Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Saw this and thought it deserved its own thread. I'm no expert on naval matters, but thought it strange they were decommissioning their only carrier before a new one comes into service.

I mean, every homeowner can tell you, you don't junk your old car before you buy a new one. That leaves you without transport.

1 posted on 03/13/2011 11:50:09 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: I still care

That’s what allies are for....


2 posted on 03/13/2011 11:50:55 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

25 years? I would think that is nothing in the way of a life cycle of a Navy ship.


3 posted on 03/13/2011 11:52:37 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

Sorta like the US putting all of its space shuttles in museums long before any replacement is built or even designed.


4 posted on 03/13/2011 11:55:14 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care
IIRC, it was a Swordfish torpedo biplane from the Ark Royal that disabled the rudders on the Bismarck.
5 posted on 03/13/2011 11:57:04 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care
This decision was forced on them by their economic circumstances. The way the cost of the F-35 keeps going up they may not get that new carrier at the end of the decade either.

The worst part of this for the Brits will be the long break in continuity for that highly specialized expertise it takes to operate a carrier. So many things will have to be relearned from scratch when and if they deploy another carrier.

7 posted on 03/13/2011 11:59:02 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

The new ones may never come into service.


8 posted on 03/13/2011 12:00:47 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

Sun sets on the British navy.


11 posted on 03/13/2011 12:08:39 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

Got to save that money to give homosexuals gender reassignment surgery.


16 posted on 03/13/2011 12:53:47 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care
I saw this and thought "Argh. They are decomissioning the Ark Royal, only to realize that it was the follow-on to the Ark Royal I was familiar with...

My squadron (VA-46) flew some sorties and conducted exercises with the Ark Royal back in the mid-seventies, here is a picture of one of our planes trapping on her deck...

But what I remember most about them was one day, as I was working in the fuel pits at Cecil Field, they had a few of their Buccaneer attack aircraft land to refuel (one of these)

As one of the planes was taxiing by, gray smoke began pouring out from inside the plane somewhere. The plane came to a jerking halt, and the crewmen scrambled out of the plane and ran about thirty yards away and turned to look back at the smoking plane while the rescue crews drove up...there was something oddly funny about that, though I am certain I would have done precisely the same thing in their shoes!

18 posted on 03/13/2011 1:03:09 PM PDT by rlmorel (How to relate to Liberals? Take a Conservative, remove all responsibility...logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

The Ark Royal, definitely a piece of history. May she rest in peace.


20 posted on 03/13/2011 1:08:15 PM PDT by Triton42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

I don’t think I’d sell my pickup before the replacement had been built. What’s different on a national scale?


21 posted on 03/13/2011 1:12:53 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (An election is not a (national) suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care
Maybe...maybe...just freeballin' it here, but maybe they wanted to disconnect any history or semblance of what used to be with the new Spirit of the UK...the HMS Mohammhead......
23 posted on 03/13/2011 1:18:29 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: magslinger

ping


24 posted on 03/13/2011 1:25:50 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

33 posted on 03/13/2011 2:20:01 PM PDT by magslinger (What Would Stephen Decatur Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: I still care

Recall the old saying that the tradition of the British Navy was “rum, sodomy and the lash” and who needs a ship?


34 posted on 03/13/2011 2:31:25 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson