Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/27/2011 4:09:53 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Para-Ord.45

Another UFO shot down I guess...


2 posted on 04/27/2011 4:13:33 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

they’ve been against the birth issue since the get go just like some on the right and all the corrupt biased media.

The establishment elitist GOP are in attack mode against those who raise questions which they have not raised.


3 posted on 04/27/2011 4:14:28 PM PDT by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

NR has been a worthless RINO rag since Buckley departed.


4 posted on 04/27/2011 4:14:28 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (One of these days, Alice....one of these days.....POW!! Right in the kisser!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Replicating this at home depends on the scanner and software used, but the results are typical of a scanner taking the text and saving it as a searchable layer. The reason random letters are left off a layer (which would make no sense if someone was creating this layer-by-layer) is because the scanner simply didn’t pick it up.


6 posted on 04/27/2011 4:18:13 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

If you want to hide something, you’d probably hide everything. Otherwise, you signal what it is that you’re hiding. What’s the possibility that the “hidden” info is elsewhere, and this is just one of the things that got sequestered to provide cover?


8 posted on 04/27/2011 4:24:42 PM PDT by arfingcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
I took the PDF and opened it Illustrator... It has multiple layers. No reason for a scan of a document to divide into these multiple layers unless it has been manipulated in some way. The security paper is on a layer all by itself. This image is bogus. Need to get some experts on this, because the press isn't going to do it. Photobucket
12 posted on 04/27/2011 4:38:36 PM PDT by vortigern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

MuBarak is an idiot to have released this “Copy of Date Points” on a Wednesday!

What moron doesn’t know that if you want a story to die you release it over the weekend or on a holiday?

Further, it may have been enough to convince Lieutenant Lakin to continue following orders of deployment as he had done so many times, honorably, as a decorated veteran would do and does.

But no... He let an honorable man hang in the wind, under a cloud of doubt and ruin his career and life. For What?

This settles nothing and I want to see the one he found among his mother’s belongings when she passed in 1995, as well the one that is sealed in his admissions for kindergarten and preschool.

Barak, if this settles it for you then you screwed a fine man and you should be ashamed!

You have no honor.


13 posted on 04/27/2011 4:40:49 PM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

What horse pucky is this?

In my line of work which involves a lot of document creation, archiving and document control, I have been using scanners, Acrobat, Illustrator, Photoshop and various other software and hardware for many years.

If you simply scan a document that is rendered as a PDF, there are no layers created. The entire document created is an image (no actual text content).

Now if OCR was used, Acrobat will try to render that text in the nearest font available on the system and will recreate the text in a layer using that font. But this doesn’t explain the signatures where no font can match.

Sorry, but I’m not buying this document as being authentic. It was clearly manipulated.

The green safety background has a color gradient similar to a JPEG image. This is clearly an overlay and not part of the original document. This is also supported by the information in the file header (numerous “mask” entries).

In contrast, most of the text is pixelated as a 2-color (B&W) bitmap. The black text also has a thin white border around it as though contrast was increased, after a bitmapped text layer was merged to the background.

FAKE!


14 posted on 04/27/2011 4:43:18 PM PDT by Outland (Ping me when the revolution starts. Anything less won't fix this mess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

“He’s dead, Jim”

the question raised about the hospital name has also been debunked. the people coming up with this nitpicky stuff are digging themselves into deeper and deeper holes full of crap

http://www.favstocks.com/layering-obamas-new-colb-raises-more-questions-than-it-answers/2750560/

Here is Mitchell Owens’ explanation:

“The website for the hospital you cite states merely that the Kapiolani Maternity Home was founded in 1890 and merged in 1978 with another hospital. However, according to the 1962 “American Directory of Obstetricians & Gynecologists” (pages 105, 132, and 202), the Kapiolani Maternity Home was indeed renamed the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital, certainly prior to 1962, when the book was published. That name change is also cited in a book published three years before the President’s birth: “Social Service in Hawaii” by Margaret Mary Louise Catton (Pacific Book Publishers, 1959), In it the hospital’s name change from Kapiolani Maternity Home to Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital is cited on page 103. Two other books, “Social Process in Hawaii: Volume 32” (University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1989) and “The Health of Native Hawaiians” by Eldon L. Wegner (University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1989), both state that in the hospital’s “charter was amended to change the organization’s name to Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.” This name change took place prior to 1950, according to the “Hawaii Medical Journal,” Volume 10 (published 1950), which calls the hospital the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital on pages 53, 129, and 453. “

“Game over.”


16 posted on 04/27/2011 4:47:05 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

People are really obsessed with proving Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate. Is that really healthy?


21 posted on 04/27/2011 4:59:03 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

100% false.

No OCR or scanning app creates layers in any form or fashion.


22 posted on 04/27/2011 5:01:22 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Impeach Obama & try him for treason / Homosexuals reject diversity / Unions finally caught for theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
Here's the way I see it. Yep, it is probably a forgery, but at the same time this is a huge victory for our side. Trump is calling it a victory and for good reason. We forced the SOB to produce a long form BC, even if it is a fake, despite his best effort to never produce one. We know he is hiding something, otherwise why spend millions on court costs in order NOT to release something he had all the time?

Proving this is a forgery is probably not possible, the government has had 2.5 years to work on it, so the best thing to do is declare a victory, and start pushing for his other records to be produced(school records, etc.).

34 posted on 04/27/2011 5:41:06 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
It’s likely that whoever scanned the birth certificate in Hawaii forgot to turn off the OCR setting on the scanner. Let’s leave it at that.

That would be sloppy indeed.

When I dissected the PDF (try "pdfimages -j"), I was very surprised to find the separate parts. While it's conceivable that an OCR setting perhaps created those, it's certainly not the first explanation that came to mind.

Whoever at the White House decided to use a PDF for a simple image made a major error. Releasing this particular PDF, which clearly is not a clean one, was an incredible blunder, no matter how the various parts were inserted into it.

Next time, I hope the technology dunces at the White House stick with something like a simple JPEG. What they released here just adds fat to the fire from a forensic viewpoint.

39 posted on 04/27/2011 6:10:07 PM PDT by snowsislander (The Nigerian 419 scammers must be envious of what this Kenyan fraud has accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Everyone should know by now that the established rules of science and physics don’t apply to Obama or his magically appearing documentation.


45 posted on 04/27/2011 6:37:24 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. -- John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

So, the explanation is that OCR caused the layers but wavy lines and random junk was picked up by OCR ? I think random lines and junk could be added on purpose to make a document look more authentic and aged.


95 posted on 04/28/2011 8:31:26 PM PDT by Bigjimslade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Guess we’re back to square one — if he shows the actual birth certificate, it’s all cleared up. Duh. Easy and simple.


97 posted on 04/30/2011 6:44:29 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

How about I mail you the photo of a check?


98 posted on 04/30/2011 6:45:08 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson