Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scrap AWACS, JSTARS; Plough Dough Into F-35, Wynne Says
DoD Buzz ^ | 1/31/2011 | Colin Clark

Posted on 01/31/2011 9:15:23 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: DallasDeb
I have another question. If we give up AWACS, who is going to manage the Link? Kinda hard to conduct "net centric" warfare without a net.
41 posted on 01/31/2011 10:30:24 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Its time for your meds leave me alone you crazy man!


42 posted on 01/31/2011 10:31:31 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RCFlyer

He thrashed my thread. You see some more.


43 posted on 01/31/2011 10:32:38 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Pick one: F-22 or F-35

Can you tell me the difference in the internal air to ground carriage for those two airframes?

44 posted on 01/31/2011 10:57:19 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Can you tell me the cost to buy and maintain both platforms?


45 posted on 01/31/2011 11:01:02 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RCFlyer

“RCFlyer” as in RC-135 crewman?


46 posted on 01/31/2011 11:08:49 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's called the "Statue of Liberty" and not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
"Funny, I’ve never heard about an AWACS being taken down by the enemy. "

Debt of Honor - Tom Clancy

yitbos

47 posted on 01/31/2011 11:13:06 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit; Southack

I’m surprised he didn’t cite P-51s...or maybe the planes I spent most of my career in, F-4s and F-111s. After all, the Boneyard is full of ‘em! That makes the F-35 redundant...


48 posted on 01/31/2011 11:49:23 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Southack

What is the procurement budget of the US military? How does it compare to bogus spending like welfare, medicine for seniors, Dept of Education, etc?


49 posted on 01/31/2011 11:51:44 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Bump


50 posted on 01/31/2011 11:59:20 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I agree, does he think that one or even a few pilots will be able to direct our F-22s and other fighter aircraft to intercept or protect strike aircraft and ground forces into an out of battle.


51 posted on 02/01/2011 12:01:14 AM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

What will the military budget be after the nation is bankrupt?

Once the *interest* on our national debt exceeds annual tax revenues...no more military. So there is a hard limit to how much we can (borrow and) spend.

Plan in advance accordingly.


52 posted on 02/01/2011 12:20:14 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I agree, control the airspace with F22’s and the other plans can do their job. No need for the F35, but we need lots more F22s and the Navy will need an equivalent fighter too.
53 posted on 02/01/2011 12:54:11 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

The Navy has the F18 and UCAVs. The rest can be handled by the F22 and B1s+B2s+A10s.


54 posted on 02/01/2011 12:59:59 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The F-22 was over $200 million a copy. When you develop a brand new fighter and buy less than 200 of them, the proportional cost of R&D is really high.

My guess would be the F-35 is going to be somewhat less than $100 million. Again DOD was shooting for $65 million a copy, but we have cut the buy, so that the R&D costs are spread over fewer aircraft.

It still doesn't change the fact that the two aircraft are not interchangeable. If you came up with some super air to air weapon you might be able to get away with using JSF for the fighter role, but there is no way in all Christendom that you are going to get a useable bomb load on an F-22.

Since you don't know the answer to my question I will answer it for you. F-22 has a small weapons bay, meant to hold air to air weapons, AMRAAM and AIM-9X. A small diameter bomb, only 250 lb. was developed that can fit in that weapons bay. The cool thing is that it has been tested in supersonic deliveries so you can huck that weapon a long way and go so fast it will be almost impossible for a SAM to get you. So what can you do with that 250 lb. bomb? Attack SAM sites.

JSF was built around carrying two 2000 lb. bombs internally. That is a first few nights of the war ability to hit well defended targets with the standard heavy ordnance. After that, you can throw bomb racks on the wings and go from stealth to a low observable bomb truck when air superiority has been established.

Cost to maintain will be cheaper on the JSF for several reasons. Single engine, more airframes which makes spares cheaper, and a diagnostic computer that is supposed to predict failures before they occur.

55 posted on 02/01/2011 1:01:31 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

You’ve missed the point. We can’t afford both platforms. Pick one. F22 or F35.

If you can’t choose between them, then we overspend ourselves into financial oblivion and you’ll wind up with none.


56 posted on 02/01/2011 1:04:37 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EC-121_shootdown_incident
The EC-121 shootdown incident occurred on 15 April 1969 when a United States Navy Lockheed EC-121M Warning Star on a reconnaissance mission was shot down by North Korean MiG-17 aircraft over the Sea of Japan. The plane crashed 90 nautical miles (167 km) off the North Korean coast and all 31 Americans on board were killed.
The Nixon administration chose not to retaliate against North Korea

NEVER FORGET!


57 posted on 02/01/2011 1:05:12 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The point is already decided. The F-22 line was shut down.

Talk about missing the point. You don't seem to understand that with the exception of the B-2 (which there are 20) all the airplanes you intend to use for strike aircraft are 30+ years old and are going to the boneyard soon. You are going to be left with some Super Hornets, some F-22s and some late model F-15E and F-16s. The UCAV is not as far through development as the F-35.

Another thing laymen seem to not understand is that while the A-10 is a great airplane for low threat CAS, you cannot take it where the enemy has SAMs. It is too slow. You can't put it in a strike package with other aircraft. It is too slow. No matter how much you like that airplane, it won't get any faster. It has a wing that is a couple feet thick.

58 posted on 02/01/2011 1:17:23 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Southack
To be competitive in the air wars of today and the near future, winning fighters will all have at least ONE of the following traits: 1. Stealth, 2. Amazing peak speed, 3. Be unmanned, and/or 4. Have an orbital or sub-orbital capability.You want pilots to continue fighting in aircraft like the A-10, the B-1, and the F-18. The B-1 is pretty fast, but besides that none of those aircraft meet these qualities.

These qualities should look familiar, I got them off your profile.

59 posted on 02/01/2011 1:22:26 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Yup. That’s what will win. Of course, you can’t go bankrupt before the battle if you want to win.


60 posted on 02/01/2011 1:24:50 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson