Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
WND ^ | 1/24/2011 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 01/25/2011 3:33:13 AM PST by soakncider

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: soakncider
So now we can hold the criminal trials for the 111 congress charge being treason?

Not to mention Dick Chenny for certifying the election results.

Holding my breath here!

41 posted on 01/25/2011 5:35:04 AM PST by SERE_DOC (My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
Right now the public cares more about the economy and spending/debt than it cares about a technicality in the Constitution.

America is a nation of laws. This so called "technicality" in the Constitution as you call it, is the difference between Obama legally being in the Whitehouse and every Bill that Obama has signed while occupying that seat, being null and void.

In other words, if Obama is NOT legally eligible to be POTUS, any passed Bill or executive order Obama signed into law or regulation, also becomes illegal.


42 posted on 01/25/2011 5:36:18 AM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: soakncider

The Republican governor said he had one, the Democrat governor says he doesn’t.

Can it get any more weird?


43 posted on 01/25/2011 5:36:27 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRG1973
a technicality in the Constitution.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gee! When did Article 2, section 1, become a “technicality”?

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

44 posted on 01/25/2011 5:37:23 AM PST by wintertime (Re: Obama, Rush Limbaugh said, "He was born here." ( So? Where's the proof?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: soakncider
The chorus of investigative noise from the MSM is deafening...


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

45 posted on 01/25/2011 5:37:44 AM PST by The Comedian (Obama is just the cherry on top of the $hit sundae of fraud the democrats have become.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lessthantolerant
"Why does the story not get full investigation by the
opposition to see just how this could have happened?"


46 posted on 01/25/2011 5:40:49 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: soakncider

Hawaii’s governor looking more and more like a lying idiot each and every passing day....I know the majority of Hawaiians are absolutely proud. =.=


48 posted on 01/25/2011 5:49:38 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lessthantolerant
Is our country so corrupt and controlled by socialists that our traditions and rules mean nothing?

Those in power on both sides have nothing but contempt for the Constitution. How dare anyone try to limit their power?

They will never consider the issue because they consider it moot, if for no other reason than the fact that it is in the constitution.

They hate Sarah Palin and the Tea Party because we stand for the rule of law rather than their power.

49 posted on 01/25/2011 5:55:04 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: soakncider
I would like to see the whole affidavit, not just the notarized parts.
50 posted on 01/25/2011 5:55:21 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Nothing in politics is accidental.


51 posted on 01/25/2011 6:01:51 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
I would like to see the whole affidavit, not just the notarized parts.

http://www.wnd.com/files/110123adams1.pdf
http://www.wnd.com/files/110123adams2.pdf

52 posted on 01/25/2011 6:07:29 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: soakncider

Sounds like BOzo and some majory Dems should be behind bars.


53 posted on 01/25/2011 6:13:13 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soakncider

Things are geting curiouser and curiouser!


54 posted on 01/25/2011 6:13:27 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soakncider
There's one big problem with this affidavit:

It refers to "senior officers" repeatedly, without naming names. Those people will have to be named, or this will go nowhere.

He also refers to "various officials", but only names officials that have been publicly quoted in the media. Anyone could get those names from the newspaper.

Unless individual people are identified, there's no way to put them on the witness stand and compel them to tell the truth under penalty of perjury.

Without those names, this is just hearsay -- and can be dismissed as someone looking for 15 minutes of fame.

55 posted on 01/25/2011 6:14:38 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

56 posted on 01/25/2011 6:17:12 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: soakncider

Hasn’t he been swearing that for some time now?


58 posted on 01/25/2011 6:28:28 AM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
we’re talking about DEMOCRATS after all.

So what! Why so free to give them a pass just because..?
59 posted on 01/25/2011 6:47:42 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sanjoaquinvalley
when all this comes out

It already did. Nobody's going to do anything about it because those in a position to do something must think that more harm than good would come from removing him; and then necessarily throwing him in the slammer. (I suppose Biden could do a Ford, but that might do more harm than good too.)

ML/NJ

60 posted on 01/25/2011 6:48:21 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson