Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax the Super Rich now or face a revolution
Market Watch ^ | March 29, 2011 | Paul B. Farrell

Posted on 03/29/2011 8:57:23 PM PDT by Christus_Rex

Yes, tax the Super Rich. Tax them now. Before the other 99% rise up, trigger a new American Revolution, a meltdown and the Great Depression 2.

We know the Super Rich don’t care. Not about you. Nor the American public. They can’t see. Can’t hear. Stay trapped in their Forbes-400 bubble. An echo chamber that isolates them. They see the public as faceless workers, customers, taxpayers. See GOP power on the ascent. Reaganomics is back. Unions on the run. Clueless masses are easily manipulated.

Even Obama is secretly working with the GOP, will never touch his Super Rich donors. Yes, the Super-Rich Delusion is that powerful, infecting all America.

Here’s how one savvy insider who knows described this Super-Rich Delusion: “The top 1% live privileged lives, aren’t worried about much. Families vacation at the best resorts. Their big concerns are finding the best Pilates teacher, best masseuse, best surgeons, best private schools. They aren’t concerned with the underlying deterioration of America or the world, except in the abstract, because they aren’t directly affected by it. That’s not to say they aren’t sympathetic, aware, or don’t talk about the issues you bring up. They are largely concerned with protecting and enhancing their socio-economic positions, ensuring their families live well. And nothing you write about will change things.”

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 1percent; 2018election; 2020election; business; communism; election2018; election2020; fauxiantrolls; incometaxes; irs; molassesmiasma; obama; onepercent; paulbfarrell; penguinhumor; superrich; taxcutsandjobsact; taxreform; taxtherich; tcja; uniparty; zot; zotlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,261-1,265 next last
To: ColdOne; Monkey Face

Afternoon. I took the byos on a walk to the Baptist church cemetery. Pretty interesting, a few veterans, one or two interesting names. The church has only been there since the 1970s, so it wasn’t real historic; on the other hand, it was easy to read the markers!


641 posted on 04/07/2011 10:04:03 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Buy me a Land Shark and take me to Anguilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; Tax-chick; fanfan; Monkey Face; Harmless Teddy Bear
funny pictures - Gramma always said....   "bad things'd happin' if ya didn't empty  tha lint trap regularly"
642 posted on 04/07/2011 10:42:24 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
The magic isn’t outside of us. It’s IN us, and always has been.

Oh, but surely our interaction with the magic must consist in both inward and outward components.

Consider that the magic may be "in" us in the same way that the a radio signal is "in" the radio. The radio transduces the signal into the music that we hear, but the signal, itself, is from beyond the radio. In like manner, the magic is from beyond us, but we are receivers, and transducers; we both receive the magic for ourselves, for our personal pleasure; and we convert the magic into forms perceptible to others for the mutual pleasure of all.

The magic exists beyond us, and would exist even if we did not. We are blessed to perceive it, to share it with one another, to participate in it through imitation by our own crude methods, and to take pleasure in so doing, but the magic itself, while it stirs great inspiration within us, comes from without. And while we draw great pleasure from our interactions with it, the magic ultimately exists, and is created, for the pleasure of The One Who IS its Source.

So, we use the tools of science to share the magic of gravity, and radiation with a broader mass of humanity. We use art to share the magic of that which we have seen only in our own mind's eye, but in all cases what products we manifest are inferior to that which we have received.

The scientist, in sharing the magic of gravity remains aware that what he is explaining is but a mote of "known" in a vast cosmic realm of as-yet unknown things. He speaks at length about the magical effects of gravity all the while perceiving inwardly the magic of the unexplained cause.

The magical work of the artists hands never reaches the perfection magic sees in his mind. As a well-composed photograph of the Grand Canyon is less than a firsthand view from the same vantage point, so always the magical inner vision given to the artist surpasses the magic by which he makes it manifest to others. As Beethoven's symphonies were all the more beautiful and stirring as he, himself heard them in his own head. By his art, he blessed us all with great and stirring reproductions, but they are lesser lights than the flame that enlivened and moved his own heart to transcribe them for the rest of us.

In all of these things our grasp of the magic we know, compels us — if we be sensible men — to pursue understanding of more. We stand in awe that He has deigned to share His magic with us to what extent we now perceive it, and has given us to know that the magic we have known is but the smallest splinter of all the magic that He commands. Out of this sense of awe He entices us daily to inquire of Him that we may know more of His magic.

Having by that, and many other, means drawn us toward Him, He gives to us His Invitation, to which our "Yes" is His heart's most dearly held desire: that we would engage the pursuit of the Deepest Magic of all; namely to perfectly know not only the magic, but The Magician.

643 posted on 04/07/2011 12:18:20 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Nietzsche: "God is dead." God: "Nietzsche is dead." Cthulu: "Dead is god." God: "LOL! Riiiight.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

How does your interaction with an author’s work change when you read from the Kindle, versus reading from a hardcopy; or does it change at all?


644 posted on 04/07/2011 12:22:45 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Nietzsche: "God is dead." God: "Nietzsche is dead." Cthulu: "Dead is god." God: "LOL! Riiiight.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

For me, a real nuisance would be not being able to look back up the page more than a few lines, at the facing page, or back a few pages to wherever the author mentioned why this character had a dead cat on his head and an onion sandwich. Of course, you can back up, but turning pages back ... “Oh, it was on the first page of the chapter!” ... is much more efficient than scrolling up text.


645 posted on 04/07/2011 12:30:54 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Buy me a Land Shark and take me to Anguilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

haven’t thought about summer yet, except for all the work to restore the gardens, pull out English Ivy, etc.


646 posted on 04/07/2011 2:29:34 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
How does your interaction with an author’s work change when you read from the Kindle, versus reading from a hardcopy; or does it change at all?

So far, not at all. It's nice not messing with a bookmark to keep my place, but that's offset by not being able to readily tell the length of an item in a collection. The ability to change font size is a real bonus for poor light situations (+ I might be needing new reading glasses). It's also nice to have it all fairly compact.

But when they sell ebooks at full price, I'm still buying paper.

And jumping around during a Bible study -- though I'm still a little clumsy with the Kindle, paper still looks better.

647 posted on 04/07/2011 2:34:02 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I wonder if we could tax the “super rich” to pay someone to weed our gardens?


648 posted on 04/07/2011 2:35:11 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (I am still looking for that box I am supposed to think out of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
I am glad you liked Percy Jackson. I was disappointed in the movie and hope that in a few years there will be a remake that actually does the series justice.
649 posted on 04/07/2011 3:29:54 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (When all you have is bolt cutters & vodka everything looks like the lock on Wolf Blitzer's boathouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Gasp.
I never should have shown you the Canadian Tire commercial.
Sorry DP.


650 posted on 04/07/2011 4:21:19 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Did you grow a cat?


651 posted on 04/07/2011 4:55:06 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23; NicknamedBob

Hmmm.

As good an answer as any, I guess. :-)


652 posted on 04/07/2011 4:55:21 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: fanfan; HKMk23
"Hmmm. As good an answer as any, I guess."

Really good answers do one of two things:

They make you glad you asked the question, or
They make you regret you asked the question.

653 posted on 04/07/2011 5:45:23 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (I get my exercise. I take my vitamins. I tell pain it can come along, but it'll have to ride in back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
I wonder if we could tax the “super rich” to pay someone to weed our gardens?

How about if they garden our weeds?

654 posted on 04/07/2011 6:32:49 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Heads Up!


655 posted on 04/07/2011 6:47:50 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Our garage is still a disaster, but Tom did the lawns today, at least.


656 posted on 04/07/2011 6:49:40 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Buy me a Land Shark and take me to Anguilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

What I’ve read of the Percy Jackson (and related) books has been clever and well-plotted. Tom got some good marks for the piece he read from “The Lost Hero” in a speech competition earlier this year.

Tom has just started reading the Steven Brust “Dragaera” novels, of which there are a dozen or more. He’ll end up a font of snarky dialogue, just like Anoreth.


657 posted on 04/07/2011 6:51:30 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Buy me a Land Shark and take me to Anguilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; Harmless Teddy Bear; sionnsar; Dead Corpse
"He’ll end up a font of snarky dialogue, just like Anoreth."

Ah, yes. There but for the forbearance of God, do I not go.

658 posted on 04/07/2011 7:11:46 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (I get my exercise. I take my vitamins. I tell pain it can come along, but it'll have to ride in back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

On reflection, Angela perceived that her relationship with Tom had always been rocky, not quite a roller-coaster ride but more like when the toilet-paper roll gets a little squashed so it hangs crooked and every time you pull some off you can hear the rest going bumpity-bumpity in its holder until you go nuts and push it back into shape, a degree of annoyance that Angela had now almost attained.

—Rephah Berg, Oakland California (2002 Winner)

http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/lyttony.htm

Have you heard of the The Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest.


659 posted on 04/07/2011 7:20:42 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (I am still looking for that box I am supposed to think out of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

I heard on the radio today that if you wear a camouflage hat nobody can tell what your thinking.


660 posted on 04/07/2011 8:57:39 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (I am still looking for that box I am supposed to think out of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,261-1,265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson