LOL! Two RINOs. Kristol is a joke and Beck is a pal of Obama lover O’Reilly.
The Birchers were, for the most part, right.
Not much of a brawl. Kristol yells accusations from the Bushes and Beck proves him wrong.
“Glenn Beck is “marginalizing” himself with conspiracy talk about Egypt’s anti-Mubarak protests and evoking memories of the John Birch Society’s Communist-conspiracy talk of the 1960’s”
Almost word for word what Chrissie Matthews spouted I think yesterday.
All I know is the minute he said it I hit the channel button.
Beck is over target and taking flak. Exposing the NWO to the masses. Now Kristol is running to MSNBC. Too funny.
That could be a brawl on the right only if Kristol were actually on the right. These days, Kristol is aiming more to follow the path of Hillary Rodham Gergen.
Are they trying to slam and portray Beck as an antisemite because he had the audacity to hammer Soros? Or is it about Glenn Beck and his anti establishment and populist view that threatens establishment power and the NWO?
American patriots, populists, establishment wonks and elitists are all scrambling for power.
difference not that I need to point it out to most freepers.
Beck uses facts, their words, their videos, their manifesto’s everything to back his claims up.
The rest uses , well nothing but accusations.
Now all Beck is asking is that the corrupt biased media listen to him, and the do their own research.
If they find he’s wrong then prove it with their backups and if he is right then report that Beck is onto something.
Hell my youngest at aged 8 figured that out and binged what he was saying.
I would expect Kristol to deny what is going on in the world. The veil will soon be lifted.
Rummy backs Beck’s suspicions:
EIB Interview: Donald Rumsfeld
February 8, 2011
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020811/content/01125106.member.html
[huge snip]
RUSH: In context of all that, what do you make of what’s happening in Egypt? So many people are confused. I must confess I’m having a tough time finding somebody I believe is able to convince me what this is really all about.
RUMSFELD: Let me make a couple of comments in that regard. First, it seems to me that what’s important is private diplomacy, not public diplomacy. Public diplomacy tends to be aimed not so much at the people you’re trying to persuade, but to satisfy your own base and to make yourself look good. And one knows that the private diplomacy is what ultimately is going to be important. So it’s not surprising that those of us on the outside don’t have a perfect fix on what’s taking place. Second, I would say that there are without question — first of all, Egypt’s an enormously important country. It’s large, it’s historically important. From an educational standpoint it’s a big factor in the Arab world and what happens there makes a big difference to us. As you know well, we watched what happened in Iran where there was a popular revolution and the people that were the best organized and the most vicious took over the country. And they didn’t end up with freer political systems or freer economic systems. They ended up with the ayatollahs controlling that country.
RUSH: Well, that’s the thing. Are we looking at something similar here or is this really — I mean there are people telling us this is a democracy movement, we need to be fully, fully behind what’s going on here. If that means the ouster of Mubarak, then we must be for it immediately. We’re hearing that argument as well.
RUMSFELD: Well, you can have a perfectly legitimate democracy movement where there are a variety of people across the political spectrum who all agree that there needs to be change. The problem is the people who tend to be the best organized are the most radical and the most vicious. And so you can have a broad popular democracy movement and have it end being taken over by the most vicious people and the result is you don’t end up with free political systems or free economic systems, you end up with a handful of radicals controlling the country. That’s the risk.
RUSH: We’re speaking with former Defense Secretary Ronald Rumsfeld, former secretary of practically everything in his career in the US government. Were we surprised at what happened in Iran when we decided the Shah had to go? Was there intel that the ayatollahs might take over and form an Islamist government as they have?
RUMSFELD: There was certainly intel that suggested that the return of the ayatollah from, as I recall, Paris to Iran and that there were people who had extreme views. I think that the actual departure of the Shah came as a surprise. I don’t think our intel suggested that. There was clearly information that there was concern about the secret police, the SAVAK during that period, and the country had not moved toward freer political and freer economic systems.
RUSH: Well, people have the same fear that the process is repeating itself in Egypt.
RUMSFELD: That’s true. I mean it’s a perfectly legitimate concern. How it will come out, we don’t know. But if you think about our world and the relatively small number of countries where people are doing well and have opportunity, those are the countries with the freer political and the freer economic systems. The places where people are not doing well — my favorite picture as you probably know is that picture of the Korean peninsula taken from a satellite at night, and the same people north and south, the same resources north and south, and below the demilitarized zone you have this brilliant light with the 12th or 13th largest economy on the face of the earth and up north people are starving because there’s a dictatorship up north and a free system down south.
RUSH: We’re speaking with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
[snip]
It seems the elites (left and right) feel they have Beck on the ropes, and are going in for the kill.
They couldn’t be so wrong.
Bill Kristol has long been a worthless neocon joke.
Glenn Beck lost me when he attacked Birthers, who now are 58% strong, and still hasn’t addressed the issue in any meaningfull way.
In retrospect, how right or wrong WERE the Birchers, in the 60s?
Code Pink had to be rescued by the oil companies that they march and demonstrate against.
Kristol is establishment. I wouldn’t curse Beck that harshly. It’s probably been a year since I’ve listened to Beck, but he was a long way from RINO then.
Billyboy Kristol was a prepubescent schoolboy in the "early 1960's" and doesn't know what was going on back then any more than he knows about the French revolution. I hate when these pampered preppy juveniles talk as if they have some kind of gravitas. No big fan of Glen Beck here, either, but he gets the call over Kristol.
Purse fight
i agree with each about 60 percent of the time
Beck is more out to lunch how he skews history and acts immature
Kristol by a nose but let me supply the pistols
Kristol did support Palin when few. beltway folks would