Posted on 04/29/2011 4:57:43 PM PDT by JosephSmithNAW
If things remain as they are in the Republican Primary field, especially if Sarah decides not to run, then Michelle seems to be a good choice for a conservative to vote for.
Nobody is perfect but she seems okay. Hermain Cain isn't too bad either. Both these people are great conservatives, its just a question of how much support they will be able to get.
No, the problem we have as conservatives is that we have a segment of candy-ass appeasers who are ignorant of history.
You’re right — Allen West is like Chris Christie, but stronger, more attractive, and Black. He has to be able to handle the Cowboy attacks though, after he put his service automatic next to that detainee’s ear and pulled the trigger to find out where the IED was. *I* think that’s GREAT, and it is probably the main reason I think he has the brass ones to do what needs to be done. Others would find it frightening in one with finger on button. He just has to play it right, don’t apologize, don’t let the media keep asking and asking and asking about it.
No, you miss the point. Free people, as long as they don’t misuse them, should be allowed to own and possess any weapon they desire.
Where is hunting mentioned in the Second Amendment?
It isn't.
It also isn't called the Bill of Needs. It is the Bill of Rights.
You apparently cannot read or reason and don't have a single clue about weapons.
Typical Romneybot.
Your little wee ignorant ass got busted and now you lie and call it "sarcasm".
LOL!
Maybe you should stay away from "big boy" discussions.
Americans did not agree to have obama as their obama as their President. Traitors, American haters, and people that voted who happen to live in the United States agreed to have obama as their President. I despise them for inflicting him on me and hope that they get a belly full of him.
Wow...really, check yourself into a clinic or something. I hated the results as well, but he is our POTUS until he isn’t. Americans elected him and as Americans we can elect someone else, but rest assured he is the POTUS and elected by the American people. To not respect that, quite frankly, is UNAMERICAN by you
Wow...really, check yourself into a clinic or something. I hated the results as well, but he is our POTUS until he isn’t. Americans elected him and as Americans we can elect someone else, but rest assured he is the POTUS and elected by the American people. To not respect that, quite frankly, is UNAMERICAN by you
Oh sure, it’s a great idea to have every Tom and Jane on the street have a nuclear suitcase weapon, you know as long as they are cool about not misusing it. Maybe a stinger missile or a Anthrax for everyone, too.
Wow...just wow.
Right..as a small business owner, anti-union, pro tea party member, I sure fit the mold of a communist. You got me (heavy sarcasm).
It just dawned on me that common sense doesn’t fit into your dogma. There is no need for SOME of these weapons to be in the hands of non-military personnel. Taking away some of these assault weapons will do NOTHING to your personal rights to arm yourself, hunt, defend your property, etc. Nothing.
I doubt you really know what you believe.
From your insipid posts on this topic, it's obvious you're way over your head here.
"Common sense" gun control, where have I heard that loaded phrase? Oh that's right from the communists who want to disarm the citizenry.
You're just another concern troll.
Once again Fred it is the BILL OF RIGHTS not BILL OF NEEDS.
The word “infringed” should mean the same in Liberalville as it does in Texas.
You still haven’t looked at the ban bill have you?
For that matter you still haven’t read or cannot understand the Second Amendment.
Your fear of guns should not ever affect anyone’s RIGHT to own them.
Actually I have no desire to disarm the country at all. I OWN A GUN...why would I want to disarm myself? Good grief.
That being said, I don’t think citizens should have military style assault weapons. You disagree. That doesn’t make me a communist or you the supreme commander.
We’ll agree to disagree.
Eaker, I have no fear of guns...I own one. Maybe you should get your facts straight before pretending to know where people are on the subject.
Incidentally, at what point is it enough? Stinger missile? Flame thrower? Etc? Do you draw the line anywhere?
LOL!
The old should everyone be allowed to have a nuclear bomb in their basement argument.
I don’t know about a stinger missile but legally there is no problem with me owning a cannon or flame thrower or a full auto weapon. See the assault weapon ban doesn’t apply to these items just semi auto’s like a .22 rifle.
This is what I mean by you needing to do some research.
It’s probably a silly argument, but I’d tend to think “arms” should be stuff one person can reasonably be expected to be able to carry. Arms, carry. See?
Like I said, it’s probably silly.
What you said but to be equal to what a front line infantry man is expected to carry on today’s battlefield.
Not a single shot .22 for hunting rabbits like gun grabbers want it to mean.
Actually, “not to be infringed” really does mean what it says.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.