[E. Pluribus Unum]

So much for checks-and-balances.

One of these days we'll have to go about checks-and-balances the old fashioned way.

[Uncle Ike]

“Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!!”

We’ve reached the last circle.....

[Windflier]

We need a revolution.

A Supreme Court Justice diddle daddles over the question of how much control the EPA should have over power companies, instead of ruling that she finds no authority in the US Constitution for the EPA to exist at all.

We need a revolution.

[Tulane]

Again — Bush may have had his problems — but thank goodness for Alito and Roberts

[lonevoice]

Scary, damn scary.

[NormsRevenge]

WE'RE DOOMED!

[boomop1]

De-fund the EPA de-fund Tzar's pull the plug on socialism.

[San Jacinto]

According to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, federal judges should stay the hell away from the EPA and stick to the issues they know something about - like gay marriage.

[Red Badger]

Stick a fork in US.
We’re done................

[Art in Idaho]

As I see it, Obama was given two jobs: Destroy the US economy and get as many people dependent on government as possible to 'aid the transition' to socialism/communism/one world government. So far he's done a lot of damage. . .

[lewislynn]

"Congress set up the EPA to promulgate standards for emissions, and the relief you're seeking seems to me to set up a district judge, who does not have the resources, the expertise, as a kind of super EPA," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Tuesday.

IOW, it's not up to the court to fix the mess Congress created, it's up to Congress...

Good luck with that in this all talk, no action, weak-kneed bunch.

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

Frankly, I lost interest in all this blah blah blah after a couple of paragraphs.

I take it we lost the case.

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

"Congress set up the EPA to promulgate standards for emissions, and the relief you're seeking seems to me to set up a district judge, who does not have the resources, the expertise, as a kind of super EPA," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Tuesday.

And yet the Supreme Court itself, which does not have the resources or expertise, felt itself qualified to rule carbon dioxide to be a greenhouse gas fully subject to regulation by the EPA.

[Talisker]

The case comes after the Supreme Court ruled in 2009 that greenhouse-gas emissions could be regulated under the Clean Air Act if EPA found they endanger public health and welfare. The high court's decision formed the underpinning for its authority to issue climate regulations.

In this ruling the Court indicated that the method they would hear to overthrow EPA greenhouse gas nonsense was by arguing empirical evidence for the lack of harm. That's the way they want to go, and that's what should be argued, because the scientific evidence is overwhelming that there is no harm from the release of these gases by human sources, compared to their release by natural sources and their overall amounts anyway.

Instead, we get a suit over State or EPA control over power companies. It's a setup to fail.

[mmercier]

At this present point in time it is imperative and primary that every mechanism of established order executes every power available to disrupt civilization via any means.

This is a necessary thing required for reestablishment of new order. Many understand this. Many more do not. Most are just confused.

[Art in Idaho]

Anyone else feel we're at a tipping point? It feels like "We the People" have to do something soon, or it's all over. November 6, 2012, yeah, I can see it from my house, but damn, it seems like a long way off. . .

[NonValueAdded]

since all parties use the words “climate change” should not there be a motion to dismiss based simply upon the fraud therein represented?

[Raycpa]

Translation: Get someone else to do your dirty work, we aren’t playing.

[ex-Texan]

Masters Of The World Meet To Play God With The Climate

Excerpt:

* * * Economy:  The model of centralized elite banking management has been an abject failure.  All central banks in history that have used fiat money -- most of which financed both sides of wars -- have failed in that they have bankrupted their nations and only have enriched those in control.  The current exposure of the U.S. Federal Reserve is finally reaching a crescendo, but our managers are already a step ahead discussing the endgame of a one-world currency to solve the inadequacies of the past.  I think we have had enough examples of their central planning skills.

Health: Between the EPA, FDA, and USDA -- just to cite U.S. agencies -- our elite researchers, scientists, and policy makers have been responsible for millions of deaths, conservatively.  And it is only getting worse, as this global health tyranny aims to criminalize the food and supplements that are actually proven to extend our lives.  The key poisons they enable include: mercury, aspartame, MSG, (most) vaccines, and GMO's; all proven to reduce cognition, bodily health, and life expectancy.  

Environment: Fukushima is only the latest in a long history of corporate/government mismanagement with global consequences.  Experts claiming to show the benefits and safety of their advice continuously bombard us.   Yet, our planet has now endured multiple nuclear meltdowns, oil spills, fracking-induced earthquakes, and global fallout from wars using depleted uranium -- all of which have contaminated Earth and poisoned future generations beyond imagining.  The only success these elites can document is the mass killing by dictators like Genghis Khan, Mao, Hitler, and Stalin who eliminated a conservative total of over 100 million people, thus reducing CO2.  Well done if you are a nihilist.

With such a track record of desolation for all but the top directors, we had best pay attention to their own words about what direction they have in store for us next.

Most alarming about this semi-clandestine meeting is that the very premise upon which they base this need for global orchestration -- Global Warming -- has been thoroughly debunked by any climatologist not beholden to a government sponsored think tank or agency.  Their famously cited Plan B for inevitable climate change is nothing more than a wish list for those who wish to de-industrialize productive nations and consolidate control through wealth redistribution.  Not a good way to start saving people.  

And Yada, Yada, Yada

[allmendream]

I am confused by the responses here.

This lawsuit, if allowed to continue, would have established that individual States can sue “carbon emitters” (i.e. energy production) in other States based upon a rather dubious claim of harm to the citizens of their State.

Striking down this case is the right thing to do.

Acknowledging the EPA isn’t, but as a mechanism Congress has put in place to regulate interstate commerce such that State A cannot sue to halt energy production in State B, it seems to fit the bill.