Posted on 03/01/2011 11:11:45 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
State Rep. Mark Hatfield, R-Waycross, just handed me a copy of his new bill, HB 401, which would require President Barack Obama to provide certified proof of his birth to the Georgia secretary of state in order to appear on next years presidential primary and general election ballots.
The bill has the signatures of 94 members of the 180-member House, including that of one Democrat, Glenn Baker of Jonesboro.
The measure will get its first hearing on Wednesday. Read the bill here.
If youre a member of the Georgia Ports Authority or Georgia Chamber of Commerce, still attempting to persuade the White House to add a few zeros to that appropriation for the dredging of the Port of Savannah, this is your cue to cut loose an animal howl of frustration.
At minimum, the bill will make for some interesting chatter when the national press comes down to hear Newt Gingrichs announcement that hes exploring a GOP run for president.
Hatfield attempted similar legislation last year. From my AJC colleague April Hunt:
I think the issue with our sitting president has been left unresolved for a significant length of time that people have concerns, Hatfield said. But this is not just about our current president. Its about enforcing the constitutional provisions for anyone who seeks the office of presidency.
Hatfields bill would require certified copies of the candidates first original long-form birth certificate. Documentation as provided by Hawaii, which has insisted time and time again that Obama was born there, would not suffice, Hatfield said.....
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ajc.com ...
That’s the thing. He’s not gonna win Georgia anyway.
OH, FL, PA, WI, NV I’d like those states to toss him off the ballot.
This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports.
It doenst mean squat requesting judicial notice of an item not subject to judicial notice is just plain BS.
If it meant anything plaintiffs could request the judge take judicial notice of the public news reports stating Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia.
The original jurisdiction judge was upheld on appeal to the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the Supreme Court of the United States refused to review the Circuit Court’s ruling on first attempt. Second attempt happens tomorrow in conference at the Supreme Court. We should know by early next week.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28745277/HOLLISTER-v-SOETORO-PER-CURIAM-JUDGMENT-filed-Lower-Court-Affirmed-Transport-Room
True Impy.
But if he’s not on the ballot, even in state(s) he’ll lose, it’s damning.
And, how about the Dung Head Media and all the “After-Birthers” blowhole talking heads???
You couldn't be more right, yes you look totally silly and your posts are proof hereof!!!
So how was it possible to get/create the COLB posted different places???
Whenever a Family Court hears a case where there is a change in the vital record of birth, it may order a new document to be created to reflect change in data after it voids and seals the original document.
In Hawaii, when the Court orders a new vital record to be created, the registrar creates it and “files” the document. Whenever a application is made by a mother, delivery doctor and hospital administrator through attestation that a birth has occurred, the registrar “accepts” it and creates an original long form BC.
Obama’s original long form BC was “accepted” by the registrar after attestation by mother, hospital administrator, and delivery doctor and then sealed by Soetoro adoption.
Soetoro COLB created and “filed” by registrar after adoption finalized.
Soetoro COLB sealed and voided after Obama Sr returned to Hawaii to contest the adoption in 1971. The Obama COLB was “filed” by registrar after a court to create it was issued.
FYI, butter!!!
042-68-4425
LOL
If I think someone is holding an office for which he is not qualified under the Constitution, where do I go to find out if I am right, or wrong?
Many citizen disagree with my reasoning. Many agree. Isn't that why we have courts? Why is this issue not being handled by them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.