Washington Times Poll on gays at CPAC

The Washington Times ^

[HalleysFifth]

Poll: Should conservative groups boycott CPAC if gay rights groups are allowed to participate?

[HalleysFifth]

Only 139 votes cast at time of this post: Yes: 46% No: 51% Und: 3% Other 0%

[HalleysFifth]

Oops. On further examination of this poll, it seems you have to have a login account at WashingtonTimes.com to vote. Sorry.

[hosepipe]

ALL Polls are propaganda..

[Sister_T]

I voted No. These groups need to stop backing down, in the name of “principle”, and start exposing just how “conservative” homosexual so-called “rights” really are. Start showing people how much freedom of speech they will lose if groups like GOProud get what they want and show examples from places like Massachusetts and other places where people have been harassed for opposing homosexual so-called “rights”. Tell people the loss of their religious freedom if these groups get their way.

No, these groups shouldn’t boycott; they should be there in force and exposing these so-called “conservatives” and their anti-First Amendment agenda.

[NoLibZone]

Norquist,Khan and Paul will be there.

[JoeFromSidney]

I had no objection to the Pink Pistols being present at a recent Gun Rights Policy Conference. Despite their sinful behavior, they have rights too. But sponsorship is another matter. I think CPAC went too far there.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

I wonder how different the poll would be if its possible entries included:

Yes:, No:, Und:, Meh:, Huh?:, and Pass:.

[Secret Agent Man]

If they were smart they would. But that’s their choice. Personally I wouldn’t want to be there with that going on.

[fwdude]

Why in the world would someone voluntarily vote if they are “undecided?”

[DWar]

Accept help and votes from all. Maintain solidly conservative core positions. Allow no leadership positions to people who oppose any core belief. Allow no platform plank that waters down any core belief. Allow no speaker who holds other than core beliefs to address the convention. If they can live with being among us but not be a part of us so can we.

[A'elian' nation]

“Why in the world would someone voluntarily vote if they are “undecided?””

That is one smart question.

They could also have voted ‘Not Present’
being the mindless idolators they are.

[savagesusie]

It is the difference of accepting that people aren’t perfect and all are sinners and CPAC endorsing and glorifying the sin.

You cannot endorse the unnatural behavior or evil behavior (as welfare shows—you get more of it). Our massive conditioning through Skinner/Pavlovian techniques in the media and schools have been so massive in the last two decades that people are ready to believe all propaganda about the lifestyle—it is natural and genetic. Both are lies, which are proven.

Cultures which are pro-homosexual endorse pederasty. It is never separated—whether the SA homosexual Brownshirts, the ancient Greeks and Romans, Sumarai Japanese, and the present day Afghanis. Pederasty is rampant in those societies because boys have to be initiated into the lifestyle when forming their sexual identities. Their nature is perverted. (Lesbianism is nothing but male hatred, hatred of the female body, and immorality).

Endorsing homosexuality also makes freedom of religion impossible. The Bible becomes “Hate Speech”. We have no first Amendment rights. Force of Law in re-education camps (Universities and Military) forbid the freedom of thought and religion. That is the most basic of all freedoms and underlines personal property—the freedom to own one’s mind and body.

Having institutions and government teaching unnatural acts are good is unconstitutional and flies in the face of religious freedom. Our laws were based on Christian morality and that can’t change unless we change the fundamental meaning of our Founding documents and where are rights derive.

Christianity was aligned with Natural Law Theory by Aquinas...and our system of government is built on Natural Law Theory which presupposes a Supreme Being. It also says that human nature NEVER changes and that our rights come from God. You can not have moral absolutes and keep evolving what wife and husband means...it is right out of Communism where everything EVOLVES—even human nature.

Christianity and the Bible were the basis of our legal system since it is the ideology that formed Common Law. We will fundamentally change the foundation and paradigm of this nation if we adopt “homosexuality is “good” and a “right”. It cannot be. Laws are unjust that go against natural law...even Cicero said that. There is never a homosexual rooster—or any animals in nature. Yes, you can pervert animal behavior just like teaching, modeling and psychology can affect the thinking of humans.

You can condition boys to love sodomy....that is what they do in Afghanistan. Homosexuality is all about excluding half of the human race. It never units it and because of this it creates inequities and hatred for half of the human race. Look at the noses of the women in Afghanistan. They are useless cuz all they are used for is breeding. In homosexual cultures, women are reduced to breeders and the beautiful boys are put on pedestals and they become pleasure-seekers and narcissistic. Orgies and child-sacrafice become the norm. Human dignity can never exist in homosexual societies—because their very act demeans the body and is nihilistic and only a selfish lustful act. It is never the life-force and goodness created by the unity of the opposite sexes who cherish one another, that has the potential to give life.

[SkyPilot]

I voted, but I can’t see the results of the poll on that page.