Posted on 02/25/2011 5:46:58 AM PST by SJackson
Washington finally broke its silence Wednesday over the crisis in Libya when President Barack Obama issued a statement before television cameras in the Grand Foyer of the White House. Until now, the Obama administration had been making only bland declarations concerning the Libyan turmoil in order not to endanger American diplomats and citizens who had yet to be evacuated to safety. Before Wednesday’s statement, Obama had only given out a written declaration regarding Libya last Friday.
But while the cause for the administration’s diplomatic reticence was resolved by a sea evacuation, Obama’s statement nevertheless contained only empty words. Instead of threats or a hard-hitting warning to Gaddafi from the leader of the world’s only superpower concerning the raging violence, the American public was treated to Obama’s well-known multi-polar approach for solving world problems, even when they involve American interests. With Wednesday’s statement, Obama once again demonstrated his continued intent to keep American power off the world stage.
“The entire world is watching, and we will coordinate our assistance and accountability measures with the international community,” Obama declared. “To that end, Secretary Clinton and I have asked Bill Burns, our Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, to make several stops in Europe and the region to intensify our consultations with allies and partners about the situation in Libya.”
Hillary Clinton will also travel to Geneva next Monday for more talks with other foreign ministers, all of which ought to scare Gadaffi into reining in his bands of killers and mercenaries.
Hundreds of these soldiers-for-hire, principally from Sudan, Chad and Niger, were reported to be heading to the Tripoli area, Gaddafi’s stronghold. According to an analysis by Stratfor Global Intelligence, the oil wealth in that area and the oil around Benghazi, the center of the anti-Gaddafi revolt, could see the current fighting develop into a protracted civil war between the two geographic regions.
Such a prospect would constitute a heavy setback for American and Western interests. With oil already over $100 a barrel for the first time since 2008 and expected to reach $120 within weeks if Libya’s oil ports are not reopened soon, the United States and other Western countries are facing severe economic consequences. One report sums up this dismal financial forecast by warning high oil prices would end America’s and the world’s economic recovery, which is just getting underway. Like with Iran’s nuclear weapons program, which, Obama seems to believe, is caused by the building of Israeli settlements, reality is once more being ignored.
But Obama’s decision to send his diplomats on a world tour first before taking any action regarding Libya, if any is taken at all, is in keeping, as one analyst states, with his leftist world view, one in which there are no superpowers. Or at least in America’s case, a superpower that refuses to act like one. Early in his administration, Obama signaled the days of America unilaterally using its power to defend its interests were over when he told the United Nations General Assembly in September, 2009 “power is no longer a zero-sum game.”
“No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation,” he said. “No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed.”
These words must have gladdened the hearts of tin pot dictators, like Gadaffi, around the world. Under an Obama presidency, they would not have to fear unilateral American military action for their misbehavior, like the air strike Ronald Regan ordered against Gadaffi in the 1980s. Due to his leftist egalitarianism, Obama has leveled American power down to that of Benin’s, restricting his country’s options in any world crisis. Hillary Clinton, reflecting this approach, said on Tuesday the United Nations Security Council was where action on Libya should be decided.
While Obama’s multi-polar approach was expected, what was most surprising, though, about his Wednesday White House statement is that he announced no course of action at all. With criticisms that he was not being tough enough on Libya, it is baffling that his administration appears not to have even started working on a plan to deal with the crisis. With the Libyan revolt already days old, his words indicated his government is only now developing a course of action, even though he said “my national security team has been working around the clock to monitor the situation there.”
“I’ve also asked my administration to prepare the full range of options that we have to respond to this crisis,” he said. “This includes actions we may take and those we will coordinate with our allies and partners, or those that we’ll carry out through multilateral institutions.”
Obama ended his statement by quoting a Libyan who said: “We just want to be able to live like human beings.”
But for that to happen, what is needed immediately is for the United States and NATO to use their airpower to stop the fighting. Bombing Gadaffi’s forces would cost less lives in the long run than a civil war fought “to the last drop of blood,” as the Libyan leader has promised. This also would allow the all-important oil exports to resume.
Discussions have taken place regarding establishing a no-fly zone over Libya and that is probably what Clinton will take up with her counterparts next Monday. But while this will stop Gaddafi’s mercenary pilots from bombing the opposition, it will not stop the killing on the ground. The only thing that would cause an old executioner like Gadaffi to stop killing is if an American aircraft carrier were to appear before the Libyan coast. But with Obama in the White House, don’t expect such a show of American power, even if it would allow people to start living like human beings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/02/24/obama-to-libyans-youre-on-your-own/
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Now, ruling America is a black man from our continent, an African from Arab descent, from Muslim descent, and this is something we never imagined – that from Reagan we would get to Barakeh Obama
In the next few days, one group or another is going to grab 100s of Western hostages, including lots of Americans who couldn't get out.
It will be a disaster for us, and it will wreck Obama’s presidency.
Is that counting what the Somali pirates did? Or not?
The gutless punk won;t even send in our Navy to evacuate our own citizens (even though China and Turkeyy did just that for their citizens yesterday).
It will be a disaster for us, and it will wreck Obama’s presidency.
..........................................................
Wreck Obama’s Presidency? Bwahahahahahahahaha
It’s already a wreck, has been from the start.
Come on-—give the guy a break—he sent in a couple of ferry boats that have to wait for calm sea’s before they can leave.
The warmongers/laptop bombers at Frontpage never met an endless and budget-busting quagmire they didn't like.
You & me both, Moomar. You & me both.
Besides, catamarans are supposed to be fun, right? Ain't that what matters? Moochelle must have ordered them.
I wish he'd say the same thing for Americans.
Leave us alone! We can take our of our own problems. Go shoot some hoops or stuff your skinny face with ice cream or something. Leave us the hell alone!
Amidst the gathering storm in Libya (or is it “Lybia?”) Obama took time out to announce that he wouldn’t defend the Defense of Marriage Act, which states that marriage is between two people—one man and one woman. In other words:
LESBIANS—YES! LIBYANS—NO!
________________________________________
LABIA-YES! LYBIA-NO!
“But for that to happen, what is needed immediately is for the United States and NATO to use their airpower to stop the fighting. Bombing Gadaffi’s forces would cost less lives in the long run than a civil war fought “to the last drop of blood,” as the Libyan leader has promised. This also would allow the all-important oil exports to resume.”
I’m sorry? This is one of the more arrogant, vacuous statements I’ve read in quite awhile. I don’t know, but will assume, that the writer used to work for the Clinton administration during the Bosnia era...
Colonel, USAFR
Is it possible they’re on their own because Libyan cash found its way into Obama’s campaign? Maybe Gaddafi can prove it. Maybe that’s why he said the other day that Obama was his friend. Just speculating.
The Mega Wimp makes nice with Michelle’s stylist./s
No more American ships in the Med. Iran having “war games with Turkey( first time as FReepers know since 1979), does a UN waltz on Israel while Egypt’s 2,000,000 scream” march to Jerusalem.” Obama has NO idea the storm that’s being created, or maybe he does. maybe this is all a Soros/Obama/ czar...freaky anti-Jew ushernig the 12th clifart plan. Obama me thinks is mentally ill, far worse than Daffy Khaddafi.
This clown would screw up two car funeral, LMAO.
“make several stops in Europe and the region to intensify our consultations with allies and partners about the situation in Libya.”
We have allies in N. Africa still? Who knew? We just lost Egypt, Tunisia was too small to matter (and French besides), Libya has been our enemy for decades (maybe centuries if you count the Barbary pirates), Algeria was never our ally and Morocco may be friendly, but calling it an ally is a stretch and they have their own problems with protests now. I guess Paris and Geneva are considered “the region”.
Of all our allies, the Italians will be hurt the most by the unrest in Libya. They get 25% of their energy supplies from Libya.
The ONLY support that the U.S. should give Libyan “rebels” (when the broad outline of their ultimate political aims is unknown) is:
(a) moral and international diplomatic support for their opposition to a ruthless domestic dictator;
(b) medical and food assistance to areas held be the “rebels”.
(c) if asked by the rebels, limited undercover State/CIA support in the areas of intelligence (what is the dictator doing) and governmental organization expert advice - how to set up and manage working quasi-governmental units [This would require an acknowledged non-commitment to continuation of this assistance, should we at any time NOT be in support of a direction the rebels were taking - in opposition tactics OR political direction]. The idea behind this form of assistance is to HELP, NOT to direct.
Anything more than that, such as direct military assistance or intervention and WE, the U.S., would OWN the interim result and become responsible for the rest of the transition. Given my very first statement above, that could be no more a winning prospect, in the end, than supporting the dictator (ANY LONGER) would be now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.