Posted on 03/01/2011 11:11:45 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
State Rep. Mark Hatfield, R-Waycross, just handed me a copy of his new bill, HB 401, which would require President Barack Obama to provide certified proof of his birth to the Georgia secretary of state in order to appear on next year’s presidential primary and general election ballots.
The bill has the signatures of 94 members of the 180-member House, including that of one Democrat, Glenn Baker of Jonesboro.
The measure will get its first hearing on Wednesday. Read the bill here.
If you’re a member of the Georgia Ports Authority or Georgia Chamber of Commerce, still attempting to persuade the White House to add a few zeros to that appropriation for the dredging of the Port of Savannah, this is your cue to cut loose an animal howl of frustration.
At minimum, the bill will make for some interesting chatter when the national press comes down to hear Newt Gingrich’s announcement that he’s exploring a GOP run for president.
Hatfield attempted similar legislation last year. From my AJC colleague April Hunt:
“I think the issue with our sitting president has been left unresolved for a significant length of time that people have concerns,” Hatfield said. “But this is not just about our current president. It’s about enforcing the constitutional provisions for anyone who seeks the office of presidency.”
Hatfield’s bill would require certified copies of “the candidate’s first original long-form birth certificate.” Documentation as provided by Hawaii, which has insisted time and time again that Obama was born there, “would not suffice,” Hatfield said.....
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ajc.com ...
As I recall, this particular bill has a NBC challenge clause, if a citizen objects to a presidential ballot candidate.
...........................
2 week window to do so.
Here is the question that isn’t for massaging, just an answer will do.
When elegibility laws are ENACTED, would 0b0z0 ORDER his appointees to release his papers? YES OR NO? If no, what’s the problem?
Btw, does anyone else notice that the SP’s story keeps changing in a slithery, slimy, as-needed, snake-in-the-grass way? An astute person with any insight at all would realize he was merely cementing his reputation for dishonesty and sleight of hand disingenuity.
Sadly, the world is full of psychologist types who are clueless and screwed up—far more so than those around them—who screw up most if not all those they come in contact with, and who leave the world a worse place than they found it.
And what social security number did OhOmo in chief file under...OBot?
Which was a redacted social security number on any government form that was released to the public.
It is incredulous to believe otherwise that this government is not covering up for Obama.
Btw, does anyone else notice that the SP’s story keeps changing in a slithery, slimy, as-needed, snake-in-the-grass way? An astute person with any insight at all would realize he was merely cementing his reputation for dishonesty and sleight of hand disingenuity.
Sadly, the world is full of psychologist types who are clueless and screwed up—far more so than those around them—who screw up most if not all those they come in contact with, and who leave the world a worse place than they found it.
You’re kidding, right? I have read about how returns filed under the wrong SSN cause all kinds of problems.
You are truly a piece of work.
You are an idiot. VIP credit files are protected and unauthorized access is reported to the Secret Service.
Please stick to topics you understand.
You obfuscate twit. As usual, you didn't prove or support anything you said.
Obama doesn't need to hide his social security if he really had a genuine one, but he doesn't.
If Obama did have a legit SSN, he could spend some of that $800 million in campaign finances he got. A measly amount $10 dollars for protection:
"Proactive identity theft protection LifeLock for just $10/ mo.- Relentlessly protecting your identity"
Obama and your "arguments" are pretty sad.
ok, I might have to forgive Georgia for the only speeding ticket I ever got....maybe.
You obfuscate twit. As usual, you didn’t prove or support anything you said.
Obama doesn’t need to hide his social security if he really had a genuine one, but he doesn’t.
If Obama did have a legit SSN, he could spend some of that $800 million in campaign finances he got. A measly amount $10 dollars for protection:
“Proactive identity theft protection LifeLock for just $10/ mo.- Relentlessly protecting your identity”
www.lifelock.com
Then I’m emailing Congressman Darrell Issa and letting him know that the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform needs to convene immediate hearings on Obama committing fraud against the Social Security System.
Don’t you worry RedSteel, we WILL get to the bottom of this.
Psst...wouldn’t LifeLock protect Obama’s Social Security number even more closely???????????????????????????????????
I’m betting that the Secret Service does an even BETTER job than LifeLock in protecting presidents from identity theft.
Wow, impressive keyboarding skills!
You are an idiot. VIP credit files are protected and unauthorized access is reported to the Secret Service.
Please stick to topics you understand.
I take no issue with the “idiot” remark, we’re all “idiots” on some issues outside our main areas of expertise.
Wow, impressive keyboarding skills!
I’m sorry, so sorry, that I was such a fool.
I didn’t know zots could be so cruel.
You tell me, mistakes, are part of being young.
But that won’t right the wrong that’s been done.
I’m sorry, so sorry; please accept my apology
But trolls are blind; and I was too blind to see.
Yeah twit, Obama could double down on protection to protect his numerous SSNs using SS protection. No doubt he could do it at a whim.
Which brings us back to your stupid post # 92:
But guess what? Barack Hussein Obama II and Michelle Obama have filed federal income tax returns using Social Security numbers for 2010 and for 2011 as well! They also filed federal income tax returns and federal financial disclosure forms containing Social Security numbers for the years that Barack Hussein Obama was a United States Senator: 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
No one has been able to see what social security number(s) Obama has been using on his tax returns, which your tried to imply that he did. Obama didn't disclose anything of the kind to the public.
You’re kidding, right? I have read about how returns filed under the wrong SSN cause all kinds of problems.
You are truly a piece of work.
Now some returns filed with the wrong Social Security number cause problems that are innocent mistakes and some returns filed with the wrong Social Security number cause problems that are fraudulently criminal and could be the grounds for an impeachable offense if fully investigated by a congressional committee or a grand jury.
Yeah twit, Obama could double down on protection to protect his numerous SSNs using SS protection. No doubt he could do it at a whim.
Which brings us back to your stupid post # 92: But guess what? Barack Hussein Obama II and Michelle Obama have filed federal income tax returns using Social Security numbers for 2010 and for 2011 as well! They also filed federal income tax returns and federal financial disclosure forms containing Social Security numbers for the years that Barack Hussein Obama was a United States Senator: 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
No one has been able to see what social security number(s) Obama has been using on his tax returns, which your tried to imply that he did. Obama didn’t disclose anything of the kind to the public.
YOU said that he didn’t have a number at all. How then can he file tax returns year after year with no Social Security number?
Don’t you agree that the Obama Social Security number issue would be an excellent topic of investigation for the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform?
******
I believe that Obama is a liar and a fraud.
Still, I believe it is going to be very difficult for even one state to pass such a long form birth certificate bill before the 2011 presidential elections. Too much controversy surrounding such a bill will cause state legislators to back off.
However, if we could just get one state---that first state--- to have the courage to take that first step for the good of the American people, it would be a tremendous historical event.
Yes, if we could just get one state to take that first giant historical step---just one state---I see another state quickly following that state's example, and then another state and then another state, until there will be a roaring public outcry for all states to require ALL presidential candidates---especially those born in a hospital---to attach a copy of their long form United States birth certificate to their application forms.
NOTE: As for those presidential candidates born in a log cabin or in a taxicab or in the woods somewhere, they should be required to attach an OFFICIAL document from their birth states---one with the state's SEAL--- that they indeed were born in that state on a certain date.
Yes, all we need is that first state. And what state will that be? Let us hope that it is Georgia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.