Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attack on Pakistan will be attack on China -(Paki India source)
http://pakistanchinafriendship.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/attack-on-pakistan-will-be-attack-on-china/ ^ | 5/25/11 | na

Posted on 05/25/2011 7:22:50 AM PDT by Flavius

China has warned in unequivocal terms that any attack on Pakistan would be construed as an attack on China. Beijing has advised Washington to respect Pakistan’s sovereignty and solidarity and this was formally conveyed to the United States at last week’s China-US strategic dialogue and economic talks.

(Excerpt) Read more at pakistanchinafriendship ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2011 7:22:54 AM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Good thing we made China rich and strong, by sending them our factories and all our money.

How’s that “free trade” thing working out, America?


2 posted on 05/25/2011 7:25:00 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

???????????????

Link leads NOWHERE!


3 posted on 05/25/2011 7:28:36 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Really need a source before commenting, credable source, your link lead nowhere.


4 posted on 05/25/2011 7:34:04 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Yes.

This would be VERy serious indeed if they did this.

It is almost equivalent to a declaration of war, given our presence in Afghanistan nd the need for security there as well as an ability to reach out against Islamic maniacs in Pakistan.

And it is WELL within the track record of Red China to do this.


5 posted on 05/25/2011 7:38:06 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Fine then. Impose a 10000% tariff on anything sold by China in the US. Declare any financial obligations to China to be null and void.


6 posted on 05/25/2011 7:40:30 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I say we fly in, kill Mullah Omar tomorrow, and see if they are serious. The longer we wait, the stronger they get.


7 posted on 05/25/2011 7:41:26 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

Chris Matthews said we never went to war with China. When Korea was brought up, he said China was only “involved”. 9,000,000 casualties is a lot of involved.


8 posted on 05/25/2011 7:44:59 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
While China and Russia get ready for war against each other, they constantly saber rattle towards America.

You can bet that the Russians are now concerned that Pakistan is aligned with China against them.

9 posted on 05/25/2011 7:48:45 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama can't see something pure like the truth without wanting to abort it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
'And it is WELL within the track record of Red China to do this'

Not so sure about that, rhetoric yeah, actually going to war with the USA is a bit of a stretch. But I totally agree if true this is very serious and China would not do this in a knee jerk fashion. This would have to have been thought out and gamed first. I'm calling BS on this thread.

10 posted on 05/25/2011 7:49:54 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Impose a 10000% tariff on anything sold by China in the US. Declare any financial obligations to China to be null and void.

If we had a MAN in the Oval Office instead of a testicle-free homo-lovin' sock puppet, we could have these things.

11 posted on 05/25/2011 7:51:26 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I meant the rhetoric.

But in this case the implications are serious.

We are not Taiwan.


12 posted on 05/25/2011 7:52:50 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

So... that means that when the inevitable Islamic revolution comes to Pakistan, the Chinese will see to it that Pakistan’s nukes are NOT handed out freely to the world’s many other Islamic nations?

No?

Didn’t think so.

Thank you, China.


13 posted on 05/25/2011 8:03:43 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I cannot get the link to work. What is the REAL source? An official communique from Bejing to Washington, or the PRC equivalent to a blog?


14 posted on 05/25/2011 8:12:03 AM PDT by Pecos (Constitutionalist. Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Worst

Indian sources


15 posted on 05/25/2011 8:12:40 AM PDT by Flavius (What hopes for victory, Gaius Crastinus? What grounds for encouragement ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Gee, I can’t imagine that India would have an ax to grind there........


16 posted on 05/25/2011 8:23:39 AM PDT by Pecos (Constitutionalist. Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Pakistan in alliance with China might potentially give China a naval port facing the Indian Ocean, along with a transport route through Pakistan to China. This would have far-reaching implications.


17 posted on 05/25/2011 8:25:18 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; admin

Link:

http://pakistanchinafriendship.wordpress.com/


18 posted on 05/25/2011 8:29:54 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
It's like the old propaganda poster of the hostile octopus. China is growing their octopus and another tentacle lashes out across the globe.
19 posted on 05/25/2011 8:31:35 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama can't see something pure like the truth without wanting to abort it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan
" a testicle-free homo-lovin' sock puppet"

*snort* : )

20 posted on 05/25/2011 8:35:43 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson