1 posted on
05/12/2011 8:34:50 AM PDT by
Hawk720
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Hawk720
He’s Chris Wallace’s guest on Fox this coming Sunday.
Fox just loves Ron Paul. Last week Chris Wallace suggested he was the father of the tea party.
Blech. FNC just part of the anti American noise.
2 posted on
05/12/2011 8:36:16 AM PDT by
Carley
(We will not tire. We will not falter. We will not fail. W, 9/20/01)
To: Hawk720
3 posted on
05/12/2011 8:36:26 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: Hawk720; Allegra
Anybody want a shrimp cocktail to celebrate ?
4 posted on
05/12/2011 8:36:38 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: Hawk720
If he is an Agency Terminator. I am for him. I want to hear a candidate who will flat out eliminate and terminate Federal Regulatory Agencies.
5 posted on
05/12/2011 8:37:21 AM PDT by
screaminsunshine
(Shut up and eat your Beans!)
To: Hawk720
I can’t wait for Ron Paul’s response when the White House dismisses him as not qualified due to “lack of experience.”
6 posted on
05/12/2011 8:38:38 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: Hawk720
Oh no... not grumpy again...
7 posted on
05/12/2011 8:39:40 AM PDT by
dps.inspect
(the system is rigged...)
To: Hawk720
Good news for crack users everywhere! Oh, and overseas terrorists, too.
9 posted on
05/12/2011 8:41:32 AM PDT by
Right-Wing Champion
(God Bless the USA- Home of the free, because of the brave.)
To: Hawk720
This is another one that I shall pass on.
10 posted on
05/12/2011 8:43:50 AM PDT by
Howie66
(I can see November (2012) from my house.)
To: Hawk720
He'll rake in quite a pile of campaign money for his retirement cache.
11 posted on
05/12/2011 8:43:56 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
To: Hawk720
My biggest problem with the guy is his stance on the Afganistan War. On fiscal issues he is right. I won’t be supporting him in the primary but should he get the nomination, and it’s Paul or Obama?
I’d vote for anyone over Obama.
14 posted on
05/12/2011 8:45:51 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(The nomination of Herman Cain takes more than half the ammo away from the race hustlers)
To: Hawk720
16 posted on
05/12/2011 8:48:12 AM PDT by
Pan_Yan
To: Hawk720
Great. The GOP really needs a Truther like, pro drugs, isolationist candidate running. I don't understand why this guy doesn't run in the Libertarian Party where he belongs and not leach off the GOP apparatus to get his unpopular message out. 1/2 of his ideas are not Conservative or Republican. They are just crazy.
![](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GCgzgmd-4JU/S8auXpYpTqI/AAAAAAAAABE/3e6rpJx5L9k/s320/CrazyRonPaul.jpg)
19 posted on
05/12/2011 8:52:43 AM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Hawk720
![](http://worldredeye.com/wp-content/uploads/massupload/4949453-DSC_4322.JPG)
The oomPauloompas are BACK baby!
(If they just do enough spinning, twisting, flipping, shuckin' and jivin'...he WILL be President!)
20 posted on
05/12/2011 8:53:45 AM PDT by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: Hawk720
The only thing I can see Ron Paul good for is replacing Cass Sustein as the “Regulatory Czar” as Ron would be one of the few people who would undo all of Cass’s insane work.
21 posted on
05/12/2011 8:54:38 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: Hawk720
A completely futile effort. It'll make for interesting debates though which, IMO, is his real goal. After all of his fruitless past endeavors he should know he'll never win.
I say this partly because the Republican Establishment Party (REP) wouldn't stand for it. And they'll try to sabotage Palin again or anybody else who runs who doesn't fit their ideal of what a candidate is supposed to be.
The political right will nominate another McLame candidate.
23 posted on
05/12/2011 9:00:42 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Hawk720
I like Ron Paul’s views on limited government. Problem is, his statements on Israel are just anti-semitic code for “blame the Jews.” Will Pat Buchanan be his running mate? Paul will sell out our only reliable Middle East ally just as fast as the Muslim Marxist.
To: Hawk720
30 posted on
05/12/2011 9:19:10 AM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
To: Hawk720
IMO we should be glad he is running. At least he moves some issues to the right, even if they are super Libertarian. Can anyone tell me one thing he proposes that is unconstitutional? Just asking and am not a Libertarian.
31 posted on
05/12/2011 9:21:44 AM PDT by
w4women
("All great change begins at the dinner table". Ronald Reagan)
To: Hawk720
Yawn.
Another “conservative” who can’t shut his mouth long enough to realize he’s not a serious contender, and that his self-congratulatory “candidacy” will only help obama get elected.
I have libertarian leanings, but Ron Paul needs a nice cup of Shut The Hell Up.
32 posted on
05/12/2011 9:26:43 AM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
To: Hawk720
Another of the usual suspects, I see...
No. No. and again, no.
33 posted on
05/12/2011 9:29:56 AM PDT by
jagusafr
("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson