[GunRunner]

So why doeesn't and didn't Obama do that if he has nothing to hide? Why? And if so, where's the link? Can't find it?

I don't know. I think its the least of our problems.

I don't want to see conservatives fall for every YouTube conspiracy just like the left did. I actually come close to ending friendships over "fire can't melt steal" and "inside job". I see a lot of the same tactics here, and they are vastly closer to Loose Change that to the Dan Rather debunking.

But I guess it's already too late.

I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.

[Brown Deer]

I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.

It most certainly has!

[little jeremiah]

I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.

Two lies in one sentence.

[conservativegramma]

I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.

LOL! Hasn't been to people who are blind and don't want to see. Those who can see know its been proven fradulent.

Obama is such a deceiver and a liar you should know that WHATEVER he claims is 180 degrees the opposite direction. So if he SAYS its authentic you should know darn well right there its not, simply because he said so. The man cannot tell the truth for God's sake. No conservative should believe a darn thing he says, ever, no matter the subject.

But the most important question to YOU is: When was it proven AUTHENTIC? Where is the forensic examination report of authenticity of the ORIGINAL PAPER 1961 documents? Link?

[ml/nj]

I wish the BC could be proven a forgery, but it hasn't been.

Ahem.

Let's do this again:

BAMIE BC II IS AN OBVIOUS FRAUD
 

Note: this is an unretouched image. You can duplicate this simply on your own machine by going to http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf. Once the document opens in your browser, specify that you want to view the document at 1000% (10x) magnification in the little dialog box in the toolbar above the document. Then scroll down about 60% and right about 60% to to get to where you can view the Dunham and Sinclair signatures at the same time.

The different size pixels that make up the two different signatures could not occur in a single scan of an original document. This is prima facie evidence of fraud.

ML/NJ