Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Rebuke Effort to Defund Health Care Law(WARNING: May cause blood shooting from eyes)
Fox News ^ | Feb 15, 2011 | Chad Pergram

Posted on 02/16/2011 5:29:43 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet

Edited on 02/16/2011 6:15:08 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and defenders of the health care reform law unearthed an unexpected and temporary ally Monday night: Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC).

Politics makes strange bedfellows. But few bunking arrangements are stranger than this.

To be clear, there aren't many in Congress who have more antipathy for the health care law than Foxx. In fact, at a meeting of the House Rules Committee Monday night, Foxx could barely hide her contempt for the health law.


(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: california; care; congress; foxx; health; healthcare; house; king; nancypelosi; northcarolina; obamacare; pelosi; republicans; steveking; virginiafoxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
So, the “Party of Stooooopid,” strikes again, NEVER learning from their decades wandering in the wilderness of being in the “Minority” while the Demo-Rats pretty much called the shots and did whatever they wanted to do when in power, and now that “we” have worked so hard to give them “One More Chance,” some of the REPUBLI-TARDS, now in the “Majority,” act no different then before; allow the Dummy-Crats to cow them into submission and all of a sudden, want to trot out the ol’ “Marquess (aka Marquis) of Queensberry Rules” and fall into the proverbial trap of NOT knowing how to act like WINNERS and actually show some stones in “Ruling” like same?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but does not each Legislative Session—as has been the norm forever--adopt their own “Rules” based upon who is in the Majority?

You would think someone has suggested they (like Dear Leader and the Dems have) ignore or usurp the Constitution as opposed to a simple granting of a “Waiver.”

SHEESH!

Moreover, like the State Run Media is NOT going to pillory, impugn, denigrate and attack the R’s no matter what they do?

I doubt that most of us who worked to change control of the House in our favor intended the Pubes to “Make nice-nice” and "go along and git’ along” as opposed to kicking some butt and not bothering to take names as they dismantled some/all of the Community Agitator’s abominations.

IF, as has the last Court Decision suggests, O’Bozzo’s “Death Care” is Unconstitutional, is there any reason to worry about a minor “Waiver” in the “Rules” for crying out loud, if the House can “Defund it?”

It’s enough to make make a person want to turn to the demon rum, so early in the day! lol

1 posted on 02/16/2011 5:29:47 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

My head is exploding this AM, too much insane news, and now this!


2 posted on 02/16/2011 5:33:16 AM PST by ohiogrammy (12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Grasping DEFEAT from the JAWS of VICTORY!!!

Apparently some RePUBICans failed to learn the Lesson of 2010. Hope the rest of the TEA PARTY has taken notice of this.


3 posted on 02/16/2011 5:33:50 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Egypt 2011 = Iran 1979)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Why dont they just pass a resolution saying that any law passed “outside the rules” is null and void. Rules are rules, right?


4 posted on 02/16/2011 5:35:25 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

For us, rules are rules.

For them “more of a guideline really”. Like the Pirates code.


5 posted on 02/16/2011 5:38:54 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

I think a lot of the problem is that many of these representatives have been popular all their lives. They were elected to student councils in high school, on the football team or cheerleading squad. They have sought, and received, attention from others since childhood. They have learned not to do anything that would reduce their social standing.

Now they are in Congress, having won the ultimate popularity contest, and they don’t want to lose the acclaim.

And now the media would be mean to them??? Oh, no! We must appear to be open-minded and flexible!

It is all about popularity, about being invited to the right parties, about having the right friends.

We need to look at candidates and ask if they have been one of the chosen ones all their lives... and not vote for them.


6 posted on 02/16/2011 5:40:03 AM PST by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohiogrammy

I called Sessions last night. Should we call Foxx? What the hell is going on.


7 posted on 02/16/2011 5:41:10 AM PST by GoCards (Why me? Why not me?o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Strip this woman of all committee assignments and stick her in the smallest, closet sized office you can find.


8 posted on 02/16/2011 5:48:27 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

the GOP came to box. The dims came to street fight


9 posted on 02/16/2011 5:50:06 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

So long as I think of the GOP as the other big gov, big debt, big tax party......I’m never disappointed.


10 posted on 02/16/2011 5:51:37 AM PST by Leisler (Our debts are someone's profit. Follow the money, the vig.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

The Gutless Old Party strikes again.

Who can claim surprise?


11 posted on 02/16/2011 5:56:18 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Tea Party rallies should be aimed at Republicans. Strike fear in them.

We can tell Democrats to respect the Constitution, but they don't care. It does no good. But if we can make it clear to the Republicans that they must support limited government or lose our support, they might actually listen.

12 posted on 02/16/2011 5:56:51 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (BO + MB = BOMB -- The One will make sure they get one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Plan on these clowns being responsible for losing in 2012.

Gutless, spineless wonders.


13 posted on 02/16/2011 5:58:24 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Amazing how little time it took this time around.

A pox on both their Houses.

14 posted on 02/16/2011 6:02:58 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III%. The last line in the sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

“Ms.” Foxx is surely no Jesse Helms. NC can no longer pick decent leaders. Jesse was the last shining light from the Tarheels. Republican primary voters in NC are not what they were in March 1976, when they rescued Reagan.


15 posted on 02/16/2011 6:11:12 AM PST by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Give her a ring and a piece of your mind. I will.

202-225-2071


16 posted on 02/16/2011 6:11:49 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks
They have learned not to do anything that would reduce their social standing. Now they are in Congress, having won the ultimate popularity contest, and they don’t want to lose the acclaim.

I think you have nailed it. We need to eliminate people like that from the Congress. We need CITIZEN legislators who want to go do their stint, then return to their lives.

17 posted on 02/16/2011 6:13:20 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Most TEA Party challengers get nowhere in Republicaqn primaries because primary voters think they are required to rubberstamp the incumbent. Even in DE, when the TEA party choice prevailed in the primary, she did not defeat an incumbent, at least technically. Primary voters are truly a confused lot.


18 posted on 02/16/2011 6:13:29 AM PST by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All; Conservative Vermont Vet

For those who voted GOP hoping they’d get something other than the same old BushIDoleBushIIMcain mush this time...

Suckers.

The GOP is not a conservative, free-market, limited-government party. It only plays one on TV.


19 posted on 02/16/2011 6:13:29 AM PST by gregd0180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
FWIW, here's a link to the clueless committee's contact numbers:

http://rules.house.gov/singlepages.aspx?NewsID=3&RSBD=4

20 posted on 02/16/2011 6:14:52 AM PST by Jane Long (2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson