Skip to comments.
Wolves to come off endangered list within 60 days
AP ^
| Apr 15 , 2011
Posted on 04/15/2011 5:23:02 PM PDT by george76
Federal wildlife officials say they will take more than 1,300 gray wolves in the Northern Rockies off the endangered species list within 60 days.
It marks the first time Congress has taken a species off the endangered list.
Idaho and Montana plan public wolf hunts this fall. Hunts last year were canceled after a judge ruled the predators remained at risk.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Idaho; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: Montana; US: North Dakota; US: Oregon; US: Washington; US: Wisconsin; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: agenda21; animalrights; ar; esa; graywolves; hunting; sss; unagenda21; wildlife; wolves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
04/15/2011 5:23:06 PM PDT
by
george76
To: jazusamo
Any plans to hunt in Oregon and Washington ?
2
posted on
04/15/2011 5:24:23 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Evolution is dynamic not static.
Artificially choosing some species to save from extinction may “feel good” but it is not how nature works.
3
posted on
04/15/2011 5:32:13 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action President. He's shovel ready!)
To: george76
Any plans to hunt in Oregon and Washington?
I doubt it as the populations are transitory at this point. In Oregon, the State tried to plan for the future by getting the interested parties(eco-freaks and ranchers) together to work out a plan to address a future population, but, that quickly broke up when the eco-freaks were willing to sacrifice every cow, sheep, goat, dog, and cat to protect every wolf from not be able to lead a happy life.
4
posted on
04/15/2011 5:35:16 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Obama makes me yearn for the good ol' days of Carter.)
To: george76
First people complain about wolves and predators being dangerous so we kill them off, then we have an explosion in herd type animals, the same people who wanted the predators gone, now are against hunting, so we introduce back the predators and due to an over abundance of food and animals not use to be hunted their population explodes. Thus we are right back where we started.
5
posted on
04/15/2011 5:37:36 PM PDT
by
LukeL
(Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
To: george76
Since the U.S. government started “seeding” wolves into selected areas, the farmers and land owners have been going crazy from predation caused by wolves who refuse to stay on federal land. Deer and elk herds have also been hard hit. Some USG agencies have introduced the Canadian species of wolf that's even more aggressive than the U.S. version.
Many farmers and landowners have practiced the 3S kind of solution for the government protected species: “shoot, shovel, shut-up.”
6
posted on
04/15/2011 5:38:25 PM PDT
by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
To: george76
I haven't seen a word about that and really doubt it for now, wolf numbers in both states are very low and they couldn't justify a hunt.
It should make a difference though in livestock owners being able to protect their stock. I doubt they'll have to jump through hoops to shoot wolves threatening that stock.
7
posted on
04/15/2011 5:41:36 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: george76
“”Wolves to come off endangered list within 60 days””
It’s about time. I’m tired of eating spotted owl every day.
To: Mikey_1962
“Evolution is dynamic not static.”
When did wolves start evolving? I haven’t heard of them becoming more complex in their DNA or anatomy in any way.
9
posted on
04/15/2011 5:48:11 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: george76
I find this amazing since we’ve been employing “shoot, shovel, and shut up” for years now up here in the rockies!
10
posted on
04/15/2011 5:51:54 PM PDT
by
3boysdad
(Rights of Man)
To: jazusamo
Silence from Donald Molloy ?
11
posted on
04/15/2011 5:52:47 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Kill them all. They bite, kill live stock, game animals. I don’t want them in my yard.
To: george76
Not a word that I’ve seen, he’s probably gulping Valium. LOL!
13
posted on
04/15/2011 6:04:16 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: Mikey_1962
I have no problem with wolves....if they want to wander into the states, let them...
but let people protect themselves from them and if they don't wise up and stay in very remote areas then they deserve to be hunted down like any rabid dog....
I've heard from many sources that the elk in central to northren Idaho have been decimated by wolves, and they simply kill to kill....
14
posted on
04/15/2011 6:04:33 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: george76
And just what part of their best guesses of the wolf population does 1,300 represent; 30%, 20% or less?
After all these years under the protection of the feds, judges and the environ-mental agitators the wolves have had a free lunch or maybe a free breakfast for years at the expensive of the sheep and cattlemen. The program rivals the school lunch programs given to kids....at the taxpayers expense.
I can't even afford a lamb chop anymore.
15
posted on
04/15/2011 6:06:32 PM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin; SJackson
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday that the population of gray wolves in Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin has recovered enough to be removed from federal protection.
About 4,000 wolves roam the three states.
16
posted on
04/15/2011 6:22:08 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: BIGLOOK
Good to hear from you. It has been a while.
Hard to know the wolf numbers. Lots of guessing. Several thousands ?
Wyoming might consider wolf numbers outside of Yellowstone to 10 breeding pairs and 100 animals.
The original government promise was for 300 inside Yellowstone Park only.
17
posted on
04/15/2011 6:35:42 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Wolves are nothing compared to the exploding coyote population. They've so well adapted to human civilization that park rangers on the American River Parkway near my house in Sacramento, CA are on the constant lookout for them--especially for females with pups, since those females can be VERY aggressive protecting those pups.
18
posted on
04/15/2011 7:48:33 PM PDT
by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: LukeL
Allow me to break your informative post into its components.
1. First people complain about wolves and predators being dangerous.
2. so we kill them off.
3. then we have an explosion in herd type animals.
4. the same people who wanted the predators gone, now are against hunting.
#4 is important. Too many Libtard animal whackos.
Continuing:
5. so we introduce back the predators
6. and due to an over abundance of food and animals not use to be hunted their population explodes.
7. Thus we are right back where we started.
#7 is the error. Only if the government trough feeders are allowed to force faulty management premises on those charged with managing the deer herds dooes the cycle begin again.
Should the younger voters force their public servants to use the intelligence and control which human hunters, not wolves, then population levels CAn be managed successfully.
In summation, a recreational, non-commercial season for the taking of Libtards would seem to be a valid solution to direct reduction of that unwanted population.
19
posted on
04/15/2011 7:50:21 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: Jack Hydrazine
When did wolves start evolving? I havent heard of them becoming more complex in their DNA or anatomy in any way. Wow! Evolution which happens over thousands of generations and you haven't heard of it or seen it in your short life span?
At any rate you missed the point of the post: Extinctions are a part of life on Earth and trying to maintain a static ecosystem when by nature they a dynamic is a fools errand.
20
posted on
04/15/2011 11:10:21 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action President. He's shovel ready!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson