Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Let me be crystal clear': Furious female judge orders Wisconsin lawmakers ...
Daily Mail UK ^ | March 30, 2011

Posted on 03/30/2011 6:02:46 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Apparently she was ignored the first time: Maryann Sumi reiterates her temporary restraining order barring further implementation of 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 at the Dane County Courthouse in Madison yesterday

1 posted on 03/30/2011 6:02:52 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Another case of left-wing black robed fever.


2 posted on 03/30/2011 6:05:15 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

GUILTY

pay no attention to the hag behind the screen
who’s she gonna whine to? Eric Holder?


3 posted on 03/30/2011 6:05:43 AM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Can’t Walker simply judge-shop too, as did the unions? This corruptocrat’s son was an official with the AFL-CIO and SEIU and must recuse herself. Just get a different judge to permit the law, and ignore her ruling.


4 posted on 03/30/2011 6:06:31 AM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

85,000 protesters? Where’d that number come from?
Oh, that’s right, the same place as her ruling. ; )


5 posted on 03/30/2011 6:06:47 AM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Y'all had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Can this union shill be recalled?


6 posted on 03/30/2011 6:09:35 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

If one is declared irrelevant, is that the same as being ignored?


7 posted on 03/30/2011 6:10:19 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
"Another case of left-wing black robed fever."

True, but don't you wish that Judge Vinson in the Health Care case had the balls and fervor that his woman has!

8 posted on 03/30/2011 6:10:53 AM PDT by buckalfa (Confused and Bewildered With a Glass Half Empty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“This corruptocrat’s son was an official with the AFL-CIO and SEIU and must recuse herself. Just get a different judge to permit the law, and ignore her ruling.”

Keep in mind that her husband had also contributed thousands of dollars to several of the RATs On The Run.

Is she BIASED?

Does a bear sh*t in the woods?


9 posted on 03/30/2011 6:14:17 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November (2012) from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Things need to be made crystal clear to this thug: she will be impeached and removed from office as soon as the votes are available.

Americans don’t take kindly to judges thinking they are legislators.


10 posted on 03/30/2011 6:14:25 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

If this is the same hag who’s Son works for the unions, Walker should get in front of the press and mention this fact to the public.


11 posted on 03/30/2011 6:14:25 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Let this chant follow BHO everywhere he goes: "You lie. You lie. You lie.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
My chosen headline would be:

Judge thinks she rules Wisconsin, can veto laws duly passed by the people's representatives

12 posted on 03/30/2011 6:14:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

As a student of the constitution it is my opinion that there is a concept of checks and balances. It extends to states.

Usually overlooked today is the check on the judiciary which allows Congress and the Administrative branch to ignore them when the court is off the hook. For that to happen a majority of the legislature must be in agreement or else they can impeach the administrative branch ( pres/gov/whatever ).

The courts have gotten this idea that they are beyond question. They are not and the reason they must never be beyond ignoring is because otherwise they would become the true and unelected rulers of the nation.


13 posted on 03/30/2011 6:14:53 AM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly
85,000 protesters? Where’d that number come from?

85,000 SEIU protesters

A few dozen angry white males listening to Palin/Beck.

14 posted on 03/30/2011 6:16:15 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

15 posted on 03/30/2011 6:17:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

U G L Y

She is Queen of Ugly. Even her Rainbow Happy Star Unicorns of her delusional “judgements” are UGLY.


16 posted on 03/30/2011 6:20:38 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

17 posted on 03/30/2011 6:21:59 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Photobucket

The corruption of Obama is everywhere. I feel we have seen the last of our freedoms and rule of law taken from us.We must fight for those who died for our freedoms and the future of our children.

18 posted on 03/30/2011 6:23:36 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Mu understanding is that not only is their a legal requirement for part of the state legislature to publish laws passed within ten days, but her original injunction did not name this body. So conflicting laws AND misdirection on her part. I would love to see her reasoning on the unconstitutionality since that is the ONLY standing that the judiciary has in any case.


19 posted on 03/30/2011 6:24:21 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad

ugh their=there


20 posted on 03/30/2011 6:25:25 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson