Skip to comments.
Boy Genius ... Mark Steyn
Steyn Online ^
| 15 March 2011
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 03/16/2011 2:31:24 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Should western governments describe honor killings or female genital mutilation as barbaric? The son of the late Canadian colossus Pierre Trudeau thinks such terms have unfortunate pejorative overtones:
Liberal MP Justin Trudeau said the government should not call honour killings barbaric in a study guide for would-be Canadian citizens
Theres nothing that the word barbaric achieves that the words absolutely unacceptable would not have achieved, Trudeau, the Liberal immigration critic, said.
We accept that these acts are absolutely unacceptable. Thats not the debate. In casual conversation, Id even use the word barbaric to describe female circumcision, for example, but in an official Government of Canada publication, there needs to be a little bit of an attempt at responsible neutrality.
I suppose one should be relieved that he absolutely accepts that its absolutely unacceptable. The trouble is, as your average honor killer or clitoridectomist around the planet well understands, absolutely unacceptable is Liberal Weeniepants-speak for we entirely accept it. Last month:
Libya Must Stop Unacceptable Bloodshed Now: Hillary Clinton
This month:
Obama Warns Violence By Libya Government Unacceptable
Alas, all this absolutely unacceptable unacceptableness is spreading. Secretary Clinton on Bahrain:
We do not want to see any violence. We deplore it. We think it is absolutely unacceptable.
When a western politician says somethings unacceptable, the rest of the planet understands it means carry on until it drops off the front page, and I no longer have to talk about it. Justin Trudeaus observation is characteristically moronic whoops, I mean absolutely unacceptable.
[UPDATE: When you're in a clitoridectomy clinic, stop digging: M Trudeau has now clarified that, by "absolutely unacceptable", he means "totally unacceptable".]
TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: barbaric; canada; femalemutilation; genitalmutilation; honorkillings; justintrudeau; liberals; liberalspeak; marksteyn; steyn; trudeau; unacceptable; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
03/16/2011 2:31:29 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: Rummyfan
To: JLS
3
posted on
03/16/2011 2:40:57 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Rummyfan
This is why people cuss...to make their point. How about, “If you do it again, I’m going to come to your house and burn it down with your wife and kids inside?”
To: Rummyfan
Oh those silly morally relativistic Lefties—now they are defining barbarity down.
Can't wait til they start on sadistic--perhaps renaming it "uncalled for buzz killing."
5
posted on
03/16/2011 2:50:13 AM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("Only God has more power than the Second Amendment to save America.")
To: Rummyfan
What does Mr.Pearl say about all this???????
6
posted on
03/16/2011 3:29:11 AM PDT
by
Waco
(From Seward to Sara)
To: Rummyfan
Another useful idiot for the muslims in their quest to destroy freedom and liberty
To: Rummyfan
Justin Trudeau: Heredity or environment?
8
posted on
03/16/2011 3:48:19 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(I disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it -Voltaire)
To: Rummyfan
No, I’m not a neutered weenie with no b@lls whatsoever.
I’m an insufficiently maled non-female.
To: Rummyfan
Theres nothing that the word barbaric achieves that the words absolutely unacceptable would not have achieved, Trudeau, the Liberal immigration critic, said.
No, Trudeau, you moron, "absolutely unacceptable" doesn't go far enough because it doesn't describe why: because these actions lie completely outside the confines of civilized behavior; that is, they are typical of the behavior of barbarians, people whose ethics and ways of life are inimical to our Western civilization. No matter how anthropologists may map them onto civilized society as "functional equivalents," they aren't equivalent.
10
posted on
03/16/2011 3:59:20 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Rummyfan
Another worthless scumbag leftist. I bet the underpants on the head at Gitmo was “barbic” though.
Make a mass murderer mildly uncomfortable and the leftist vermin will scream moral indignation to the sky. Mutilate or slaughter an innocent Arab girl and the leftist vermin will find it mildly distasteful.
11
posted on
03/16/2011 4:04:39 AM PDT
by
Soothesayer
(smallpox is not a person)
To: Rummyfan
Another worthless scumbag leftist. I bet the underpants on the head at Gitmo was “barbaric” though.
Make a mass murderer mildly uncomfortable and the leftist vermin will scream moral indignation to the sky. Mutilate or slaughter an innocent Arab girl and the leftist vermin will find it mildly distasteful.
12
posted on
03/16/2011 4:04:52 AM PDT
by
Soothesayer
(smallpox is not a person)
To: Rummyfan
A facilitator of barbarism.
13
posted on
03/16/2011 4:11:52 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(*** Jesus ***)
To: Gene Eric
(***Jesus***)
My favorite tag line and my friend.
14
posted on
03/16/2011 4:17:43 AM PDT
by
RoadTest
(Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
To: Rummyfan
Absolutely unexceptionable.
15
posted on
03/16/2011 4:20:41 AM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: aruanan
“There’s nothing that the word “barbaric” achieves that the words “absolutely unacceptable” would not have achieved...”
Absolutely unacceptable is urinating in the sink. Barbaric is stoning some woman who went out of her house without a male escort. Barbaric is cutting someone’s head off while calling them an “Infidel”. Barbaric is hijacking planes and crashing them into a building killing innocent people. There is power in words and phrases. Barbaric is the “nicest” word to describe the radical Islamists. IMHO
To: Rummyfan
there needs to be a little bit of an attempt at responsible neutralityAnd there's the problem: "responsible" neutrality. In fact, young Trudeau is engaging in irresponsible neutrality or perhaps better put, pathological neutrality. Sometimes barbaric IS an appropriate modifier.
17
posted on
03/16/2011 5:50:04 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
To: aruanan
Re post 10, good post. But what do you do when your fellow countrymen insist on electing morons?
18
posted on
03/16/2011 5:50:41 AM PDT
by
Former Proud Canadian
(How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
To: TheOldLady; Rummyfan; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; ...
Mark Steyn ping.
Freepmail me, if you want on or off the Mark Steyn ping list.
Thanks for the ping slings and arrows.
19
posted on
03/16/2011 7:25:48 AM PDT
by
JLS
(Democrats: People who won't even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day.)
To: momtothree
Over use of the concept of barbaric is unacceptable.
20
posted on
03/16/2011 7:31:04 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson