Posted on 03/15/2011 8:13:35 AM PDT by SE Mom
Latest news from Japan:
From the BBC-
1456: Tepco says it may start pouring water from a helicopter over Fukushima Daiichi's reactor four in the next few days, to cool the spent-fuel pool.
1439: A 30km (18 mile) no-fly zone is in place around Fukushima, says the IAEA.
1436: The IAEA says Monday's blast at Fukushima may have affected the integrity of the containment vessel - there are fears of more serious radioactive leaks if happen.
1435: Following earlier reports, it appears there has been more than one strong aftershock in Japan - AP reports two tremors measuring over 6.0 within three minutes of each other.
Twitter-
-US Geological Survey counts 451 aftershocks since the initial earthquake struck Japan Friday. 238 of them registered magnitude 5.0 or more.
-Despite situations in Japan & Libya, spksmn Jay Carney says Pres Obama's 5-day trip to Brazil, Chile & El Salvador starting Fri night is on.
-FLASH: More U.S. military personnel in Japan testing positive for low-levels of radiation, relief missions to continue - Navy 18 minutes ago via web
Hey you:) Wondered where you were.
Bahrain, Libya, Saudi, Japan... and the president is jetting off to South America on pressing business after he picks his basketball favorites.
ROR
Blog on the Japanese reactors by actual nuclear physicists, not journalists.
I've noticed that the terminology involved with this nuclear tragedy is hampering most people's ability to understand what's occurring. Going past a misunderstood word causes a mental blank in a person's mind. Pass over enough of them, and the whole text becomes a blank.
Last night, I thought about compiling a short layman's dictionary of terms related to this accident, so that people could better understand what the authorities are saying. Perhaps I still will. Lord knows I've gotten my own share of misunderstoods while reading these articles.
Thanks for posting those pictures of typical BWR reactors, Ernest. Gives people some mass to go along with all of the concepts they’re attempting to learn.
Whew- now that’s someting we can use! Thank you.
Oh- some other good news:
NHK is reporting the flames at the No. 4 reactor are no longer visible
by Stephanie Ditta at 7:02
I guess I don't understand your equation. According to the world population clock, at 23:02 UTC on 3/15/2011 the world population was 6,905,991,023. According to your formula, if I subtract 1 from this total, I get 6,905,991,022. Are you saying that an error rate of 6,905,991,022 is "acceptable"? That seems pretty high to me, based on 30+ years experience in engineering, in private, public, and academic jobs. Better to use the historical nuclear industry average for LWR technology: zero fatalities, zero injuries among the general population.
Can't be repeated often enough, in my opinion. Mark Levin is making the same point, as I type this.
The excerpt you posted is excellent, and should be posted frequently. Any chance you can post the link to it?
I’m willing to make a bet he took his golf clubs with him. Donald Trump raked him over the coals for his behavior the day of and day after the quake playing golf and now vacation in SA.
I can now say with some certainy that you're at least right once in awhile. ;)
Good find!
The control rods don't hold the nuclear fuel pellets. The fuel rods do. The control rods are inserted to stop the nuclear chain reaction, which was done automatically by the system when the earthquake first hit.
So you think it is correct, an error rate of 6,905,991,022 is acceptable? That’s what I get if I follow your equation. Hey, you’re the one who proposed it. I say that is a little on the high side. Better to go with the historical nuclear average of zero fatalities, zero injuries.
Updated at 5:00 PM EDT March 15, 2011
Fact Sheet: Used Nuclear Fuel Storage at Fukushima Daiichi
No prob. Those guys describe, right down to minute detail, what is going on with the Japanese reactors and basically call BS on the American media.
Thanks. One of the bloggers, Steve Skutnik, did our undergrad work at ISU together. He got a physics degree and I got a history degree.
At some point you are faced with the question, how much is enough? The best we can do as engineers is look at historical risks and try to find what people seem to find "acceptable" in ordinary life, and use that as a baseline for designing systems that can meet some criteria for minimum risk acceptance. Its done that way with everything, automotive, aviation, chemical, medical, civil engineering, whatever.
Also, I wouldn't pay any attention what anything the surgeon general for this administration is saying. FGS, she's probably another affirmative action appointee.
I did find this link, that seems at least sane regarding KI pills: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014504194_nukehealth16m.html "I'm very concerned that there could be a significant problem in Japan," he said. "I'm less concerned about the health effects here in the United States."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.