Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team Obama tells Supreme Court to Stay Away From Health Care Challege
Fox News ^ | March 14, 2011 | Lee Ross

Posted on 03/14/2011 10:06:56 PM PDT by Citizen X_Area 51

The Obama administration told the Supreme Court on Monday night it should stay away from a high-profile challenge to the 2010 health care law until after a lower court has had a chance to review the case.

Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal wrote, "there is no basis for short-circuiting the normal course of appellate review." Katyal also says Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's case is problematic because he may lack sufficient standing to challenge the health care law.

(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhofascism; bhofscism; cuccinelli; democrats; fubo; kencuccinelli; liberalfascism; nealkatyal; obama; obamacare; obamatruthfile; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Citizen X_Area 51
" Team Obama tells Supreme Court to Stay Away From Health Care Challege "

Who are they to tell the Supreme court what to do ?
It seems they are openly threatening the Supreme Court.
21 posted on 03/14/2011 10:21:54 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

The lower court will not like it.


22 posted on 03/14/2011 10:21:59 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51
The Obama administration can put it where the sun don't shine as far as the SCOTUS is concerned.

Obama needs to understand that government that serves United States of America works nothing like the third world republics that he idolizes.

23 posted on 03/14/2011 10:22:03 PM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Remember how the Obamination and his fellow democrat party hacks mocked and booed the Supreme Court at the First State of the Union?

Obama truly despises the Rule of Law.


24 posted on 03/14/2011 10:22:28 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Now is the time for the Supreme Court to take up the issue of Obama’s eligibility.


25 posted on 03/14/2011 10:22:49 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

26 posted on 03/14/2011 10:22:52 PM PDT by Lazamataz (NPR is the ACORN of the media world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

You left out the part about “and we are well-armed”.

That’s a really big difference between us and a communist country. A difference that may come in handy....soon.


27 posted on 03/14/2011 10:23:00 PM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Since when does the President have the right to tell the Supreme Court what to do?

Imagine if had done this. We would never hear the end of it from the liberal media.


28 posted on 03/14/2011 10:23:54 PM PDT by Rainier_is_here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobP

Wow really cool.


29 posted on 03/14/2011 10:24:15 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Team Obama “acted stupidly.”


30 posted on 03/14/2011 10:24:24 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s case is problematic because he may lack sufficient standing to challenge the health care law?

Is there anything anybody can do or is it past time?


31 posted on 03/14/2011 10:25:00 PM PDT by satan (Plumbing new depths of worthlessness on a daily basis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rainier_is_here

He thinks he is the King.


32 posted on 03/14/2011 10:25:41 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

Now the thug in chief is trying to strong arm the SCOTUS?

That nerve of that arrogent son of a bitch. I hope Chief Justice Roberts, who really does not hide his disdain for Obama, tells him to pack sand and get the hell out of his and his court’s business.


33 posted on 03/14/2011 10:26:36 PM PDT by NWFLConservative (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

This isn’t the case we want in front of SCOTUS anyway - we want the one going to the 11th Circuit. The one that declares Obamacare unconstitutional.


34 posted on 03/14/2011 10:30:23 PM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Obama is just following up on the in chambers chit chat he had with the justices months ago. There is something going on that such a meeting could be had at that time and now with the audacity to tell the court to bug off. I wish I knew for certain what is going on. Millions of other people probably want to also know. In the meantime I’ll put on hold that the justices are honorable and don’t have some peculiar personal circumstances.


35 posted on 03/14/2011 10:31:32 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Obama is just following up on the in chambers chit chat he had with the justices months ago. There is something going on that such a meeting could be had at that time and now with the audacity to tell the court to bug off. I wish I knew for certain what is going on. Millions of other people probably want to also know. In the meantime I’ll put on hold that the justices are honorable and don’t have some peculiar personal circumstances.


36 posted on 03/14/2011 10:31:47 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

The Obama administration is desperately hoping that one of the conservative justices will have to retire from illness prior to hearing this case.


37 posted on 03/14/2011 10:31:52 PM PDT by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satan

Federal Judge Roger Vinson, who is right here in town, has already ruled Obamacare unconstitutional. He is the second Federal Judge to do so. Our new Governor Rick Scott, has thrown the weight of his office behind it too.


38 posted on 03/14/2011 10:32:47 PM PDT by NWFLConservative (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

This is a response to the Virginia Obamacare challenge. VA’s AG petitioned SCOTUS to expedite the procedure and bypass the Court of Appeals.

VA won at the District Court level; it’s being appealed at the Circuit Court of Appeals level. VA wants the case expedited. The Administration wants it to drag out as long as possible, including the year or so it would take to get thru the Court of Appeals. That’s what this brief is about, delay and stall.

There is a split between the circuits, always a strong factor in SCOTUS taking a case. The District Courts in VA and FL have declared the law either unconstitutional in its totality, or in part Three other circuits (DC/MI and ???) have declared it constitutional.

The SCOTUS will eventually take this case and/or the FL case, whether expedited or not. This is just in response to VA’s petition to expedite, it’s not a final appeal.


39 posted on 03/14/2011 10:33:04 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Citizen X_Area 51

This appears to be in response to Cuccinelli’s filing for a writ of certiorari. If that is the case, this is no big deal and Fox should be admonished for their headline.As the named party in the original case, the United States govt has every right to challenge the plaintiff’s motion.


40 posted on 03/14/2011 10:37:14 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (IACTA ALEA EST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson