Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDA deregulates GE alfalfa; opens door to new era of widespread genetic pollution of crops
NaturalNews.com ^ | January 28, 2011 | Mike Adams

Posted on 02/01/2011 7:11:47 PM PST by Razzz42

Under these programs, the USDA uses chemical poisons to murder literally millions of birds each year, including an occasional endangered species animal by accident. This is all part of the USDA's insane program of death to protect the financial interests of conventional agriculture giants.

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ge; gmo; monsanto; organic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-236 next last
To: Irenic
How do you reconcile this comment with your tag-line?

“5 posted on Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:19:19 PM by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)”

Perhaps you’re saying gov’t needs to get their nose out of farmers butt? I agree, no more subsidies and dictating yields!

You do understand supply/demand, don't you? A 10% oversupply of grains is deadly to prices.

Using corn for example; demand over that past 25 years has nearly doubled, and thanks to GM crops (think Roundup-Ready corn or soybeans) supply has kept pace, but it's an annual tightrope, with weather being a huge, uncontrollable factor. A series of rains can make the difference between profit or loss. The newer GM grains are more drought resistant, and , thanks to companies like Monsanto, even more drought resistant varieties will be in the field this year.

For more than 50 years the Federal Government has had a "Cheap Food for Consumers" agricultural program. It's most commonly just called "The Farm Subsidies Program".

It's been very effective in providing an abundance of cheap food for consumers, usually at the expense of the American Farmer.

The farmer would be better off without that program, but I can assure you that you wouldn't be happy about it.

121 posted on 02/02/2011 7:25:46 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

Good thing they’re not using DDT to save human lives.


122 posted on 02/02/2011 7:27:50 AM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42
Anti-technological mysticism is usually the domain of Gaea worshiping non armpit shaving leftists.

GM foods have been a great boon to the world in general and America in particular, and will continue to be. We can either remain at the forefront of this movement and profit thereby or stand astride the tide and shout “STOP!” and look the fool.

123 posted on 02/02/2011 7:33:06 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Yep, one time use seeds meaning if the farmer cannot purchase seeds the next growing season they are in a bad way as they have no seed in reserve to grow a crop the next season.

Come-on guys, don't be showing your ignorance all over the board. It's embarassing to us readers.

"One time" seed for most crops has been used since at least the 1950's, more than 60 years. No farmer who wanted to farm for more than 2 years ever tried to use the crop production as seed.

Seriously, the only redeeming value of the Leftist tripe you guys are spewing is that it's so easily refuted by common knowledge.

Even a farmers first grade son or daughter knows you're full on beans.

124 posted on 02/02/2011 7:38:33 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom
Look at the real world consequences of banning GMO, to start.

If potatoes are 39 cents a pound or 59 cents a pound, that’s fine.

Are you sure that's what you want? 25 years ago we raised 7 billions bushels of corn annually. That's to changes in practices, and especially to GM corn seed, (think Monsanto) today we raise 14 billion bushels.

What do you think would happen if we eliminated GM seed, and were suddenly short 30% or 40% on some of our main crops?

Instead of 39 cents or 59 cents, think more like $3.90 or $5.90 a pound for those potatoes. Get to the store early, 'cuz they'll all be gone before noon.

Enjoy your 'organic' foods, they are a luxury that America can afford only because most people eat food produced by GM plants.

125 posted on 02/02/2011 7:55:38 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Yes, there is a case ... not the hundreds or thousands that one might think that there is by reading statements on these GMO or farming threads.

As a farmer, we have contact with the local Monsanto rep, and he has never been anything but helpful. That doesn't mean that we look at Monsanto as a big, benevolent entity. They operate in a very competitive market and they are aggressive. But they are not going around trying to sue farmers out of existence. That makes no sense at all.

126 posted on 02/02/2011 7:58:20 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Odd, so now one chimes in whilst ignoring Monsanto using lawsuits to corner the seed market and sue farmers for their own contamination?

As for the Terminator seeds, afaik, they have not been sold as of yet..have they?


127 posted on 02/02/2011 8:50:59 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

>> “that people are living longer and healthier than ever before.” <<

.
Repeating that lie is wearing thin.

People are certainly not healthier in any way.

In the early 1950s the figure for cancer probability was one in five, which became one in four in the early 1960s, and stands now at close to one in two.

In 1950 diabetics were a small unnoticed minority, and type II diabetes was unknown to the average joe on the street. Now close to a third of our adult population show dangerously high blood glucose levels, which is a very likely cause for the alarming cancer probability, since most cancers are glycosylating, and have a voracious appetite for sugar.

The rise in type II diabetes keys in well with the pushing of poly unsaturated vegetable oils, and the even worse manufactured ‘fats’ in the various forms of ‘margerine.’

No, we are not living longer, or healthier, and statistical manipulation has not dented the mortician’s bottom line in any way.
.


128 posted on 02/02/2011 8:52:36 AM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle; padre35

>> “”One time” seed for most crops has been used since at least the 1950’s, more than 60 years.” <<

.
But that is not “Terminator” seed; that’s just ordinary cross polinated seed that reverts back to one of the parent varieties on the regrowth.

There is nothing wrong with natural cross breeding.


129 posted on 02/02/2011 8:59:54 AM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle; Irenic

>> “You do understand supply/demand, don’t you? A 10% oversupply of grains is deadly to prices” <<

.
Now we see who the real Leftist / Statist is. - You’ve accused others here that are advocating the true conservative position of spreading “leftist tripe,” but you have no qualms about advancing the ideas of Lenin and Stalin.


130 posted on 02/02/2011 9:03:32 AM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
We have a problem, Houston... (gist of my gripe)

Agreed. But it's not man infringing on God's realm through technology. Rather it's man's ability to screw up his intellectual property law and his inability to restrain and penalize abuses by alleged holders of said IP. Scientists create; lawyers destroy!

131 posted on 02/02/2011 9:28:54 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

What a joke you are!


132 posted on 02/02/2011 9:31:26 AM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

That malicious propaganda has all been up-ended, and you should be ashamed foe advancing it.

Pay some attention to reality, and stop helping the destroyers and death culture.

I’m 66 years old, never had a vaccine in my life, had all the childhood ‘diseases,’ which left me stronger than those that had vaccines.

I’m the clown that never used any of his sick leave, and resigned the county job at age 35 with 5000 SL hours on the books, and everyone shaking their heads.

Eat real food, stay away from doctors unless you are injured, and you’ll be ok.
.


133 posted on 02/02/2011 9:43:39 AM PST by editor-surveyor (NOBAMA - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
Yeah the government never makes a mistake in judgment as any good mole will have you believe.
134 posted on 02/02/2011 10:02:32 AM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

GMOs are going to feed the world, just as our hybrids have for the past 50 or 100 years.

In an era of solar cooling we are very lucky to have the ability to genetically modify crops. It will keep the price of food down.


135 posted on 02/02/2011 10:07:57 AM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
No, we are not living longer, or healthier, and statistical manipulation has not dented the mortician’s bottom line in any way.

Live expectancey in the 50's was less than 70, today it's nearly 80. Yeah, all those cancer deaths have increaed our life spans.

136 posted on 02/02/2011 10:28:28 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Odd, so now one chimes in whilst ignoring Monsanto using lawsuits to corner the seed market and sue farmers for their own contamination?

What corner on the seed market? Farmers are free to chose whatever seed they want.

The problem for the Leftists is that companies like Monsanto provide such a powerful seed which farmers make more money from than anything else, and they freely chose to do business with them.

Ever heard of Roundup-Ready corn or soybeans? The seed is VERY expensive. Yet, farmers line up to buy it, leaving the other, cheaper seed in the storehouse.. Why do you think that is?

137 posted on 02/02/2011 10:34:07 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Go get your mommy to change your diaper, you uneducated punk.


138 posted on 02/02/2011 10:41:39 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

I do shop around the grocery stores for quality and flavor. I have taken to grinding my own hamburger from higher quality cuts of beef too. It is cheaper and a much better flavor. The corn though has been changed to something I would not recognized. Maybe if I find a seed source from historic types to grow. I absolutely would swear that corn is now grown for higher sugar content so it works better for corn syrup, sweeteners and of course make more ethanol per bushel. Remember the taste of corn on the cob? It tasted like corn, not canned cream corn. It had huge kernels too.


139 posted on 02/02/2011 10:47:18 AM PST by runninglips (government debt = slavery of the masses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Really?

How do you explain this:

On 28 January 2010, a five-member statutory tribunal of the GMC found some three dozen charges proved, including four counts of dishonesty and 12 counts involving the abuse of developmentally challenged children.[7] The panel ruled that Wakefield had “failed in his duties as a responsible consultant”, acted both against the interests of his patients, and “dishonestly and irresponsibly” in his published research.[8][9][10] The Lancet immediately and fully retracted his 1998 publication on the basis of the GMC’s findings, noting that elements of the manuscript had been falsified.[11] Wakefield was struck off the Medical Register in May 2010, and may no longer practise medicine in the UK.[

Link here if you want to get educated as to whereof you speak:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield


140 posted on 02/02/2011 10:52:50 AM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson