Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker

It just dawned on me that common sense doesn’t fit into your dogma. There is no need for SOME of these weapons to be in the hands of non-military personnel. Taking away some of these assault weapons will do NOTHING to your personal rights to arm yourself, hunt, defend your property, etc. Nothing.


152 posted on 05/01/2011 8:38:29 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: SideoutFred
It just dawned on me that common sense doesn’t fit into your dogma.

"Common sense" gun control, where have I heard that loaded phrase? Oh that's right from the communists who want to disarm the citizenry.

You're just another concern troll.

154 posted on 05/02/2011 9:02:38 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (I'm sick of damn idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: SideoutFred

Once again Fred it is the BILL OF RIGHTS not BILL OF NEEDS.

The word “infringed” should mean the same in Liberalville as it does in Texas.

You still haven’t looked at the ban bill have you?

For that matter you still haven’t read or cannot understand the Second Amendment.

Your fear of guns should not ever affect anyone’s RIGHT to own them.


155 posted on 05/02/2011 9:34:23 AM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson