So Durbin the Dick is now also a liberal fascist.My, my the list is getting quite long.
Of course Dicky thinks that Americans are sheeple. He makes a grave mistake.
What will he do when Americans in overwhelming numbers refuse to comply with this unconstitutional law, haul them all into court , where they will defend themselves based on the unconstitutionality of the Death Care “law?”
Right tricky Dicky, that’ll work.
Dumber than dirt.
Civil Disobedience Dick. Lick it Dick.You make me sick Dick.
You think you’re slick but you are just a liberal fascist Hick, dumber than brick, Dick. Your slick Dick trick , thick and sick, dumb brick flick, will never stick, bend over Dick, receive the kick, right on your wick.
ICK!
Not surprised that a judicial finding is considered no restraint to ‘Rats who routinely are unconstrained by the Constitution of the United States of America. Oh, and Turban is a Dick.
there is no such thing as a good registered Democrat.
What would you expect from the Democrats? Do they not believe that the Constitution is outdated and flawed? After all, it was created by dead white men.
To Democrats the "rule of law" only applies to those they wish to punish or persecute; certainly not themselves! Somebody has to be above the law.
Its easy for Durbin to say the law should still be enforced....he does not do the enforcing, hence, he is in no legal jeopardy.
Durbin’s words are the bark of a coward.
All the more reason why states and the people should reassert their 10th Amendment rights wihtout seeking permission from any branch of the federal government by telling the federal government it will not comply with Unconstitutional Obamacare because regulating health care is not an enumerated power granted to Congress and is therefore a power reserved to the states or the people.
Durbin is merely reflecting what the Obama admin plans to do.
You see, what American citizens don’t seem to comprehend is that this government does not intend to follow the law.
So, we have no recourse left that is a peaceful one.
very sad
I must be missing all the republicans out there demanding Obama follow the law.
A lawmaker who doesn’t believe in enforcing the law. They should all be tossed out.
Daring the Pubbies....
Having scoured my Constitution fruitlessly searching for the lawful power for the judiciary, or individual judges, to make laws, amend constitutions, or veto legislation, I would have to say that if Obama thinks his health care law is constitutional he should go ahead.
Meanwhile, everyone affected in the particular case which was adjudicated in Florida should go ahead and follow the judge’s absolutely correct ruling.
And every other officer of government throughout the United States should make a similar call as to the constitutionality of the law and act accordingly, in line with their own oaths.
Which includes the immediate impeachment of any or all of those who are trying to enact this clearly unconstitutional law.
I believe this to be what someone has referred to as a “teachable moment.”
I’m no lawyer, but isn’t contempt of court technically a crime of the “high crimes and misdemeanors” variety ? You know, crimes that would get a President impeached ?
To impose and enforce a law that has been declared illegal by a legitimate court is to establish a dictatorship.
The potential here ..is what the Obama administration and the Left see as opportunity.
The opportunity is to criminalize political difference of opinion. They spent the Bush 43 years talking about that opportunity. Nobody on the right wants to listen..because they frankly can’t believe it.
This, BTW, is where the UN is trying to go as well.
http://www.slate.com/id/2212662/
We are in mortal danger...and this issue, Criminalization of difference of opinion, is the nexus between the left and Islam.
If so then the ruling is, in effect, stayed for 14 days before the judgement can be executed. At least that's my reading. If this is the case then the Obama Administration can ignore the ruling for two weeks. After that they have to file an appeal and ask the Appeals Court to stay the ruling.
Here is the applicable part of Rule 62:
FRCB Rule 62
Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment
(a) Automatic Stay; Exceptions for Injunctions, Receiverships, and Patent Accountings.
Except as stated in this rule, no execution may issue on a judgment, nor may proceedings be taken to enforce it, until 14 days have passed after its entry.
It looks like Durbin was careful to say what he did in a hallway interview as he left a committee meeting.
Leni
Constitution bump for later.........
“enforce”??? Enforce??
bookmark.