Skip to comments.
COMING THIS SUMMER: THE DEVIL AND MS. COULTER! (Ann Coulter's new book, "Demonic" - via Drudge)
www.drudgereportarchives.com ^
| April 19, 2011
| Matt Drudge (links to amazon.com)
Posted on 04/19/2011 5:35:48 PM PDT by RonDog
This announcement was briefly at the top of the Drudge Report earlier today:
COMING THIS SUMMER: THE DEVIL AND MS. COULTER!PUBLISHER ANNOUNCES NEW BOOK FROM NATION'S TOP-SELLING CONSERVATIVE AUTHOR...
DETAILS: NONE.
OBAMA AS SATAN? DEMS CULT OF WICKED? WARNING ON AMERICA'S DISINTEGRATION?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; demonic; drudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
To: Aurorales
61
posted on
04/20/2011 10:24:13 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
Check your born on date....then check mine.
Right?
62
posted on
04/20/2011 11:41:30 AM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
To: Aurorales; wintertime
Inquiring minds regarding the eligibility issue simply want the truth to come out.. That's true. But at this point, with Obama having elected and inaugurated, "It is what it is."
I unambiguously favor a law in every state which would enable private citizens to adduce evidence questioning the "natural born citizen" status of anyone who runs in a primary for president (or, if such a thing existed, vice president). And I similarly favor a law in every state which would enable private citizens to adduce evidence questioning the "natural born citizen" status of anyone who runs in a general election for president or vice president. Such challenges could include claims that the individual was born outside the country, was born of foreigners not subject to the laws of the US, or claims that the individual in question became a citizen of some other country. Such claims would be subject to definite standards of proof, and if vindicated in court would deny the individual the right to be on the ballot, or to have write-in votes counted.
That is a no-brainer, and anyone who opposes such provisions (or prefers to delay their effectivity until after 2012) doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Taking the leap from that to supporting Trump is just that, a leap. It is hyperbole - but the example of Governor Schwartzenegger is certainly chilling.
Ann has been downright insulting to many Americans who believe something just isnt right with Barrys background.And that is gratuitous. Let's face it - any number of immigrants to America would make a better POTUS than Jimmy Carter, let alone Obama. That just isn't a very high bar. And nobody ever questioned the "natural born citizen" status of Jimmy Carter. So the "natural born" question is in a real sense a cop-out from the real question of why we can't always elect people whose mission is "to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." That question is far more fundamental than a mere birth certificate check.
To: RonDog
I wish her audio books were un-abridged. I listen to the radio to and from work and on long drives.
I got ‘Liberal Fasicism” and it was un-abridged...it was also 16 hours long. It kept me company on many a long drive.
64
posted on
04/20/2011 3:09:24 PM PDT
by
Yorlik803
(better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
That's true. But at this point, with Obama having elected and inaugurated, “It is what it is.”
nobody ever questioned the “natural born citizen” status of Jimmy ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No it isn't “...what it is.
Anyone who loves this nation and stands with the Constitution and the rule of law will do all that they can to have Obama exposed for the usurper that he likely is. They will do it even if it is a lost cause. They will do it so that a precident will not be set for another unvetted occupant of the White House.
Anyone who pushes the idea that we should just let Obama slide by because beguiled voters gave him a majority is, in my opinion, someone with very dubious loyalty to the Constitution and the rule of law.
Regarding Jimmy Carter:
His natural born citizenship was absolutely self-evident!
Armies of witnesses ( relatives, friends, neighbors,) stood ready to testify of Carter's origins and that of his parents. These are people who knew the parents well, who attended baby showers and the christening, who visited the mom in the hospital and brought meals and gifts over to the new mom and baby. They watched Carter grow to maturity. And....It was manifestly self-evident that Carter, if asked, could provide a certifiable paper trail.
Since Obama doesn't have this highest standard of having Americans ready and willing to stand as witnesses for him, his birth origin, the background of his parents, and his walk through life, it is reasonable to ask him for certifiable proof that he is, indeed, a natural born citizen. We don't really know if he is even a citizen!
Fact: A **REAL** natural born citizen of America would be **HONORED** to prove with all of the very best evidence that he was a natural born citizen and eligible to be Commander in Chief. He would be especially **PLEASED** to do this for anyone in the military.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
The Constitution says what it says regarding eligibility for the Presidency for a reason.
I’m sorry, but saying “It is what it is”, because Barry was elected is flat out wrong.
We either follow our laws or not. No one is above the law. This of course includes the unknown entity who occupies our White House right now.
Letting Barry get away with this garbage is just all sorts of wrong. I love this Country. I believe I and every other American deserves to know the truth. Here and now.
66
posted on
04/20/2011 4:43:06 PM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
To: Aurorales
The date people have attached to their nic is meaningless A. There are trolls like you with 1998 start dates. IF you’ve been around so long why haven’t I seen you’re nic? I’m here everyday, posting on these same type of threads.
67
posted on
04/21/2011 5:33:48 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
Why don’t you check my postings. They go back to 2000.
I don’t really give a care if you know me or not. Your argument is moot.
I have been donating to this site for years.
But I guess I can fake that on the donation page as well.
You just don’t want to look because you don’t want to know the real answer because it would blow your whole “troll” argument out of the water.
Anyone who doesn’t want to check the facts shouldn’t be throwing out baseless accusations.
68
posted on
04/21/2011 5:09:56 PM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
To: Aurorales
Okay, maybe you aren’t a troll. How about respecting the other FReepers and stop hijacking the Coulter threads?
69
posted on
04/22/2011 9:12:22 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
No hijacking going on from my end.
This was a thread about Ann’s new book and I stated my opinion of not liking Ann. Just as other FReepers have on this same thread.
How in the heck is that hijacking?
70
posted on
04/22/2011 1:35:43 PM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
To: RonDog
Not that she's wrong mind you, but this has some irony:
"Among the other topics Miss Coulter will tackle in her book are:
The lefts demonization of its enemies and idolization of its leaders;..."
Perhaps a slightly less inflamatory title would have been better?
71
posted on
04/24/2011 10:25:19 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Aurorales
"Ann has been downright insulting to many Americans who believe something just isnt right with Barrys background." No, she's been insulting to birthers. Not the same thing.
72
posted on
04/24/2011 10:27:19 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: Aurorales
If you look at any Coulter thread for the last 2 years you will see the same people show up to talk about the two sore subjects they have regarding Ann. I can tell you who is going to show up on every thread having to do with her.
You aren’t one it seems, but there are trolls here and they unrelentingly harp on anything but the topic at hand. Every Coulter thread turns into a discussion of the president’s birth certificate or GOProud, the gay GOP club.
It’s the same people every week.
FRANTZIE
Wintertime
UCFRoadWarrior...and a few others. All claim they “used to really like AC, but....”
Look it up if you like-—or just wait until Wed evening.
73
posted on
04/25/2011 11:57:57 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
And your point is what?
You keep throwing the word “troll” around.
It has already been established that I’m no troll. And I dislike Ann Coulter.
I didn’t care for her before her ridicule of concerned citizens re: eligibility. Now I really dislike her.
Ann herself decided to make the eligibility issue....well an issue around her.
If she didn’t ridicule these people, many people wouldn’t ever mention it on these threads.
Coulter’s fault.
It is a fact....many FReepers don’t like Ann. Start an Ann thread and those FReepers might post a comment. As they are allowed to do.
Doesn’t make them a troll or a hijacker.
74
posted on
04/25/2011 12:38:28 PM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
To: Aurorales
Man, you are freaking THICK. I’ll go ahead and add you to the troll list. Thanks for playing. If you want to continue your incessant whining about your pet-issue, feel free. I’m here all day, every day.
75
posted on
04/26/2011 6:31:12 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: subterfuge
And your behavior is egotistical and childish. (Thanks for playing?) Please. Grow up.
Go ahead have the last word. But I guess you need reminding, this is a message board. If you don’t want a response, don’t post anything.
76
posted on
04/26/2011 11:59:55 AM PDT
by
Aurorales
(I will not be ridiculed into silence)
See also, from the
Daily Caller:
11:11 PM 06/06/2011
All he wanted to tell me was No! You need an all black cover. No picture of you on the cover. Your name and the name of the book
9:59 PM 06/06/2011
Of course, as the leader of twelve apostles, even Jesus had more executive experience than Obama
9:56 PM 06/06/2011
Its very title is par for the course for the author of such liberal-bashing classics as Godless and Treason
9:51 PM 06/06/2011
The demon is a mob, and the mob is demonic
9:51 PM 06/06/2011
Page after page, this is liberals, this is not conservatives. We do not turn our political leaders into messiahs
77
posted on
06/07/2011 6:08:17 AM PDT
by
RonDog
78
posted on
06/07/2011 6:47:45 AM PDT
by
RonDog
79
posted on
06/07/2011 7:03:49 AM PDT
by
RonDog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson