1 posted on
05/21/2011 5:07:01 AM PDT by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
The law doesn’t apply to him. . . . . he is above the law.
2 posted on
05/21/2011 5:11:15 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(Everything is broken-While zer0 fiddles.)
To: tobyhill
I thought there were no troops on the ground. That changed?
3 posted on
05/21/2011 5:11:23 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Who is John Galt?)
To: tobyhill
To: tobyhill
I think the word missing from the AP thesaurus is “violates”.
5 posted on
05/21/2011 5:12:58 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: tobyhill
To a Leftist, the “law” is whatever you can get away with.
10 posted on
05/21/2011 5:21:45 AM PDT by
fwdude
(Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
To: tobyhill
Would somebody tell me what the “downside” is for not following the Constitution? I’m beginning to wonder if the Constitution “matters” or if it is just another “dead religion”. I know this sounds harsh, but we see this president skirting the Constitution all the time and nothing happens ... just some right wing criticisms ... but no jail time or firing squad. I guess the Constitution has lost it’s teeth?
11 posted on
05/21/2011 5:25:05 AM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
(You are just jealous because the voices aren't talking to YOU!)
To: tobyhill
Where’s our team to object?
To: tobyhill
No surprise in that.There have been so many occasions where this regrime has violated the law, what is one more?
Where are the Republicans? They now control the House?
13 posted on
05/21/2011 5:29:28 AM PDT by
sport
To: tobyhill
I’m “special” and besides, you ugly American’s “have it coming to us” so you all can just suck it and shut up /sarcasm.
So says this Street Punk we have as President.
15 posted on
05/21/2011 5:36:17 AM PDT by
R0CK3T
To: tobyhill
Parody of the Bobby Fuller Four....
I flaunt the law,
and, "The One" won
17 posted on
05/21/2011 5:37:15 AM PDT by
Aevery_Freeman
(What do we do after reelection? The $1,000,000,000.00 fix is in.)
To: tobyhill
What do we need Congress for? We have a king now. The first monarch of Northern America. The people should not rise up against the king, we should be ushering Congress out of office reminding them that kings don't need the approval of the serfs, the king is the law, the king does not go begging for approval.
We should rid ourselves and the king of the parasites in Congress who will not rise in defense of the people that elected them.
There is only the king, we need no other.
Impeach Congress.
22 posted on
05/21/2011 5:57:57 AM PDT by
The Louiswu
(Long Live the King.)
To: tobyhill
“This is not the Congress you are looking for.” (I Be da Won and Can Only Be)
24 posted on
05/21/2011 7:11:15 AM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
To: tobyhill
Mr. Soetoro is taking liberties with the document he swore to protect and defend yet refers to the Constitution as a
"charter of negative liberties". Barry has set a new high for an elected official who holds the Constitution in such low esteem. Maybe Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd should have bequeathed his "pocket version" the Constitution to Barry.
25 posted on
05/21/2011 7:11:36 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: tobyhill
Obama has more in common with Jefferson Davis than he does any American president.
29 posted on
05/21/2011 7:49:17 AM PDT by
Crawdad
To: tobyhill
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a non-binding Joint Resolution intended to restrict the power of the President to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of “a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”[citation needed]
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.
Despite the apparent non-ambiguity of its language, the War Powers Resolution has been regularly ignored by presidents of both parties,[2][3]some even declaring their belief that the act is unconstitutional.[4][5]
30 posted on
05/21/2011 7:49:22 AM PDT by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: tobyhill
He skipped it while he was skipping rope with little girls on the BathHouse lawn.
No news there, really.
32 posted on
05/21/2011 8:15:24 AM PDT by
melancholy
(Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
To: tobyhill
Those stupid Libyans. Don’t they understand that Obama and the Democrats are only killing them because they want them to have better lives?
33 posted on
05/21/2011 8:17:14 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: tobyhill
34 posted on
05/21/2011 9:19:14 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: tobyhill
Congress is gonna have to send their “enforcement agents” after his scrawny butt.
35 posted on
05/21/2011 9:21:31 AM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(An election is not a (national) suicide pact.)
To: All; tobyhill
Congress will support Obama and ignore non-compliance with the War Powers act. They are spineless cowards. These things only apply to Republican presidents.
The press and Obama's Democrat co-conspirators will throw up a fog of "partisanship" and "racism" to give him cover.
Every single one of us should contact our congresspeople and senators, whatever the party, to be heard on this issue.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson