Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2011 7:52:21 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Let’s hit the streets to put Watson in the White House


2 posted on 02/15/2011 7:57:43 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (The Rodney King Riots: Courtesy of ABC, CBS, NBC & CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
42
3 posted on 02/15/2011 7:57:43 PM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m not impressed! It takes a room full of supercooled supercomputers to do the same as one person. Not very cost effective if you ask me.


4 posted on 02/15/2011 7:59:52 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Computer ties human as they square off on 'Jeopardy!'

How well would Watson do in Peking? He'd have an army of his Levono children out there working on his behalf. True social networking.

6 posted on 02/15/2011 8:02:52 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Someone should ask Watson who the hell Obama really is.


7 posted on 02/15/2011 8:04:13 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

there were several easy questions that the humans knew and I could see them trying to push the button but Watson answered first. I suppose watson answers at the speed of light while humans have to push a button that is far slower and puts them at a disadvantage.


8 posted on 02/15/2011 8:06:18 PM PST by hecht (TAKE BACK OUR NATION AND OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Wait till the categorey is “Women” and the clue is something like “number of ways a guy can screw up”. That’s one of those divide by zero thingies that always blow computers to smithereens.


9 posted on 02/15/2011 8:06:31 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It's all fun and games until it takes over all the other systems, becomes self-aware, and launches our nukes...

Yes, the obligatory Skynet reference...

10 posted on 02/15/2011 8:06:41 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Watson kicked the humans’ butts today.

It even got in some mild humor.

I am thinking SkyNet...


12 posted on 02/15/2011 8:12:43 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-reader is a Judas Goat, leading the American sheeple to the slaugherhouse /Parmy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Knowing the answers to the questions is only half the battle. What is really important is pushing the button at the right time, which brings me to my question. Does Watson activate the button mechanically, like his human counterparts?


13 posted on 02/15/2011 8:13:06 PM PST by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Does it have the rudimentary capability of understanding the spoken question or is the question inputted separately?
15 posted on 02/15/2011 8:13:59 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ask Watson if Islam is a religion of peace.

That will fry his circuit board.


22 posted on 02/15/2011 8:43:23 PM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

"Hey Watson, your mother's a whore."

24 posted on 02/15/2011 8:49:57 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

How does a computer decide how much to wager in final jeopardy? I suppose it doesn’t matter if it has doubled the other players’ scores. But what if it wasn’t? How would a computer judge its knowledge of “U.S. Cities” if, presumably, if it knows everything it knows with equanimity? I mean, it can’t say to itself, “Well, I took that calculus course sophomore year, but I didn’t study very hard, so I better not swing for the fences.”


34 posted on 02/15/2011 9:44:33 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Time to crank up, “I Lost On Jeopardy” by Weird Al! :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvUZijEuNDQ


36 posted on 02/15/2011 9:49:50 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So what’s the deal - does Watson have an internet connection and basically googles the answer in an intelligent way or does he have these facts programmed into him somehow? If it’s all internal, then that’s pretty impressive, because he would have to have an incredibly broad database of raw factual info do draw on.


40 posted on 02/15/2011 9:58:55 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He may be smart but he will never get a date . . . when they can fit watson into a container he size of a coconut, I’ll be impressed


47 posted on 02/15/2011 11:15:13 PM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

In actuality the human contestants are squaring off against the team of coders who wrote the software. They are in no way competing against an intelligent machine of any sort.

A bright 12 year old could program the same powerful computer to play a mediocre game of checkers or a group of high-end coders can program it to play Jeopardy but the machine stays the same, it is the brilliance of the programmers that is on display.

Computers are tools, they are amplifiers that automate intelligence. They are the most important tools ever created by man.


48 posted on 02/15/2011 11:20:35 PM PST by Bobalu ( "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." ..Moshe Dayan:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think they’ve allowed Watson’s buzzer timing to be too fast - it’s clear from watching that the 2 guys knew a lot of the questions but couldn’t get in first. So is it fair to let the computer buzz in every time (mechanically) as fast as the fastest human would, or should they have adjusted the reaction time?
Assuming all 3 of them knew the question before Alex was done talking and tried to buzz in as soon as the buzzers unlock, yesterday did not look fair and Ken Jennings said as much on Fox this AM (but not in a whiny way).


52 posted on 02/16/2011 4:51:27 AM PST by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson