Try enforcing that in Africa or the Middle East.
Oh, that's too difficult? Then enforce it in the law-abiding US when the Supremes are 5-4 Democratic.
I think the thing I hate most about the Dems--and there's a lot to choose from--is the shameless politicization of the Courts and the DOJ under Clinton and O. They would love to have an SJC that would view the half-assed UN resolution of their choice as precedent.
A great weakness of our system is that once something ridiculous is accepted as legal precedent, it is incredibly difficult to unwind.
“...the Supremes are 5-4 Democratic.”
Uh, source, please?
As far as I’m concerned, even a 9-0 decision against guns (banning them) by the USSC doesn’t carry any weight against the Second of the Bill of Rights Amendments. This is tantamount to declaring free speech banned. Simply put, it would be war.
As far as I’m concerned, even a 9-0 decision against guns (banning them) by the USSC doesn’t carry any weight against the Second of the Bill of Rights Amendments. This is tantamount to declaring free speech banned. Simply put, it would be war.