http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x189/ezmoney1/HawiianBirthCertificate.jpg
It contains the hospital, doctor's name and race of parents. It does not list their religion.
Posted on 04/25/2011 4:34:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
I'll believe this represents something other than stirring the pot for site traffic when it's confirmed that this also appeared in print and not solely online.
I live in the country, it’s almost 8 PM, I’m in for the night. If this appeared in print, wonderful. I really don’t believe that it did, though.
I have a feeling that Doctor is going to be exonerated, reinstated and honored by the next President. Possibly as her first official act after taking office.
The Donald is making it OK to be a birther
In addition, isn’t it true that the Common Law definition of Natural Born Citizen includes:
1) Birth in the Country, AND
2) Mother and Father both naturalized citizens of said country?
Doesn’t Barry Soetoro fail #2, because his Father was a British subject?
That’s a simpler more direct attack, and doesn’t rely on any birth record whatsoever.
Chester A. Arthur (1829–1886), 21st president of the United States, was rumored to have been born in Canada.[39][40] This was never demonstrated by his Democratic opponents, although Arthur Hinman, an attorney who had investigated Arthur’s family history, raised the objection during his vice-presidential campaign and after the end of his Presidency. Arthur was born in Vermont to a U.S. citizen mother and a father from Ireland, who was eventually naturalized as a U.S. citizen. Despite the fact that his parents took up residence in the United States somewhere between 1822 and 1824,[41] Chester Arthur additionally began to claim between 1870 and 1880[42] that he had been born in 1830, rather than in 1829, which only caused minor confusion and was even used in several publications.[43] Arthur was sworn in as president when President Garfield died after being shot. Since his Irish father William was naturalized 14 years after Chester Arthur’s birth,[44] his citizenship status at birth is unclear, because he was born before the 1868 ratification of the 14th Amendment, which provided that any person born on United States territory and being subject to the jurisdiction thereof was considered a born U.S. citizen, and because he was a British subject at birth by patrilineal jus sanguinis.[45] Arthur’s natural-born citizenship status is therefore equally unclear.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Born_Citizen_Clause
On #2, I believe natural born citizen means born here in the states or territory to parents that were either citizen by birth or one was naturalized and the other was born here
Since Daddy 0bama was a Kenyan subject of the British Crown, doesn’t that disqualify him from “Natural Born Citizen” status all by itself?
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x189/ezmoney1/HawiianBirthCertificate.jpg
It contains the hospital, doctor's name and race of parents. It does not list their religion.
Right - for exactly the same reason - he’s not a second generation citizen. With all respect to yourself, the founders put that requirement because 1st gen citizens are more likely to harbour allegience to other countries/princes/etc.
the former gov. of California is a naturalized citizen...he was not born in this country.
Now that didn’t seem to be too difficult - so where’s Obama’s???
ruh roh
Yessir, it certainly is! My goodness. Times have changed.
It lists Caucasian as race, which is white. 0bama’s fake COLB lists his father as African, which is not a race, because an African can also be white
The true depth of this treasonous scandal is yet to be revealed.
It helps to remember that the Clinton-Bush coziness goes back to the days of Iran-Contra, when Papa Bush was supervising covert arms shipments to Latin America out of Arkansas (with drugs making the return trip) and Governor Clinton was busy looking the other way. Further, as was clear during abortive Republican investigations into various Clinton scandals, in the culture of impunity of Washington, politics stops at corruption's edge. Almost all major corruption is either bipartisan or common enough that one side can effectively blackmail the other.
There is? All anyone has seen have photographs taken at the Obama Campaign headquarters in 2008, by two professional Leftists from 'Factcheck'. This supposedly of a COLB laser-printed from the HI DOH.
Laser printing is for legal documents because the ink is heated and fuses with the paper, making it indelible.
But, what's this? Between when the Daily Kos/Fight the Smears and the Factcheck photograph was taken, the ink in the HI seal eroded at the fold.
The Factcheck COLB is not a laser printed HI DOH document.
The circumstances, which grow more bizarre almost daily, do not pass the smell test or the snicker test, and Obama is allowed to get away with it, especially by the media, which only selectively perform their political watchdog role these days. Unfortunately, because the implications are so ominous for our nation, this is not funny at all.
IBD are good folks.
Do we know if the Nordyke family recently requested that birth certificate, or is it the copy they’ve had since 1961? The reason I’m curious is because, in my Sunday newspaper last weekend, there was an article stating that no one, not even Obama, could obtain a copy of his long-form birth certificate now because Hawaii’s policy is not to release them. But if the Nordykes were able to obtain that copy recently, then that’s obviously a lie.
Of course, if Obama already has a long-form birth certificate in his possession, he needs to show it or explain the reason why not. There’s also the matter of all the money he’s spent to avoid showing it, and all the other questions and problems. So he’s still not off the hook, but I’m just curious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.