I don't think Jules here knows the meaning of the word "censorship", but if you follow the link, there's pictures that make ME want to "censor" them here.
1 posted on
01/26/2011 10:17:27 AM PST by
Baladas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Baladas
Sex perverts should not be permitted to adopt children.
To: Baladas
Maybe they’re trying to “shield” them from the picture of Sir Elton himself. He looks creepy as hell in that shot!
3 posted on
01/26/2011 10:21:31 AM PST by
jtal
To: Baladas
This shield comes from a place of ignorance, intolerance and hate. Naw, it comes from a box of shields in the stockroom.
They are used to keep folks from having to see pictures
of sick fags being allowed to mess up an innocent kid.
4 posted on
01/26/2011 10:22:41 AM PST by
humblegunner
(Blogger Overlord)
To: Baladas
This makes us angry. Really, really angry. This shield comes from a place of ignorance, intolerance and hate. An image of two loving parents thrilled to finally have a child of their own? This is clearly not something that should be censored. Ever.
Fine, let's do away with ignorance and educate people. Homosexual men have anal sex. One man puts his penis in another man's anus. Babies can't be made that way because the anus was not designed for procreation. It's biological function is to ride the body of waste.
PRINT THAT!
5 posted on
01/26/2011 10:22:45 AM PST by
TSgt
(Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
To: Baladas
Hey Julia - want to see what real ignorance, intolerance and hate is? Try talking about Conservatism to a liberal or professing your Christian faith in front of them. Better yet, go on a 'tolerant' program like The View and try that.
You'll get to see what REAL intolerance and hatred is all about, real fast.
6 posted on
01/26/2011 10:23:07 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(ohhh, right there, that's it. Yeaaa!!)
To: Baladas
Elton John and his sex pervert didn't have a child. That child does not have the genetic makeup of both parents. Herein lies the fallacy of the claim that homosexuals can be parents just like heterosexuals.
7 posted on
01/26/2011 10:23:15 AM PST by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier preparing to deploy to Afghanistan)
To: Baladas
Okay, his sexual thing aside, who wants to see that ugly old head anyway?
8 posted on
01/26/2011 10:23:49 AM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Baladas
Shame on the people at Harps Supermarket.
They shoud not even be selling this trash in the first place.
But if they must, then at least they have the decency to filter out the faggotry.
9 posted on
01/26/2011 10:24:12 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: Baladas
Sorry, but a private business has the right to determine what will and won’t be displayed in their establishments. If this store doesn’t want to display perversion, that’s their call.
10 posted on
01/26/2011 10:24:30 AM PST by
Sister_T
("Calling ILLEGAL aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters 'customers'!"-UCFRoadWarrior ><>)
To: Baladas
Julia’s not too bright if she thinks these two perverts are “loving parents”.
Just my opinion of course.
11 posted on
01/26/2011 10:25:11 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: Baladas
Rubin tells you he/she/it is mad.
To: Baladas
Two things occur to me here:
1. The store — being a private business — has a right to “censor” anything it displays on its shelves. Just as customers offended by such censorship have a right to shop elsewhere.
2. To circumvent any such issues, the store might be well advised to simply stop carrying Us magazine entirely. Because I would imagine that for every fruitbat edified at the sight of two wrinkled poofters cooing over a helpless baby there will be a hundred offended at that sight.
14 posted on
01/26/2011 10:27:11 AM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: Baladas
Correct. Not any different than the parential advisory sticker on CDs (thank you Tipped Gore) or Walmart refusing to sell certain music.
If this were true censorship, the gov’t would have given he orders to hide the cover. They did not.
15 posted on
01/26/2011 10:28:50 AM PST by
rintense
(The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
To: Baladas
Zachary?
That reminds me of the joke where the punchline is “zachary rike assho.” I hope he never hears that joke, but I bet he will.
17 posted on
01/26/2011 10:34:39 AM PST by
OrangeHoof
(Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
To: Baladas
I am glad to hear that. I saw those at my supermarket and was so sorry for that poor baby.
18 posted on
01/26/2011 10:41:12 AM PST by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: Baladas
I saw the mag cover yesterday during checkout at Walmart and wondered to myself which of these two perverts takes care of the breastfeeding duties.
20 posted on
01/26/2011 10:48:58 AM PST by
dainbramaged
(If you want a friend, get a pit bull.)
To: Baladas
I always did like Mountain Home.
23 posted on
01/26/2011 10:58:40 AM PST by
Rastus
To: Baladas
Let’s make a deal!
We’ll leave this pic out for everyone to see if all the baby killing women have to look at a sonogram of their “blob of tissue” before ripping it out!
24 posted on
01/26/2011 11:11:48 AM PST by
FrogMom
(No such thing as an honest democrat!)
To: Baladas
You can go into stores all the time and find books by conservative authors turned around on the shelf. LOL
26 posted on
01/26/2011 11:25:08 AM PST by
dforest
To: Baladas
Why does it upset them? They arenot and will nevr be a “normal” family no matter how much the left wants to make that so. There will never be a way to control thought and the site of that makes many of us very angry for the baby who is being used to make two older gay men feel good.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson