yeah??? then get some... 
Posted on 04/19/2011 3:04:46 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
EXPOSED: Pro-Gun Groups Blocked From Arms Trade Treaty Discussions
ALERT: Anti-gun groups are flooding the UN with bucket-loads of cash to make sure the UN Arms Trade Treaty is passed ASAP.
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
Conservatives are fighting tooth and nail to stop the world-wide gun ban. Newly elected Kentucky Senator, Rand Paul, has vowed to fight to end Obama and Hilary Clinton's work with the UN to pass the "Arms Trade Treaty." Paul said, "Disguised as an 'International Arms Control Treaty' to fight against 'terrorism,' 'insurgency' and 'international crime syndicates,' the UN's Small Arms Treaty is in fact a massive, global gun control scheme."
The UN wants to make all firearms subject to international law
The Arms Trade Treaty could:
Prohibit firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. Prohibit any transfer of firearm ownership. Require US citizens to deliver any banned firearms they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. Require micro-stamping on all guns. Destruction of "excess" firearms.
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
According to the Arms Trade Treaty Preparatory Committee, The UN is, "Concerned by the misuse of weaponry around the world, civil society organizations have successfully mobilized governments and parliamentarians to call for the global regulation of the conventional arms trade." It is outrageous to think that when a few violent groups get their hands on guns the UN wants to confiscate firearms from law-abiding U.S. citizens. The UN Arms Trade Treaty is not going to convince terrorists and other violent groups to stop obtaining or using guns. Instead, the Arms Trade Treaty will make turn innocent Americans into sitting ducks for thugs and criminals.
UN Flooded With Funding From Gun-Grabbers
International gun-grabbing groups are already gearing up to present their anti-gun data at the preparatory committee meeting for the new treaty in July. Support for the freedom crushing treaty has received a tsunami of new funding from the think tank Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
According to their website, "SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to search into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. SIPRI is named as one of the world's leading think tanks in Foreign Policy magazine's "Think Tank Index."
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
SIRI received funding from the foreign ministries of Norway and Sweden to research gun running. That funding will be used to for SIRI to engage in "unbiased" discussions at the Arms Trade Treaty meeting in July. One thing is for certain, those discussions will be biased.
While anti-gun groups like SIRI have the red carpet rolled out for them at UN Arms Trade Treaty meetings, pro-gun groups like CCRKBA have been shut out of most of the discussions. In June of 2010, my wife, Julianne Versnel, and I both worked to veto anti-Second Amendment language in the Arms Trade Treaty. We attended as NGO (non-Governmental Organization) delegates. It's no surprise that NGO representatives were told that they would be shut out of most of the meetings.
Clearly, the UN doesn't want anyone interfering with the passage of this bill. We can't win this war against gun rights alone. We need the help of patriots like you to to pledge your support to STOP THE UN FROM ATTACKING YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS!
UN Arms Trade Treaty Will Turn America Into A Police State
The ugly truth is the Arms Trade Treaty will turn America into a total police state. If your firearm manages to squeeze through Obama's red tape, you can bet a new Obama appointed "gun task force" will be tracking the whereabouts of your gun at every moment. The "gun task force" will also be tracking YOU. If you think our government is overreaching now, just see what happens if this treaty is passed.
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
The UN Arms Trade Treaty Will Give Obama & His Cronies Total Control Over Our Lives
Guns protect citizens from governments that abuse their power. From never ending spending binges, unbridled corruption and rampant tax hikes, it's clear that our government is already oppressing us. If our guns are gone, there will be no end to the abuse from our gangster government. If this treaty is implemented the free will of you and every other American will be destroyed.
And that's not all. If two-thirds of the Senate votes in favor of this treaty it will become global law. Two-thirds of the Senate isn't a big number. Please take action and help CCRKBA flood Congress with faxes opposing the UN Arms Trade Treaty.
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
IF THE UNITED STATES SIGNS THIS TREATY AND IT IS RATIFIED BY THE U.S. SENATE, THE UN ARMS TRADE TREATY WILL BECOME THE LAW!
Get Your Free Stickers STOP the UN Arms Trade Treaty Fax All 100 Senators and Tell Obama to Keep the "Change"
IF THE UN ARMS TRADE TREATY PASSES, INTERNATIONAL PROGRESSIVES WILL BE ABLE TO ASSUME TOTAL CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY
THIS IS NOT A FIGHT WE CAN AFFORD TO LOSE
FAX All 535 CONGRESSMEN Stop The UN Arms Trade Treaty & Defend Your Gun Rights!
Keep calling your Senators today, toll-free numbers include 1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to take guns away!
CALL PRESIDENT OBAMA, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414 expressing your disdain and ABSOLUTE REJECTION of all GUN BANS.
DO NOT BE SILENCED - MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!
NOTE: We need TENS OF THOUSANDS of faxes and PHONE CALLS and EMAILS delivered to ALL Senators - right away!
For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care.
Your contribution of $20 or $25 is urgently needed today. If you can afford to send $50 or $100 or more it would truly be a godsend.
SELECT HERE DONATE NOW The rights you save may be your own!
Remember, protecting our freedom is not inexpensive.
But then, it's impossible to put a price tag on freedom.
Together, we can preserve the Constitutional rights our Founding Fathers intended our people to have forever.
For more information about CCRKBA go to www.CCRKBA.org Thank you. I know I can count on you.
Sincerely,
Alan M. Gottlieb Chairman Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Furthermore, the Constitution says treaties overrule US LAW, not the Constitution.
I would hate to be the guy that gets sent door to door to collect all the guns. That might be a short career....red
I’ll bring al my guns and ammo to the kenyans destruction center. Indeed.
Try enforcing that in Africa or the Middle East.
Oh, that's too difficult? Then enforce it in the law-abiding US when the Supremes are 5-4 Democratic.
I think the thing I hate most about the Dems--and there's a lot to choose from--is the shameless politicization of the Courts and the DOJ under Clinton and O. They would love to have an SJC that would view the half-assed UN resolution of their choice as precedent.
A great weakness of our system is that once something ridiculous is accepted as legal precedent, it is incredibly difficult to unwind.
yeah??? then get some...
“...the Supremes are 5-4 Democratic.”
Uh, source, please?
Pity the poor "blue helmets" sent here to engage in "peacekeeping" operations. May they all have their personal affairs in order before they head this way.
The arrogant left just loves to keep smacking an already pissed off pit bull in the face, doesn’t it.
Well, they aren't right now. But it is my contention that if Obama stays in office, and one of the more conservative justices leaves, he'll appoint a politically motivated, Democratic party-line oriented replacement justice, and then the SJC will vote against the 2nd amendment. I believe I said "when..."
Clear?
Free citizens throughout history have had arms. Only slaves are prohibited from possessing arms.
“Furthermore, the Constitution says treaties overrule US LAW, not the Constitution.”
Well, he Constitution itself is law. What else would it be? Obviously, though, it wouldn’t let itself be superceded by international agreements, it being a fundamental document. Even if the Constitution were replaceable, it is not sovereign. The people are. We retain our rights, with or without law to protect us.
The Constitution.
All US law emanates from the Constitution, much in the same manner as all Commonlaw emanates from the Magna Carta.
“All US law emanates from the Constitution, much in the same manner as all Commonlaw emanates from the Magna Carta”
I strenuously dispute both points, as English and American law most definitely precedes said documents. Perhaps it is true that English constitutional law emanates from the Magna Carta, but common law goes back to time out of mind. Technically defined as predating 1189, or the start of Richard the Lionheart’s reign, “time immemorial” literally stretches all the way back to the Dark Ages of barbarian Germany. That’s how old English law is.
It may be permissible to say that all U.S. law emanates from the Constitution, as of course there was no U.S. before the Constitution. Anyway, the point is though you are free to define the Constitution as “the Constitution,” to the rest of us it is law (or a series of laws, if you will), just like the Magna Carta is law. I’m not sure why you’ve never come across this basic definition.
“...Well, they aren’t right now.”
Clear?
“It may be permissible to say that all U.S. law emanates from the Constitution, as of course there was no U.S. before the Constitution”
I hasten to add that this point is open to further interpretation. A host of laws created under the regime created by the Constition don’t pertain to the Constitution persay. I speak mainly of various judicial precedents, congressional statutes, executive acts, and administrative law, which are can be said to be extra-constitutional. Of course, the argument spins around to the fact that the Constitution empowered these agencies in the first place. Hence, even if they don’t follow the Constitution, whatever they do ultimately derives from the Constitution anyway. But I digress.
“Uh, source, please?”
“Clear?”
I don’t know what your problem is, Farnsworth. The original poster clearly said “Then enforce it [i.e. the global gun ban] in the law-abiding US when the Supremes are 5-4 Democratic.” Notice the word “when,” meaning “at such time as,” or somesuch formulation. I perceived the implication to be that SCOTUS wasn’t now majority liberal, but at some time in the future the UN could use it if it became so.
“which are can be said” = which can be said
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.