Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann calls on Obama to apologize for ObamaCare 'fraud'
Minn. Star Tribune ^ | 3/4/11 | Kevin Diaz

Posted on 03/05/2011 11:52:46 AM PST by pissant

Minnesota Republican Michele Bachmann called Friday on President Obama to apologize for his landmark health care overhaul, which she called “legislative fraud of the highest order.”

A White House spokesman declined to comment.

Her congressional office issued two statements several hours apart, both lamenting that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – ObamaCare in GOP parlance – locks in some $105 billion in future spending to expand health care coverage, set up insurance exchanges, and pay for the nuts and bolts of the new health care law.

Such “advance appropriations,” Bachmann said, make it difficult for current and future Congresses to defund the bill, the GOP’s fallback position in light of the long odds against repeal.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bachmann; bhohealthcare; fraud; larrysinclairslover; michelebachmann; obama; obamacare; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Step on the boy marxist's throat, Michele.
1 posted on 03/05/2011 11:52:48 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

I like her. She got spunk. Unlike most Republicrats.


2 posted on 03/05/2011 11:53:45 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I like it. Force these frauds to defend their policies in public. Shame them for their lies.
Now, how do we get the media to cover this?


3 posted on 03/05/2011 12:01:00 PM PST by jakota (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Bachmann & Palin have more balls than the collective male Republican party. Seriously, add them up and see what you get.


4 posted on 03/05/2011 12:03:37 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Sorry Michelle...Odumbo can’t hear because he’s at the golf course.


5 posted on 03/05/2011 12:04:36 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I'm liking Michele Bachmann.

Liking her a lot.

6 posted on 03/05/2011 12:06:38 PM PST by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
advance appropriations

"Advance appropriations" are unconstitutional. No Congress can bind a future Congress to spend money they do not themselves vote to spend.

ML/NJ

7 posted on 03/05/2011 12:06:59 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
I understand your frustration with the GOP, but that's not fair to Republicans such as James Inholfe, who were standing firm even during the Clinton years.

That said, Palin, Bachmann, and West are why I'm optimistic about 2012.

8 posted on 03/05/2011 12:24:11 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Apologize? Hell, he’ll brag about it and high-five his fellow commies.


9 posted on 03/05/2011 12:43:39 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Bachmann is articulately sticking to principle.


10 posted on 03/05/2011 12:50:44 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Me too. I support Palin, but I would gladly throw my support behind Bachmann if she turns out to be the better, as in best chance of winning a general election, candidate.


11 posted on 03/05/2011 12:53:33 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
"Advance appropriations" are unconstitutional. No Congress can bind a future Congress to spend money they do not themselves vote to spend.

Hey do you happen to know the exact language in the constitution that says that?

I am not challenging you -- just curious.

12 posted on 03/05/2011 1:00:48 PM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Obamacare has been found illegal by the courts and the administration is now in contempt of court.


13 posted on 03/05/2011 1:03:05 PM PST by RoadTest (Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

That is true. Republican men generally tend to be wusses but
there is hope.


14 posted on 03/05/2011 1:09:44 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Obamacare is sinking.


15 posted on 03/05/2011 1:15:12 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I HOPE Bachmann understands that no Congress can Bind a future Congress, no matter what.

If she understands this she is being disingenuous. If she does not, she is not smart enough to get my vote in a national election.

I DO wish there was a 3rd alternative.

16 posted on 03/05/2011 1:21:07 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
How would a Palin + Bachmann or v v ticket fly??
17 posted on 03/05/2011 1:27:36 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; All

Why ask him to apologize...impeach the fraud!!!


18 posted on 03/05/2011 1:34:39 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
It's just common sense. Otherwise any one Congress could effectively amend the Constitution. This is why every Congress has to vote on appropriations. Any Congress that wanted to could effectively end Social Security by refusing to appropriate money for it. (I'm pretty sure that this was how the war in Viet Nam was ended.)

ML/NJ

19 posted on 03/05/2011 1:56:35 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That’s saying it.


20 posted on 03/05/2011 3:51:35 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson