Posted on 04/25/2011 4:34:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
Maybe he will mention it in part 2
weasel words - used to intentionally deceive.
The actual document has to stay in the records vault, true enough. However, a certified copy of that document (like the Nordyke document) can be obtained for a minimal fee.
IMO - that article is an indication of the weakness of the position of those that want to conceal the records, and the complicity of the press.
Seems from your About page that you’re an anti-birther crackpot. You have a good day, now, and keep those meds close at hand.
Bump it.
The Hawaiian long form birth certificate circa 1961, has a space requiring the “Island, State, or FOREIGN COUNTRY” of each parent’s birth. THIS is the sticky-wicket for Obama, and why the original birth certificate being produced is so important. The birth certificate is a legal document, as opposed to hearsay. IF the named father is Barack Hussein Obama, birthplace Kenya, the only possibility of Barry being a natural born citizen would be if he could produce documented proof that ‘Senior’ became a naturalized US citizen prior to Barry’s 8/04/61 birth.
Never happened - and the whole world knows it never happened. Barry’s only defense: launch a campaign of vilification against any who dare to challenge him and his pathetic lying narcissism.
The date the birth certificate was signed for release was May 5, 1966. The date of birth of Susan Nordyke was August 5, 1961, the day after Obama was born.
The posse is closing in on these clowns. Why should asking the President of the United States to present his long form birth certificate be considered outrageous or nuts? These anti-birthers are besides themselves. The jig is up.
Thanks for posting this -
[As relates to my comment #66, re: Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth, circa 1961]
Box 8: Name of Father
Box 9: Race of Father
Box 10: Age of Father
Box 11: Birthplace (Island, State, or FOREIGN COUNTRY)
I don't think that's correct. His putative father was a British subject, and thus could not confer US citizenship on him. His mother was 18, and therefore had not lived in the US for 5 years subsequent to her 15th birthday. She could not confer US citizenship on him. At birth, then, I believe that he was a British subject.
Subsequently he apparently became an Indonesian citizen. We have had no evidence he was ever naturalized as a US citizen.
Yes, and that fact brings forward another question. Why? Who removed it? There is also the question of why Obozo's name was removed from his mother's passport and referenced as filed seperately. That had to be to build a plausible case for his U.S. citizenship. All of that is missing too.
Your logic is correct, but I suspect that BHO, Sr. is not BHO, Jr.’s biological son. The only way he could be a NBC is if someone other than BHO, Sr. was his father.
In the beginning I totally discounted that possibility but have since seen evidence that it is possible.
There are too many pieces in his paper trail that do not fit. His life story is a complete fabrication, he is a total Fraud.
The real question is who put this post turtle where he is? That is the real puzzle. The perps are certainly in the Anti-American elements in the U.S. and abroad. This was planned and the people behind this are much larger than Soros.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.