Out of the 18, we'll be lucky to get 2 or 3 conservatives.
1 posted on
02/02/2011 7:21:10 PM PST by
pissant
To: pissant
From what I’ve observed in the state run “media” over the past couple of weeks, it appears that the DemocRATS have already selected Mitt Romney for us.
2 posted on
02/02/2011 7:23:15 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare funds 16,000 new tax collectors but no new doctors. Now that's what I call "green" jobs.)
To: pissant
Yes the size of the field matters. If there are multiple conservatives going into the primaries, we’ll have to choose in November between a socialist and a Marxist.
3 posted on
02/02/2011 7:26:07 PM PST by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: pissant
4 posted on
02/02/2011 7:26:58 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: pissant
5 posted on
02/02/2011 7:27:47 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(The TOTUS-reader is a Judas Goat, leading the American sheeple to the slaugherhouse /Parmy)
To: pissant; onyx; 2ndDivisionVet
How big will the Republican presidential field be?About 5' 4" and turning 47 this month.
6 posted on
02/02/2011 7:28:00 PM PST by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: pissant
Out of the 18, we'll be lucky to get 2 or 3 conservatives. Good. Let the other 15 split the vote.
8 posted on
02/02/2011 7:33:38 PM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: pissant
The more the merrier. While, with a large number, some of the best will be knocked off early, it will generate more interest. DumBO will not have a good target and will spend much at poor prospects.
14 posted on
02/02/2011 7:49:01 PM PST by
depressed in 06
(The only thing the ZerO administration is competent at is bad ideas.)
To: pissant
1972 (Democrats), 1976 (Democrats), 2000 (Republicans) and 2008 (Republicans)Large fields must equal weak nominees. McGovern, Carter, George W. Bush, McCain.
Doesn't bode well for 2012.
15 posted on
02/02/2011 7:50:05 PM PST by
PAR35
To: pissant
I can support Huntsman, as well as Cain. My favorites are in my tagline. I also have a nightmare list on my homepage.
16 posted on
02/02/2011 7:50:26 PM PST by
matthew fuller
(My list: Bachman, Barbour, Bolton, Cain, Liz Cheney, Daniels, DeMint, Inhofe, Palin, and Pawlenty .)
To: pissant
Under no circumstance should the slime stream media be allowed to pick our candidate like last time.
17 posted on
02/02/2011 7:50:52 PM PST by
depressed in 06
(The only thing the ZerO administration is competent at is bad ideas.)
To: pissant
I predict it will be MUCH smaller now that Obama’s numbers have gone back up.
To: pissant
Skip Romney.
Guyis definitely touring everywhere and he is running but I hope he runs out of gas first.
24 posted on
02/02/2011 8:06:22 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: pissant
Both Huntsman and Romneys are RINOs who worked with,
supported, and created things used by, pRes_ _ent Obama.
And THAT is why NEITHER is in the real picture...
except as GOP spoilers for their own buddies, Obama and Reid.
Click here for HARRY info
39 posted on
02/03/2011 2:25:27 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson