Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmm...any libertarian "conservatives" care to comment?
1 posted on 03/28/2011 5:40:41 PM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: LonelyCon

Ummmm, good luck with that.


2 posted on 03/28/2011 5:42:30 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

There’s a church in Kansas looking for him


3 posted on 03/28/2011 5:44:48 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Stupid and wrong direction.

What should be illegal is any profitable situation resulting from sex outside of marriage.

Welfare, free schooling for illegitimate children, child support, etc.

People should be free to sin. And everyone else should be free from having to pay for their consequences.

4 posted on 03/28/2011 5:44:49 PM PDT by Dr. Sheldon Cooper (If Mohammed were alive today, he wouldnÂ’t be allowed to live within 1000 yards of a school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

the guy is a complete and utter moron. What bussiness do he have if I sleep with an attractive lady who I’m not married to (or not so attractive, or a beer goggle hangover lady) is he going to install cameras in my bedroom?


5 posted on 03/28/2011 5:45:24 PM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Hmm...any libertarian "conservatives" care to comment?

Sure! Legislating morality and punishing those who commit infractions sound a lot like TROP!

6 posted on 03/28/2011 5:46:09 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with him, the Supreme Court has pretty much ruled that any such laws are unconstitutional when they struck down all the state laws on Sodomy on privacy grounds.
7 posted on 03/28/2011 5:46:45 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
"testified Wednesday that he would like to see Alaskans prosecuted for having sex outside of marriage"

I'll comment.

He's not fit for the office he's been nominated for.

And based on this nomination I question whether the Governor is fit for his.

8 posted on 03/28/2011 5:47:12 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Hmm...any libertarian "conservatives" care to comment?

The bible-thumpers already beat us to it.

Let's just throw everyone in jail if they so much as fart in church.

9 posted on 03/28/2011 5:49:57 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Luke ScottWalker - The Force Is With You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Hmm...any libertarian "conservatives" care to comment?

You bet! It's morons like this who push independents toward the left and end up helping to elect people like Obama. Jesus Christ did not need Rome to enforce his beliefs.

10 posted on 03/28/2011 5:50:31 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
Don Haase of Valdez Nanny State
11 posted on 03/28/2011 5:50:39 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

Good heavens. Like there are not enough issues to worry about. I know this is silly beyond the constitutionality of it. There is an entire industry of Lawyers and Private Investigators who would fight tooth and nail to stop this. They gotta eat too.


12 posted on 03/28/2011 5:53:33 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I guess the Framers were Nanny Statists too? Since they passed laws banning Fornication, Blasphemy and Adultery?


13 posted on 03/28/2011 5:55:11 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

He’s right. Sex outside of marriage has been illegal throughout most of man’s civilized history. There’s a good reason for that. That reason hasn’t changed.

It would be helpful to make it illegal against.


15 posted on 03/28/2011 5:57:01 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

Sex without the benefit of marriage was unlawful in many states as was bastardy until fairly recently. Those laws were deemed unenforceable due to widespread violation so they were removed from the codes. Legislators hate to see their states listed in those Almanacs of stupid odd laws columns. “Hey did you know it is illegal to leave a horse saddled during church on Sunday even though you can not buy beer any day of the week in Hereford Texas?”


16 posted on 03/28/2011 5:57:23 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

MI am no Libertarian, but I am a Constitutional Conservative I think more than half the country would be incarcerated in the event it was illegal. Of course it is against God’s law, a sin, which carries a heavy sentence already.


17 posted on 03/28/2011 5:57:32 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

LOL...Heck...I always thought sex STOPPED after marraige! World’s best birth control method = Wedding cake.

Lawmakers ...listen up. Leave us alone! We don’t need your help running our lives.


19 posted on 03/28/2011 5:58:35 PM PDT by nagdt ("None of my EX's live in Texas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
...his official resume failed to disclose his leadership role in Eagle Forum Alaska, which advocates for social conservative issues. He most recently was president of the organization, but resigned when he learned of his nomination, he said.

So not only is he a nanny statist, he is also a liar by omission.

22 posted on 03/28/2011 5:58:55 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

A judicial candidate can say he wishes pink elephants were banned, but as long as they are not he is duty bound to follow the law as it reads. That question looks like it was wholly evaded in this report.


25 posted on 03/28/2011 6:00:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

Even if he believed this why would he tell them that?

Must be more to this story

26 posted on 03/28/2011 6:01:18 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

Reputedly, there was an annual cluster of marriages and newborn arrivals among the Puritans about nine months after each New England winter. If they couldn’t keep it buttoned (zippers had not yet been invented) what hope is there for Alaskans? Parnell should withdraw this nomination on account of this idiot nominee’s gross misunderstanding of human nature and the limits of legitimate (pun intended) government authority.


30 posted on 03/28/2011 6:06:18 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson