking.
But I guess it's already too late.
I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.
Two lies in one sentence.
Ok. I’ve looked at that first Korean pdf. That entire top row has the same “o”. Then the rest of the doc is different.
IMO this is a clear indication of manipulation. But here’s what I think is happening. They’re using a captcha system. When a character or word is getting kicked, the operator is simply substituting it. FYI Google books (your example) uses a captcha system for their ebook pdfs.
So which issue do you want to debate? You change the subject when your talking point is refuted, but you seem unable to admit it when you fail, epic fail. Just fall back onto that accusing folks of being just like truthers. That must have been crowd tested to have become such a popular new tactic. And it shows someone is getting desperate to stop the exposure of the knyan klown wussy.
I don't know, pick.
Is it fake because it has layers, paths, grayscale vs. binary shading? Take your pick.
First of all, the internet thing everyone is arguing about is not, I repeat, NOT a BC. It doesn’t even claim to be a BC. It does however claim to be an authentic Hawaiian released abstract of at least some of what is on an HI BC. That remains to be proven, legally. The composite junk the white hut and his lying minions have America arguing over IS NOT A BC, NOT A PHOTO COPY OF A BC, and certainly not a legal document so it is not a forgery. It is however an ‘in your face, whitey’ insult meant to be just that, nothing more. What the composite does do is open a crack in the door of discovery, because now we have barry bastard vouching for his composite as an accurate portrayal of a LFBC he claims is held in HAWAII.
It’s patently obvious that “birfers = troofers” is the new phrase de jour to silence people with.
Repeating ad nauseum the same crap which has been shown to be utterly false over and over again.
Who the aitch do they think they are fooling anyway?
LOL! Hasn't been to people who are blind and don't want to see. Those who can see know its been proven fradulent.
Obama is such a deceiver and a liar you should know that WHATEVER he claims is 180 degrees the opposite direction. So if he SAYS its authentic you should know darn well right there its not, simply because he said so. The man cannot tell the truth for God's sake. No conservative should believe a darn thing he says, ever, no matter the subject.
But the most important question to YOU is: When was it proven AUTHENTIC? Where is the forensic examination report of authenticity of the ORIGINAL PAPER 1961 documents? Link?
Don't tell me 'various items', show me your expertise and show me specifically in your words, without pointing to a YouTube movie.
Otherwise bugger off and play cut and paste expert somewhere else.
You first. Show us your expertise in proving an ELECTRONIC copy of a copy of a supposed BC held in the vault in HI is AUTHENTIC. Did you handle it? Have you tested it for age and other variables of authenticity? Without resorting to a YouTube movie of course, use your own words why an electronic copy of a copy is authentic........
The word African being used in the alleged birth certificate is enough to convince me the document is a fraud.
Blacks...Negroes in 20th century Hawaii were classified as Puerto Ricans in the census and on birth certificates.
That's obvious. There's no expertise to show.
You can't even give me once point of fact because I doubt you even understand the concepts being discussed.
Since you know its a forgery, and you claim to be an expert, please explain the white artifacts on the green background (the so-called 'white out' effect). Why are they there?
I've asked a hundred times and can't get a straight answer from any of you. This is consistent with layers being broken up and/or OCR, but not with forging something with a clean background.
Clear the air expert.
Who told you this? This is a new one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.